Christogenea Internet Radio Podcast Archives

Click here for a simplified listing of titles and links.

Click here for our podcast RSS feed. Christogenea cannot meet Apple's iTunes "politically correct" content standards, and will not list our feed at the iTunes store.

Paul’s Epistle to the Hebrews, Part 9: Departure from Earthly Trappings

Chr20161117-Hebrews09.mp3 — Downloaded 2561 times
 
00:00

 

The comments in the beginning of the program are found in a post at the Christogenea Forum titled Geography Trannies.

Paul’s Epistle to the Hebrews, Part 9: Departure from Earthly Trappings (and: Greek Cherubs, Hebrew Sphinxes)

In the earlier chapters of this epistle to the Hebrews, Paul of Tarsus had spent considerable time proving to his readers from Scripture that there is an eternal priesthood which both precedes and transcends the Levitical priesthood, and that the beloved king David in the Psalms had prophesied of such a coming priest, which is after the “order of Melchizedek”, and that this prophecy was fulfilled in the person of Yahshua Christ. Then in Hebrews chapter 8 Paul connected this prophesied priest to the promise of a new covenant which is found in Jeremiah chapter 31, which Paul had cited at length.

Presenting that last chapter of Hebrews, among the subjects which we had discussed we hope to have substantiated three things, and, in a digression, a fourth. Firstly, that the writings of the Old Testament announce a new covenant in prophecies other than the one in Jeremiah chapter 31 which Paul had quoted. So in that regard we cited Hosea and Ezekiel as second and third witnesses to Jeremiah’s prophecy. Secondly, that the old covenant was broken, first by the people and then by Yahweh God Himself, and therefore nobody can claim to still be under that covenant. In that regard we cited Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel and Zechariah. There is another witnesses in Scripture to the breaking of the old covenant, and the promise of a new, and that is Isaiah, whom we did not cite last week.

The Protocols of Satan, Part 16

ChrSat20161117-Protocols_of_Satan_16.mp3 — Downloaded 3427 times
 
00:00

 

The Protocols of Satan, Part 16

Here on the heels of the latest United States Presidential election we return to our presentation of the Protocols of Satan. Perhaps we may soon know whether this latest election result was granted to provide the world with some temporary relief from the wiles of the devil, or if it is indeed another chapter in the ultimate fulfillment of the Protocols. We should seriously doubt that Satan has ceded any control over American politics, and believe instead that the devils are indeed satisfied with the outcome. George Soros had boasted on network television that Hillary Clinton would lose the popular vote, and win the electoral college. It didn’t happen. In fact, the result was precisely the opposite. But how do you know when a Jew is telling the truth? They make war by means of deception, and they feign weakness when they have the advantage. When a Jew moves his lips, he is lying, and wherever one may see a rabbi, there has already been a crime. These adages are true, and they are always true because even when a Jew appears to be telling the truth, he is doing it with pretense, and with an ulterior motive that is much more important to him than any concession to fact. Donald Trump has said a lot of things which nationalists everywhere love to hear, and the next several months will be an indication of whether or not he really meant any them, and also of how he meant them. His interpretation of his words certainly differ from that of many of his supporters.

We have also noted that during the weeks and months preceding the election, many nationalist-leaning Trump supporters practically refused to process many things which Trump had said in his speeches. After the election, when protests broke out, some were even upset that Trump called for unity, understanding that White Americans should have no unity with the types of supposed people who were protesting. However Trump has not betrayed his supporters at all. They just didn’t hear his words during the campaign. For instance, in the opening moments of his so-called Gettysburg Address speech given in October, Trump made a reference of the divisions which Abraham Lincoln faced as president, and expressed hope that he himself may heal the “divisions we are living through right now”. Like it or not, that is a call for unity amongst Americans regardless of race or regardless of any other barriers, that the divisions among the races should somehow be healed. That is the real Donald Trump, whom too many people refuse to see. So they will express surprise and betrayal over the months and years to come.

Paul’s Epistle to the Hebrews, Part 8: The Distinction of Old and New Covenants

Chr20161110-Hebrews08.mp3 — Downloaded 2331 times
 
00:00

 

Paul’s Epistle to the Hebrews, Part 8: The Distinction of Old and New Covenants

Presenting the most recent chapters of Paul’s epistle to the Hebrews, which are chapters 6 and 7, through the Scriptures we hope to have established as fact that the Adamic patriarchs of the line of the first-born sons were charged with the responsibility of being preachers of righteousness, as the first-born sons are the natural priests of the Adamic family. In turn, we also hope to have elucidated how this helps to reveal for us the nature of the Melchizedek priesthood, and that the story of Melchizedek in the Genesis account was written in the manner that it was so that Melchizedek would serve as a prophetic type for the true and coming Melchizedek priest, which is Yahshua Christ. He is the heir of the Melchizedek priesthood because, being God incarnate, He is the ultimate first-born Son and He is the legitimate patriarch of the entire Adamic family.

So in Hebrews chapter 7 Paul of Tarsus had explained that the Levitical priesthood had passed, and that Christ was the high priest of an older order which was therefore of greater authority, which is the order of Melchizedek. To prove that this older priesthood was of greater authority, Paul illustrated the fact that Abraham, the ancestor of Levi, had made tithes to this Melchizedek, who was therefore greater than Abraham and who in turn had blessed Abraham. Doing this, Paul hoped to impress upon the Hebrews that their Levitical priesthood was never meant to perpetuate, as that was the original plan of God for the Melchizedek priesthood. The Melchizedek priesthood is eternal and transcends the Levitical priesthood which was only implemented for a more particular purpose: for the maintenance of the Old Testament kingdom which had also come to pass. So Paul had also explained that the Levitical priesthood and its continuous sacrifices were peculiar to the Old Covenant, and now they were eclipsed in Christ, who made one sacrifice which has an indefinite efficacy to absolve the sins of the people. Furthermore, Paul had also explained that while the Levitical high priests were temporal and they died, Christ is eternal and He lives, so there is absolutely no need for the people to have any other priest.

Political Devices: Messages for a Post-Election Nationalism

ChrSat20161105-PoliticalDevices.mp3 — Downloaded 2659 times
 
00:00

 

Messages for a Post-Election Nationalism, with Sven Longshanks and Brother Ryan. William Finck's aspiration in this podcast was an elaboration on the sentiments expressed in his recent Saxon Messsenger editorial, Political Devices

Fellowship of God's Covenant People - Scatterers and Gatherers

CHR20161104-FGCP-Finck-2016-10-30.mp3 — Downloaded 2619 times
 
00:00

 

This sermon was given at the Fellowship of God's Covenant People on Sunday, October 30th, 2016.

This visit to the Fellowship of God's Covenant People was decided on relatively short notice, and when I considered what I should present, I thought to speak on this subject of scattering and gathering upon being informed of certain events which took place recently here in this congregation. When I discussed my planned talk with Pastor Downey, he informed me that he himself had already said some of the same things which you may hear from me today. Mark even quoted from an essay on this topic which I had written a few years ago, and which I will incorporate into this discussion.

So when Mark asked me if I wanted to read what he had written, I politely declined, explaining that if I said the same things independently, that would better serve as a second witness to what he has already said here over the past few weeks. In my opinion, if we really do seek to please Christ and edify the body of Christ, we cannot entertain those who despise our core message. We cannot entertain those who in any way work contrary to our core message. None of the things which I say here today are for your admonishment. Rather, I would commend you for supporting Pastor Downey in his decision. Therefore I hope to say these things for your edification, that you have another assurance, knowing that you have made a necessary decision. I pray you continue to make such decisions in the future, because we should always expect that our faith may be tried in the fire.

Arthur Lee: White Lives Matter to God, Parts 1 & 2

 
00:00

See Arthur Lee's website IdentityStruggle.org

Talking Politics to Death, with Pastor Mark Downey

CHR20161028-TalkingPoliticstoDeath.mp3 — Downloaded 2591 times
 
00:00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arthur Lee: Face to Face with God

 
00:00

Arthur Lee of Identity Struggle presents three short lessons: FACE TO FACE WITH GODTHE GOD OF THE SCRIPTURES and FACE THE TRUTH

Clifton Emahiser on his beginnings in Christian Identity

CHR20161021-CliftonEmahiser.mp3 — Downloaded 2345 times
 
00:00

 

Clifton Emahiser on his beginnings in Christian Identity.

 

See Clifton's writings at http://emahiser.christogenea.org

 

 

 

 

The Protocols of Satan, Part 15

ChrSat20161015-Protocols_of_Satan_15.mp3 — Downloaded 3473 times
 
00:00

 


National Socialist Russian-language propaganda poster. The caption reads "Jews - A People of Contagion" showing the typical Jew next to a pile of skulls.

The Protocols of Satan, Part 15

In the last segment of our presentations of the Protocols of Satan we covered a variety of topics. First we compared the concept of the State as it was imagined by Frédéric Bastiat to the concept of a State as it was explained by Adolf Hitler. In the mind of Bastiat, the economy is greater than the State, and the state is an only a bully which may be bent to the will of one group or another who use it to gain an economic advantage for themselves over the rest of the population under its rule. This is the status quo for all of the nations of the West today. To Hitler, the State is an organism of a people, represents the people, and maintains an economy subservient to its will, in a manner which is, theoretically at least, beneficial to all of the people of the particular nation.

So to Bastiat, money comes first and the people are victims to its whims. While to Hitler, money serves the people and the people have an obligation to serve one another. The view of nation and economy which was upheld by Bastiat serves the Jewish interests, and that is the Liberalism which has prevailed throughout the West from the 19th century to this very day. The Hitlerian view of nation and economy is anathema to the Jew and had to be destroyed by the forces of Jewish capitalism which have come to dominate all nations. I do not know if we could find better models by which to contrast these important differences in economic philosophy, which have played a significant role in the events of modern history.

For over two hundred years, the world has been caught in a deception, the supposed between Marxism and Capitalism, the dichotomy of Marx vs. Bastiat sold to the people and accepted, even disseminated, by the shallow minds of mainstream academia. In reality, both systems have profitted the same globalist Jews, and neither system is good for the nations. This is quite the same as the dichotomy between Calvin and Arminius, a false dichotomy offered to the people, who will choose one side or the other when both sides have always been partially right, and partially wrong. Caught in the dichotomy between two seemingly opposing and heavily promoted views, all other options tend to be ignored. This is especially true if they contain elements which can appear to be found in one or the other of the views being promoted. So, for instance, Adolf Hitler’s national socialism, which was actually a sound economic system that eliminated a usury-based currency, is to this day dismissed by shallow minds simply because they have accepted the confusion that Marxism is socialism. In truth, Marxism is not socialism, and before Marx, socialism had an entirely different meaning than it is perceived to have today.

Pages