Articles by Date

Since when is an act of speech a "Conspiracy to Violate Civil Rights"?

Man Charged in Noose Left on Integration Statue at Ole Miss

Graeme Phillip Harris has been indicted on a trumped-up civil rights charge for tying a noose onto a statue of a negro at a Mississippi campus. No matter how distasteful some may find the act, it has long been argued that such acts fall into the category of "freedom of expression". This evokes memories of flag burning, or a crucifix floating in urine in a certain NYC museum. So black rappers can sell millions of copies of record albums which scream "kill Whitey", and those albums get airplay over and over on the FCC-regulated airwaves. Or black movie stars like Jamie Foxx can gloat about killing White people on national television, and all of that is okay. Or black academics such as Kamau Kambon can stand televised on C-Span and assert that all White people should be exterminated, and that is okay. It is all "free speech". According to this latest government ploy, we can cite case after case of overt conspiracies to violate the "Civil Rights" of Whites by professing open desires to kill them. Yet they are all "free speech", and the noose-tying incident is not? It is clear that the Obama government has found a back door to prosecuting "thought crimes" by abusing current Civil Rights laws.

We hope to offer an expanded commentary on this incident in the very near future.

UPDATES:

In September of 2015 Graeme Phillip Harris was sentenced to 6 months in prison and 12 months probabtion.

In March of 2016 Austin Reed Edenfield was sentenced to 12 months probation for assisting Harris.

This is an astounding transgression against the right to free expression, which evidently is only a right reserved for Leftists.

Bible? Or Bureaucracy?

 





00:00









_Parable-of-the-Trees_2012_02_16.mp3 — Downloaded 8970 times
 





00:00









ChrSat20150124-Walking_the_Walk_4.mp3 — Downloaded 10156 times

 

While it is barely evident in Scripture, once upon a time the White Adamic race lived under the rule of something which the Bible later calls the Melchisedek priesthood. The word Melchisedek basically means Righteousness is my King. That this priesthood was represented in the natural patriarchy of man is evident in places such as 2 Peter chapter 2 where the apostle refers to Noah as “the eighth proclaimer of righteousness”, as well as in the contextual progression of the Biblical accounts in which a patriarchal society is clearly portrayed. This Melchisedek priesthood is mentioned in Psalms and in Paul's epistle to the Hebrews, and we are informed in both the prophecy and the epistle that Jesus Christ Himself is the new Melchisedek priest. Of course, Jesus Christ being the first-born among many brethren and being Yahweh God incarnate, He alone is the ultimate patriarch of our White Adamic race.

In Genesis chapter 10, some time between the reestablishment of the Adamic oikoumenê after the flood of Noah and the call of Abraham which came over 1,200 years later, a descendant of Ham named Nimrod merited special mention among the families of Genesis 10 because he had asserted rule over the others of his kindred. There we read: “8 And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth. 9 He was a mighty hunter before the LORD: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD. 10 And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. 11 Out of that land went forth Asshur, and builded Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth, and Calah, 12 And Resen between Nineveh and Calah: the same is a great city.” The land of Nimrod's empire was later called the land of Cush in Scripture, after Nimrod's father. Ostensibly, at its height it encompassed Mesopotamia and extended to the border of Egypt. During this time, the serpent had become a symbol of kingship not only in Egypt, but also in Sumer, Akkad and among the Hittites.

Martin Luther: A Lightning Bolt May Have Changed the World—or Not

This article originally appeared in the July-August, 2008 issue of The Barnes Review

Martin Luther: A Lightning Bolt May Have Changed the World—or Not

By JOHN TIFFANY

THE PROTESTANT REFORMATION got rolling during the first half of the 16th century when Martin Luther (1483-1546), a German Catholic priest, attempted to reform the Roman Church most notably by declaring that Christians should focus upon faith as a means to salvation. He feared that through selling “indulgences,” the church came perilously close to selling salvation to the rich. Luther believed that the ultimate power of decision as to who would be saved was vested in God, not the church....

The church responded by excommunicating Luther, which only caused him to start up a new church, the Lutheran denomination, and to translate the Bible into the common speech of the German people so they could read it directly. The success of the Lutheran revolution led the Roman church to launch its own “Counterreformation,” much to the relief of those who remained Catholic. With the Council of Trent, the church doctrine was modified and unified, many of the questionable practices of the church, such as the selling of indulgences, were abolished. The Council of Trent also demanded that all Bible texts be taken literally insofar as possible. The intention was to make things as clear as possible to Catholics at a time when the Protestants were already separating into different branches amid much confusion.

Without Luther the genius of Goethe, Schiller, Bach, Kant and Hegel could not have found expression. Without Luther’s spirit, there would have been no Bismarck, and the growth of science would have been stunted. Freedom of speech would be almost nonexistent. Thus Luther is a hero today to Protestants, Catholics and secularists alike.

And we owe it all, seemingly, to a lightning bolt. But how much of what we think we know about Luther is actually a myth?

The Effrontery of Judaism, Part 3: After Sweden, Jews Now Openly Seek to Destroy Norway

The "Norwegian Center against Racism" is just another front for Jewish treachery against White Europe. They set up these "non-governmental" agencies and then their Jewish cronies in the media give them respectability which they do not deserve, which in turn enables them to pilfer government funding.

Like the demon who calls herself Barbra Lerner Spectre, and her demonic sister Anetta Kahane, Ervin Kohn is just one more Jew who has set himself up as an authority on race, insisting that Whites are evil and need to be overrun with non-Whites in order to atone for that evil.

When will Whites learn once and for all that these Jews are nothing but satanic devils seeking to destroy every last vestige of White and Christian society?

Video below: Ervin Kohn and some brain-dead apparently white shiksa

 
00:00

The Rabbit Hole

They peddle science fiction fantasy as news, build a worldview around their own lies, and then they have the gall to mock Christians!

Rabbit holes are man-made constructs which have an alluring power. They are typically built around some religious belief, pseudo-science, event, or even some combination of these, and they have ability to propel truth-seekers down paths of inquiry where nothing of substance is ever accomplished, acquired or learned even though something is always just out of reach.

For example, there certainly is truth in many so-called conspiracy theories, such as the fact that Oswald alone did not kill Kennedy or the fact that Israelis and certain government insiders were responsible for the events of a particular September 11th morning. However these things are readily observable from both the circumstances and the behavior of the parties involved and those who were within the periphery of the events themselves, if one can gain access to the hard data required to make such an observation.

But in order to distract people from finding the important rudimentary truths behind the causes of such events, a thousand books, articles or items in the electronic media quickly appear trumpeting a thousand different theories. In that manner, if anyone does navigate the labyrinth successfully, the one account which may reflect the truth of the matter is drowned out by a thousand lies.

Vladimir Putin Supports Israel. Are White Nationalists Still in Denial?

Vladimir Putin Supports Israel, and even the recent invasion of Gaza. Are White Nationalists Still in Denial?

[Updated for the Saxon Messenger July 21st, 2014]

How many times must Vladimir Putin embrace world Jewry before western White Nationalists realize that he is just another politician in the pocket of the beast? How many laws banning "holocaust" revisionism? How many laws banning real Russian nationalism? Now there are reports that Putin is even supporting the rogue Israeli state's recent terror in Gaza (as has been reported by Colive.com and by Arutz Sheva, an Israeli news outlet, as well as other organizations).

Among the Gaza conflict and other things discussed at a recent meeting (the pictures above and at right are from Colive.com) with a group of rabbis, Arutz Sheva reported that “Rabbi Lau, former Ashkenazic Chief Rabbi and current Chief Rabbi of Tel Aviv, spoke in the meeting about his remarkable personal story as a survivor of the Holocaust who later became the chief rabbi of Israel. In this context, Putin consulted with the rabbis on means of dealing with anti-Semitism, Holocaust deniers and preventing historical revisionism.”

So much for truth in Russia. And so much for anything in Russia which is actually in the interests of White Christians anywhere. Whatever is good for the Jews, Putin will support. It is time that White Nationalists, and especially Christian Identity adherents, took an honest look at Vladimir Putin.

Just this May, Vladimir Putin made it illegal to question any aspect of the Holocaust in Russia, with a penalty of 5 years imprisonment for those who do so. Under this new law, not only is it illegal to question any official report concerning Soviet history during the Second World War. It is also illegal to question the official reports concerning the verdicts of the Nuremberg trials. Therefore the innumerable Jewish lies concerning the so-called Holocaust are now upheld by law in Putin's Russia.

Prothink.org on Relativism and White Nationalism

 
00:00

 

Sven Longshanks joins Mike Delaney in a 1-hour discussion on the poison of Jewish Relativism among secular White Nationalists. See Prothink.org for the original post. Sven is the author of the websites Fascovereign Weltanschauung and Aryan Israel, and he also writes for the Daily Stormer.

Swedish Media Offers Expose, But Still Apologetically Supports Left-Wing Violence

We have long known that groups such as the "Antifa" and ARA (and AFA) are tools for the support of Marxism and Jewish Supremacism. They are organized and dominated by Jews, and they radicalize naive White youth against the interests of their own race. These groups are funded and supported by Jewish organizations such as the ADL and the SPLC, in spite of the fact that the groups openly espouse violence and suppress the Constitutional rights (in the U.S.A.) or basic human rights of others who are not necessarily violent. But the problem with these groups in Europe is even more open than it is in America.

 

Ukraine, or Jewkraine?

 





00:00









ChrSat20140228-UkraineSituation.mp3 — Downloaded 5432 times

Orthodox Ukrainian Pilgrim
Orthodox pilgrim in Kiev Pechersk Lavra, Ukraine. Photo by Petar Milošević. Wikimedia Commons.

Only a few White Christian nations have suffered as much under the heel of satanic treachery as has Ukraine. In the 20th century Ukraine was trampled under foot by Russian and German armies in two major wars. In between the two wars, it was ravaged in the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution, its population decimated by both the results of the victory of Jewish Communism and then by the famines of the Holodomor during the forced Soviet collectivization in the 1930's. The second German occupation was seen by many native Ukrainians as a liberation from their Soviet Jewish oppressors, although it was sadly short-lived. Today, many Ukrainians still hope for that same liberation.

Ukraine is about 78% Ukrainian, 17% Russian and the balance is made up mostly of Tatars, while there are some Poles, Romanians and others in the various border areas. But those general numbers are deceiving. The Russians and Tatars are concentrated along the eastern border, and mostly in the Crimea, which is perhaps 65% Russian and practically 100% Russophone. Russians in the Crimea may consider themselves as natives now, however most of them settled there during the Soviet era when the region was an important asset to Soviet military interests. Basically, the Russians gained the Crimea through Tsarist and then Soviet imperialism, and the land is not even contiguous to Russia – at least presently. Therefore, since a Russian government gave Crimea over to Ukraine over 60 years ago, and it is contiguous to Ukraine, present Russian claims to the Crimea are of less substance than Mexican claims to southern California, although the results of a referendum in either place are inevitable. The pre-Soviet inhabitants of Crimea, who are ethnic Tatars, oppose pro-Russian political parties and have supported Ukrainian nationalists, although Tatars are certainly not Ukrainian.

Slavery for a Hundred Years - and Longer

 





00:00









CHR20140207-Slavery-for-100-Years.mp3 — Downloaded 20713 times
Resources:
Slavery for a Hundred Years.odt — Downloaded 2657 times, CATO-FederalReserve-WorkingPaper-2.pdf — Downloaded 3410 times


Slavery for a Hundred Years .. and Longer

In the United States the Federal Reserve turned 100 years old this December, an event which the institution itself commemorated, and which is mentioned in several articles on its own websites. While it was also celebrated to some degree in the mass media, there was little mass media criticism of the Fed's one-hundred-year history. In fact, outlets such as USA Today actually celebrated the outgoing Fed chairman, and in an article entitled “5 things you didn't know about 100-year-old Fed”, while it justly blames the institution for such events as the Great Depression, it portrays even that in the best possible light. However this USA Today article, in its last item in the list and the only one of the five which is relevant to current events, only celebrates the Fed's recent introduction of digital check clearing technology. Conservative estimates of the potential cost to taxpayers of recent bank bailouts orchestrated by the Federal Reserve run from 9 trillion (The New York Times) to over 12 trillion (PBS.org) to 14 trillion (CNN.com) to as much as 29 trillion dollars (CNBC.com). But all that USA Today has to discuss concerning the Fed in this era is the inevitable adoption of digital check clearing! If most Americans are ignorant – and it can be demonstrated that they certainly are – it is because they are too trusting of the media by which they expect to be informed. Reporting on the Fed's anniversary by most of the other major media outlets seemed sterile, to say the least, and with a few exceptions, apparently none of them ever challenge the nonsensical idea that the Federal Reserve is a legitimate institution concerned with the national interest.

Pages