Christogenea Saturdays

Christogenea is reader supported. If you find value in our work, please help to keep it going! See our Contact Page for more information.

Every Saturday night at 8:PM Eastern.

CHRISTOGENEA Saturdays on Talkshoe at 8:00 PM Eastern

 

TalkShoe

TruthVid's 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White, Part 7

Submitted by William Finck on

ChrSat20200912-100Proofs-07.mp3 — Downloaded 2120 times

 

TruthVid's 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White, Part 7

Over the first six presentations in this series we covered only 20 of TruthVid’s 100 Proofs, and now that we are past all of the most important of the points he hopes to make, we imagine we may progress a little faster through the next 80. But maybe not. In any case, out of necessity, we may still have to repeat ourselves, finding it necessary to explain things which we have already covered in detail. Our first item this evening is one of those things, so I will do my best to present it from a different perspective.

First, we shall discuss a few important points that may have been missed in our last presentation:

Agriculture – Did we neglect to make mention of the fact that the calendar and feast days were all related to agriculture and the planting and harvest seasons? Only recently, since the dawn of the industrial age, has our own view of a calendar moved away from its dependence upon agriculture, however many of our modern holidays began in celebration of agricultural events such as planting and harvest and first fruits.

White Israelites in archaeology – [in Part 5,] I neglected to mention the 3rd century AD frescos discovered in the synagogue at Dura-Europos in eastern Syria, 275 miles east of the Mediterranean Sea and 325 miles north-northeast of ancient Tyre. These are at least as important as discoveries in Galilee, such as the mosaics at Hukkok, because they are apparently older and much further east that Galilee, in lands that were not controlled by Rome. If these Judaeans in diverse places were White, then the ancient Israelites must also have been White.

TruthVid's 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White, Part 6

Submitted by William Finck on

ChrSat20200905-100Proofs-06.mp3 — Downloaded 2150 times

 

TruthVid's 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White, Part 6

Here we covered points 16 through 20 of his 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White. While there is a lot of extemporaneous commentary in the discussion, William Finck’s prepared notes are found below:

While by necessity we have had to repeat ourselves at times, in an endeavor to provide the full evidence for each individual point, or proof, we hope to round out the top 20 on the list this evening, with proofs 16 through 20. Doing this, we are going to also focus on many of the blessings of Jacob and Moses which they had made to the twelve tribes before their deaths. While we will not recount them all in detail, a few significant promises must be presented.

We have already discussed the initial promises to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, that their seed would be multitudinous, that nations and kings would come out of their loins, and that in that manner they would inherit the Adamic world, all of which was fulfilled by the time of Christ. But that was an ongoing process which took many centuries to fulfill, and it was still developing in the time of Christ. In Genesis chapters 48 and 49, Jacob begins to reiterate those promises, and gives additional blessings, as he passes the promises onto his twelve sons. Later, Moses blesses the tribes in his own words, as we read in Deuteronomy chapter 33.

TruthVid's 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White, Part 5

Submitted by William Finck on

ChrSat20200829-100Proofs-05.mp3 — Downloaded 1836 times

 

 

TruthVid's 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White, Part 5

Here we discuss the next two points in TruthVids’ 100 Proofs that the ancient Israelites were White, which concern descriptions of Christ and His apostles in Scripture, ancient history, art and archaeology, and recent genetic studies which prove the same was true of the general population of the Levant in ancient times. Notes prepared by William Finck are found below, but once again, there are many extemporaneous digressions in the podcast which are not found in the notes.

14) Jesus was White

  • Descriptions of Christ in Revelation

In Revelation chapter 1 there is a two-verse description of Christ, which in the King James Version reads: “14 His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; 15 And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.”

There is a common feature of Hebrew language, employed throughout the Bible, called parallelism. This describes a repetitive reference to or description of the same phenomenon in different ways. So where we read that “His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow”, “white like wool” and “white as snow” are such a parallelism, by which we have a greater understanding of what is being described. So it cannot be taken to mean that His hair had the texture of wool, or otherwise it would also have to had the texture of snow, and in the sun He would have had no hair at all. Rather, it only means to describe the whiteness of His hair in different ways, and makes no comment on the texture.

TruthVid's 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White, Part 4

Submitted by William Finck on

ChrSat20200822-100Proofs-04.mp3 — Downloaded 2685 times

 

TruthVid's 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White, Part 4

Here we discuss the next few points of TruthVid’s 100 proofs, which we shall summarize as follows: The Epistles of Paul were written only to White Europeans. The Seven Churches of the Revelation were all in cities of White Europeans. The testimony in the New Testament of the fulfillment of the promises to Abraham that many nations would come of him, that nations and kings would come out of his seed, or his loins, where the apostles inform us that those were nations of White Europeans. Some notes prepared for this presentation by William Finck are found below, although there was much extemporaneous discussion.

The Recipients of Paul’s Epistles

Discounting the four epistles which Paul of Tarsus had written to individuals, there were eight audiences for Paul’s epistles. These were as follows:

Europe: Rome (Italy), Corinth (Greece, northern part of Peloponnese near the isthmus), Philippi (northern Greece, off north coast of Aegean Sea east of Thessalonica), Thessalonica (northern Greece, northwest shore of Aegean Sea).

Asia Minor (Anatolia): Galatia (north central Anatolia), Ephesus (southwest Anatolia, capital of Roman Asia), Colossae (southwest Anatolia interior near Galatia).

These are seven, and the eighth audience were the Hebrews, which we shall discuss further on. In his travels, Paul had also addressed Lycaonians in Acts chapter 14, and Athenians in Acts chapter 17, but said nothing to them of sin, redemption, covenants, adoption, or Christ, because they were not descended from the Israelites, and Christ did not come for them, in spite of the fact that they descended from other sons of Noah. So when Paul addressed them, instead he spoke of the one true God and of resurrection from the dead, because they are included in the promises made to the entire race of Adam, first found in Genesis chapter 3.

TruthVid's 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White, Part 3

Submitted by William Finck on

ChrSat20200815-100Proofs-03.mp3 — Downloaded 2617 times

 

TruthVid's 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White, Part 3

This evening William Finck and TruthVids discuss points 7 through 10 of his 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White:

7) The Hebrew word ADAM means ruddy, rosy, to show blood or blush in the face.

8 ) Christ sent the Apostles to the lost Sheep of Israel and nobody else.

9) Which race of people has spread the Gospel?

10) The Bible prophesied Israel would have a new language.

Below are some of William Finck's notes, written specifically for this program:

Something which often causes confusion is that many people do not take the time to understand how James Strong had constructed his Concordance, including his Greek and Hebrew Lexicons. In Strong’s #’s 119 through 122, or actually, through # 124, there is a list of words all spelled exactly the same in ancient Hebrew, Aleph-Dalet-Mem, but which are distinguished from one another by the Masoretic vowel points, which did not exist when the Bible was originally written. The vowel points are an attempt by the rabbis to distinguish the different uses of a word or its parts of speech, and Strong followed that system in his Concordance. So adam # 119 is the verb, to show blood in the face, adam # 120 is the noun referring to members of the race or the race as a whole, adam # 121 is Adam as a proper name, referring to the patriarch, adam # 122 is the adjective, meaning red, rosy or ruddy, adam # 123 is Edom, the designation given to Esau, which is the same word, and adam # 124 is a ruby, garnet or sardius, or some other red gemstone so named for its redness....

TruthVid's 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White, Part 2

Submitted by William Finck on

ChrSat20200808-100Proofs-02.mp3 — Downloaded 2803 times

 

This evening William Finck and TruthVids discuss points 4 through 6 of his 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White:

4) Jacob' seed to spread across the whole world
5) Israelites to be known as Sons of God and called by a new name, Christians
6) Israel was to have a new home to be found primarily to the north and west of Palestine

TruthVid's 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White, Part 1

Submitted by William Finck on

ChrSat20200801-100Proofs-01.mp3 — Downloaded 3680 times

 

This evening William Finck and TruthVids discuss the first 3 of his 100 Proofs that the Israelites were White:

1) The origin and migrations of the European people of today
2) The laws of God are everywhere in White European civilizations
3) All European countries and nations were Christian



Addressing Charles Weisman’s What About the Seedline Doctrine? Part 24: Nailing the Coffin

Submitted by William Finck on

ChrSat20200725Weisman24.mp3 — Downloaded 1406 times

 

Addressing Charles Weisman’s What About the Seedline Doctrine? Part 24: Nailing the Coffin

This final portion of our address of Charles Weisman’s book, What About the Seedline Doctrine? may be anticlimactic. We have already witnessed and explained why Charles Weisman is truly not a Christian. We have already elucidated his many contradictions, and we hope to have fully exposed his many outright lies and misrepresentations of Scripture, and now that we near the conclusion of his book, we hope that he is already buried. But if not, then perhaps here we can drive the final nail in the coffin.

Up to this point in Chapter 6 of Weisman’s book, we have seen his attempt to explain psychological reasons for the existence of our Two-Seedline doctrine, and he ascribed a lot of reasons to its existence which all boil down to our needing excuses for blaming Jews for our woes, rather than blaming ourselves. But that too is a straw man argument, because we do not blame Jews for our woes. Rather, we blame sinful Whites who are caught up in all of the idolatry offered to them by Jews, and who have also accepted the antichrist teachings packaged under the umbrella of Liberalism. This is what has led us to accept not only Jews, but all of the other biological infestations of Yahweh’s Creation. So Jewish Supremacy and the imposition of Negros and all of the other races upon Christendom are a result of our problems, and not the actual cause of our problems.

But here Weisman also betrayed himself once again, where he spoke of Jews as a race and admitted that “Throughout all of history we have examples of Jewish hostility towards white Christians, and the harmful effects Jews have had on the European nations. They have clearly been as aliens in our midst destroying our way of life.”

Addressing Charles Weisman’s What About the Seedline Doctrine? Part 23: Trees Good and Evil

Submitted by William Finck on

ChrSat20200718Weisman23.mp3 — Downloaded 1348 times

 

Addressing Charles Weisman’s What About the Seedline Doctrine? Part 23: Trees Good and Evil

We had started to address the portion of this final chapter of Weisman’s book under the subtitle “Elements of the Seedline Doctrine”, where we had left off with a discussion of the explanation of the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares provided by Christ Himself in Matthew chapter 23, as Weisman had mentioned the tares without elaboration. Evidently, Weisman took for granted the acceptance of his notion that tares were only tares because they were followers of the devil – as he had argued in another context on page 30 of his book – rather than being tares because they actually had been planted by the devil. Yet it must be the case, that the actual origin of the tares is with the devil, because as the apostle explained, Christ had come to reveal things kept secret from the foundation of the world. So if these things were kept secret for that long, since that very time which the Genesis account describes, then that is when the events must have actually occurred. The planting of tares among the wheat must be speaking in reference to the events described in a parable in Genesis chapter 3, and the subsequent scattering throughout the Adamic world of the children of Cain, the Rephaim – who are Nephilim – and other groups which may be associated with the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.

Actually, it is a wonder to us that Weisman did not even mention the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares until this very point in his book, where he only made a passing reference to tares and said “The tares are apparently a satanic group of people.” But notice that he said group, and not race, however in that same paragraph Weisman had already spoken of “God’s people” and said that “Jesus spoke of ‘the tares’ or ‘children of the wicked,’ who were contrasted with the ‘good seed.’” So in that case Christ is telling us that their parents were wicked, and we see that He is speaking of a race of wicked people, not merely wicked individuals. In both cases in Matthew 13:38 the word for children is υἱός, which is a son, and the word for seed is σπέρμα, which is offspring. If the people of God are physical offspring of a particular individual, then the seed of the devil also must be physical offspring of a particular individual. Weisman could not offer an exegesis of the parable because doing so he would not have been able to conceal his blatant dishonesty.

Addressing Charles Weisman’s What About the Seedline Doctrine? Part 22: The Devil as a Psychobabbler

Submitted by William Finck on

ChrSat20200711Weisman22.mp3 — Downloaded 1529 times

 

Addressing Charles Weisman’s What About the Seedline Doctrine? Part 22: The Devil as a Psychobabbler

In Chapter 5 of his book, Weisman had attempted to smear our Christian Identity profession with claims that it came from Witchcraft, Gnosticism, Freemasonry, the Talmud, and the Kabbalah. But of course, all of these were actually Jewish, or heavily influenced by Jews, so he could have simply claimed that we got it from Jews. However we have proven throughout this series that our profession does indeed come from Scripture, and we have cited many Christian and non-Jewish sources to support it which are far older than the sources cited in Weisman’s allegations. Therefore all of these Jewish or Jewish-influenced philosophies actually began with basic truths and perverted them into lies, and as we also saw, their resulting lies are not at all similar to what we believe and demonstrate that the Bible teaches.

Now Weisman attempts to discredit us with another plainly Jewish tactic, which is a so-called “psychological study”. Since he denies the truth of Scripture, and even goes so far as to state that Christ was merely following along with Persian and Babylonian dualism, as well as reducing God Incarnate to the level of a common slanderer, he must imagine other and wicked reasons for the existence of our doctrine just like he claimed that there were other and wicked sources from which it originated. Here, Charles Weisman certainly is playing the role of a devil, which is a false accuser.

Pages