Blogs

See the Emma West Tram video at The Saxon Messenger

Early this month a nineteen-year-old White man, Danny O'Shea, was stabbed to death in Canning Town, and both the police and the man's mother soon began making excuses for the race of the perpetrators, who were black. This same scene plays out with different actors hundreds of times across England each year as more and more women are raped, men are robbed, beaten and murdered, and White businesses are looted. In past times, this was called an invasion. Today, the English people, having been smitten with the disease of jewish liberalism, their destruction is called immigration and in that manner it has been made legal! Where are the men of England, when England is literally in its darkest hour ever? Danny O'Shea was chased down like a dog by a gang of blacks, and stabbed in the neck to die in the street. The men of England won't find their spines at the bottom of Dave Jones' locker. He doesn't even have a spine of his own. Yet if the men of England don't soon find the backbone somewhere, that they may stand up for England, soon there shall be no England to worry about finding.

It is a sad reflection on them that a woman must come forward to say the things that they themselves cannot, or rather will not say. The eighth Psalm tells us that “Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast thou ordained strength because of thine enemies, that thou mightest still the enemy and the avenger.” Thus is Emma West. Whether the men of England don't care for England any longer, or whether they have been emasculated by tyrannical hate-speech laws and therefore do not have the courage to stand up, does not matter. Emma West is your prophetess, and the last prophetess you may get. She is your modern-day Jonah, warning you to repent, or to be destroyed!

The most telling aspect of the Emma West tram video was what was going on in the background. While Emma made her appeal for the defense of England, apparently White British women in the background felt a sudden need to coddle the offended black savages. With the first mention of Africa, they immediately took to stroking and embracing the beast as if they were soothing an injured dog. Another seemingly White woman then began assailing Emma West, evidently outraged that she had the courage to speak her mind. The things that she said, all England had better consider. Danny O'Shea's blood, and the blood of thousands like him, is on the hands of these sick White liberals who have created and defended this climate in London, where all of the wild beasts of the jungle are allowed to roam freely and devour the sheep, as the liberals continue to embrace them. Emma West was arrested. Danny O'Shea's murderers roam free. The animals have certainly taken over the farm!

-William Finck

The Right Far and Faux

by William Finck

Originally written for The Saxon Messenger 

There is the far Right and there is the faux Right. True White nationalists do not kill their White brethren. Not even when they disagree with them politically or religiously do true nationalists kill their White brethren. This is because true nationalists are nationalists because they love their brethren above all else, and that love for their brethren is what led them to become nationalists. The real far Right is nationalist. And real Christianity insists that Christians love their brethren above all but God Himself.

However in the West, there is a faux Right that has a different agenda. It is nationalist, but not for its own perceived nation. It is nationalist for that artificial state in the Middle East called “Israel”. Most all of the adherents of this faux right nationalism are Jews, or brain-washed false Christians, called “Judeo-Christians”, who may as well be Jews. Since the nationalistic allegiance of Jews is not and cannot truly be with the host nations that they inhabit, they cannot even be considered nationalist, or even conservative, or even as being on the right of the political spectrum. They can only be considered Zionist and Zionism does not really care for the left-right paradigms of the individual Western democracies. Many so-called conservative Jews, known generally as neocons, adapted the designation neoconservative because they were mostly leftist Jews who had infiltrated American conservatism. They were new to conservatism, but they were never and are not now true conservatives. They were and are Zionist Leftist Bolsheviks looking to redefine conservatism, something that real conservatives have failed to realize. They have not changed their ideology, like the leopard cannot change its spots. Rather, they have infiltrated and usurped the true Right. There are some non-Jews among them who are apparently Christians, but not true Christians in practice. For rather than loving their brethren, as the Bible commands them to do, they love the Jews, those eternal enemies of Christ.

Independence Hall, as it appears below to the right, is a lot like America itself. The top third having long ago fallen apart, all that is left is covered with a facade, while the bottom two-thirds is totally exposed and crumbling.

Why pick on Philadelphia? Because it is the cultural center of the founding of this nation. Of the nation's original great cities, while they all had a role in creating our heritage, none are so worthy as Philadelphia to be considered the birthplace of these United States. But today Philadelphia is also a good representative of what has now become of our once-great heritage: we have given it away to aliens who neither appreciate nor even understand it, and they never will be able to understand it. We have done this at the expense of our own children, or at least, of the children we may have had if it were not for the burdensome taxes of the welfare state. Yet it is not wholly our own people who have given it away, but those among us - those who from the beginning have always been contrary to us, who have seduced us into giving it away. Today it is their monuments which are quickly coming to dominate Philadelphia, and they are rewriting our history in order for them to make it even easier to corrupt and destroy our nation. The proof lies open for all of those with eyes to see.

This is the latest Saxon Messenger editorial:

Not that we even accept the false Liberal vs. Conservative as paradigm – for both ideologies as they are practiced in the West today are severely flawed - however here we shall comment upon the blatant hypocrisy of Liberalism when it comes to the issue of race. It is the Liberal who insists upon programs – in the United States anyway – such as so-called equal opportunity and affirmative action, unlimited third-world immigration into traditionally White nations and massive relief and aid campaigns for the people who remain behind in those third-world nations, especially whenever there is some sort of natural disaster. We have, in the past, compared these actions and attitudes to the relative indifference towards White areas hit by equal calamity.

I saw this sign at the National Zoo in Washington this past Saturday, and just had to take a picture of it. It says: “Society. Think about it. Apes do.” This is more or less a slogan repeated in several other places at the zoo, so as I walked around looking at the animals – inside and outside of the cages – I did think about it.

The word ape is more or less an ambiguous term used to describe a wide assortment of critters, including orangutans, gorillas and chimpanzees, which are of the biological families Pongidae.or Hominidae. All of these have 48 chromosomes, and a few hybrids among them – often in captivity - have been known to exist. However, in “normal” ape society reproductive unions between these different species of ape hominids generally do not occur. The National Zoo - evidently not caring about compliance with equal opportunity housing standards - segregates its ape residents by species. 

Humans are also hominids, but having only 46 chromosomes they are clearly distinct from apes. However, quite often the differences between species in the other animal families are far more subtle than the differences between the various races of humans – whom scientists nevertheless generally insist are all of the same species. The supposed scientific methods for classifying the various families of the animal kingdom into species are inconsistent and ambiguous, clearly politicized, and biased when it comes to humans. In fact, many so-called scientists are now attempting to dismantle even racial distinctions, claiming that they are a social construct. At the same time, pharmaceutical companies are recognizing racial differences and creating race-targeted medications. Yet examining the histories and achievements of the various races as they exist in their aboriginal forms, before any of them were influenced by rather recent colonization or resettlement outside of their own historic habitats, it is quite clear instead that society is a racial construct, and that the scientists are wrong.

While different varieties of ape do not readily interbreed, different varieties of humans do. Walking around the zoo, I observed White men with Negro partners and mixed children, White men with Oriental partners and mixed children, and Negro men with White women and mixed children. Hardly something one may see among the apes of Africa or the South Pacific, in places where different species of ape inhabit the same areas. While apes are generally considered to be less intelligent than humans, mate selection is one area where it is fully apparent that dumber is indeed smarter.

Disdaining The Culture of Fear

There are extant accounts from the tenth century - over a thousand years ago - that many Christians thought the end of the age would come with the end of the first millennium. Actually, there were dozens of times during the first thousand years from the birth of Christ that such predictions came and went. Other popular dates for the end of the world were 1666 and 1715. The year 1715 was actually conjectured by a man as brilliant as Isaac Newton himself, for it was found in one of his notebooks. (See http://www.bible.ca/pre-date-setters.htm or a copy of the text at http://christogenea.org/endtimedates.) In the 19th century a certain preacher who was an early leader of the “Seventh-Day Adventist” cult made a series of predictions, based on certain interpretations of numbers found in the Bible, claiming that the return of Yahshua Christ and the end of this wicked age would transpire in 1844. Needless to say, today, a hundred and sixty-six years later, we are still waiting. Yet many other cults have made similar predictions since then, and they have all gone by the wayside, while few call the leaders of those cults into account – and those calls are almost always ignored.

Before the dawn of the 20th century, Jewish bankers and merchants had long been using their pocketbook influence to work their way into a position where they began marrying into the aristocratic families of Germany. This situation is inevitable where you have a minority that works its way into a host population, and where that minority also happens to have the ability to create its own paper money – therefore having practically unlimited funds with which to corrupt the host society. The average Christian had no use at all for money, and especially paper money. Trade was conducted in barter and taxes were paid in kind. For many centuries in Medieval Europe usury was an abomination, since it is antithetical to Christianity, and so the Jews – who have always been usurers – naturally became the bankers to European nobility, profiting immensely in those circumstances by pandering to the desires of the weak.

The ADL, or Anti-Defamation League, a sort of legal protection racket that endeavors to ensure that no Jew is ever criticized, regardless of the merits of the criticism, has recently mentioned both Eli James and myself in an article on their website (click here for the article). Upon mentioning the common name which describes, in part, our particular Christian theology, “Christian Identity”, they immediately give a link to a description of a list of men who were all allegedly Christian Identity adherents and who all supposedly committed crimes of one sort or another (for which click here).

Of course, the ADL’s inference is that all Christian Identists are criminals, or at least potential criminals. This is pre-judgement, and guilt by association. Is it not true that in practically every facet of life today people are instructed not to pre-judge anyone, by faith or by association? Hasn’t such a practice recently been called “profiling” and condemned in the Jewish-controlled media, with much fanfare? In fact, a search of the word “profiling” on the internal search engine of the ADL’s own website produces a list of articles over five pages long. This list of articles makes it quite clear that the ADL is highly concerned with nearly every type of racial profiling too, and not only against Jews. However the ADL is certainly not concerned with the profiling that they themselves do: the profiling of White Christians! For this reason Jesus (Yahshua) Christ warned us repeatedly concerning the hypocrisy of the scribes and Pharisees – His murderers.

On June 20th, 2009, in Binghamton NY, it was discovered by this writer that in this day even the American Legion, an organization which claims to be a defender of the liberties which we have in this nation as expressed in the Bill of Rights of the United States’ Constitution, does not have the backbone to defend those rights. We – meaning myself along with an unofficial group of traditional conservative Christians (as opposed to zionist judeo-so-called-christians) – had long scheduled and publicly announced a meeting whereat we had planned on hosting several Christian speakers (myself included), all who were planning to discuss the context and substance of the epistles of Paul of Tarsus which are found in our Bibles. There is hardly a threat to the peace and security of the State or to any particular group in doing that, is there?

There are many apparently well-intentioned Christians today who are promoting certain forms of political activism, wishing to reform the government of this once-great republic, and to turn it back to the interests of its natural-born citizens. For this reason we see and hear of demonstrations, “tea parties”, appeals to the original Constitution of the nation, and even state secessions, civil war and armed insurrection. Yet none of this is Scriptural, and indeed, the parasite-infested carcass that was once our body of government certainly cannot ever be reformed. While surely it is possible that the schemers on Wall Street may be able to breathe some new life into the beast, and keep its heart beating awhile longer, the final outcome is nevertheless inevitable, and Babylon shall fall.

The Saxon and Keltic peoples who colonized the North American continent in the 17th and 18th centuries were self-reliant Christian men and women, who for the most part were moral and faithful, whose God was the God of the Bible and whose guiding light was Yahshua (or Jesus) Christ. As Christians everywhere should do, they looked to their God for His inspiration of their own ability and initiative to solve all of their problems and to meet all of their challenges. From these ideals alone came the founding documents of this nation – some of the greatest political documents Man has ever devised – and in short time the greatest, most ingenious and productive nation which the world has ever known emerged upon that sure foundation: for these United States are the only nation (properly a federation of nation states) in the history of Man which was ever founded wholly upon Christian principles.

The Bible tells us that Yahweh (simply “God” to most people) created Adam. The creation of Adam is first described in Genesis 1:26-27. The word translated “man” in this passage is indeed the same word, and refers to the same being, described in more detail in the next part of Genesis, which begins at 2:4. Many years ago these were separate scrolls and separate accounts – albeit about much the same thing – later consolidated into a single “book” by men. The third part of Genesis begins at 5:1, and in another way the story of the creation of “adam” man is again related. It turns out, however, that the Hebrew meaning of “adam” isn’t quite the same as the modern meaning of the word “man”, which nowadays is basically used to describe any full-grown male anthropoid. In fact, “adam” signifies only those full-grown anthropoids of which the blood can be seen through the skin. This condition is called ruddiness, and is peculiar to the (true) White race. This is also evident further on in the Bible, to anyone who actually knows history. A thorough examination of the families of Genesis chapter 10 reveals that many of these nations can be identified in history and archaeology, and that they were all originally White nations. Many of them eventually became “arab” (a Hebrew word which means “mixed”), or even negroid, through a process known as miscegenation, but originally they were all White.

6/29/08 (rewritten & revised 10/06/08, 1/15/09):

Fascism is not the ideal political system for Christians, however it is a far better system than the two alternatives which the popular social theorists and the princes of this world offer to us today: Socialism (Marxism) or Capitalism (maybe it should be called Rothschildism).

In the capitalist system, capital is invested in an enterprise, which then functions solely fror the advantage of the “owner”, or shareholder, in a way that stresses the maximization of profits at the expense of all else. The only legal responsibility of any corporation is to work for the enrichment of the shareholder – aside from the restrictions which the government places upon it, such as tax laws and agency compliance.

In the fascist system, capital may indeed profit the owner, or shareholder, yet the State ensures that the capital is invested and functions in such a way that the nation as a whole benefits, or at least that the interests of the nation are safeguarded. In many ways, even the United States has adopted a sort of fascism, albeit a pharisaical sort, through the burdensome regulations of its many agencies. Yet these do not protect the interests of the nation in the same manner or to the extent that the fascist system would.

Originally written 6/29/08, revised 10/06/08, minor revisions 1/15/09:

For the reasons opined here in previous posts – even without discussing the perils of miscegenation – it can clearly be countenanced that the racist nation is the nation which endures, and a non-racist nation cannot possibly continue in its traditions and cultural institutions without falling into intermittent states of chaos, strife, and poverty: its culture eventually decaying into a shadow, even a remnant, of its former grandeur.

6/25/08:

The White liberal is a misogenist: he must hate his race, because he insists that it should be mixed with the non-White races. Therefore, the White liberal is a cancer cell in the body of the White race, and every mongrelized family is a malignant tumor. If the average White liberal (usually a simple-minded follower of ideas which are perceived to be lofty, just, and good, but in reality are purely evil) could know what is really in the mind of the average negro or ladino, chances are that he may very well rethink his support of multiculturalism and diversity, unless, of course, he truly does relish the idea of the destruction of the White race.

When the White liberal hears the slogan “social justice”, it very often invokes thoughts such as those represented by the slogans of the wicked French revolutionaries, such as “Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite”, and the supposed “universal brotherhood of man”, or that idea – always taken out of context – that somehow “all men are created equal”, which was expressed in the American Declaration of Independence.

There are only two possible options: one is either racial, or one is genocidal. The racist seeks to preserve the genetic heritage, the nature and the culture of his own race. The opposite is the misogenist (not to be confused with misogynist), which is one who hates his race, because miscegeny – the mixing of the races – is a cause of genocide, and is a destroyer of all races. Genesis chapter eleven, where even one race – the Adamic or White – was separated into separate nations by Yahweh their God, along with Deuteronomy 32:4 and Acts 17:26, demonstrate the fact that racial and national separatism is defined and mandated by Yahweh God. Therefore, multiculturalism is rebellion against Yahweh God. The Tower of Babel event, although only the White race which descended from Noah was involved, is nevertheless representative of a model of multi- culturalism. Babel, from which we also have the name Babylon, is a Hebrew word which means confusion.

[Note that originally the blog was a separate website from Christogenea.]

Today is the first day of theblog.christogenea.org, yet some of the opening posts here are going to be from notes that I’ve been making and keeping for some time now. Hopefully they will not be found to be dated.

This blog will not be for the faint-hearted, and is meant for those viewers of my website – christogenea.org – who appreciate the material posted there. This blog will contain material which shall be deemed divisive, and even labeled as “hate” by all those who themselves are full of hate, but are too ignorant to know it. If you fall into that category, you can go to niflheim for all I care. Unless you have something truly constructive to say (even if it is criticism), you are wasting your time. Your comments here will be deleted and you are not welcome. If you are a reader of christogenea.org and visit this blog, thank you!

“For the terrible one is brought to nought, and the scorner is consumed, and all that watch for iniquity are cut off: That make a man an offender for a word, and lay a snare for him that reproveth in the gate, and turn aside the just for a thing of nought.” (Isaiah 29:20-21, KJV)