Explaining Two-Seedline: Pragmatic Genesis

The material for this program was not put into writing, however here are some of the notes and scripture references employed.

One Adam, multiple grammatical forms
 

In the following examples from Scripture, we will see instances where the word Adam appears in four forms. ADAM, the generic noun, HA-ADAM, the noun accompanied with a definite article, and ETH-HA-ADAM, the article and noun further accompanied with the Hebrew word eth, which by itself is often used as a preposition, and also AL-HA-ADAM, another preposition with the article and noun.

This word eth, according to Strong's Concordance, has other meanings, but when it is used as a prefix to a noun it is “generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition” Strong goes on to explain that for this reason it is unrepresented in English when used in this manner. Likewise, the Enhanced Strong's that is built into the BibleWorks software says that it is “an untranslatable mark of the accusative case”, which in the language of grammarians is precisely what the original Strong's says with different terms. It is a feature of grammar which has nothing to do with the nature of the object itself.

Explaining Two-Seedline, Part 2: Pragmatic Genesis, Genesis Chapter 1 - [rather incomplete] Program Notes

To summarize last week's program, if one is going to distinguish between Adam, eth-ha-Adam, and ha-Adam in the creation account of Genesis, assuming that these grammatical terms represent different creations of Adam, then those distinctions must hold up throughout all Scripture. However with all certainty, they do not hold up at all. They do not even hold up so far as Genesis chapter 5! In truth, they are only grammatical differences, and all references to Adam represent the same Adamic man, as Paul of Tarsus said, “the first man Adam was made a living soul”, telling us that the one and only Adam of Genesis was the FIRST MAN. While it is fully apparent that there were other hominids on earth before Adam, our mistake from the beginning was in considering them to be man.

Explaining Two-Seedline, Part 3: Pragmatic Genesis, Genesis Chapter 2 - Program Notes

KJV Genesis 2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. 3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.

Here we have the end of what I would term the First Scroll of Genesis. In ancient times, they did not have books as we know them today. Rather, papyrus was cut and glued in order to form a long scroll which was then used for writing. The scrolls could be rolled up and tied to keep them together. The original writing of Moses was most likely a collection of these scrolls which, once books were developed, were later concatenated into a single volume. However it cannot be ruled out that Moses may have originally used clay tablets rather than scrolls. Clay tablets were used for writing in Mesopotamia all throughout this period, and some of them contained rather long stories. The first books made on a large scale came much later, and were made of vellum which is made from animal skins, which was cut uniformly and bound at one end. There are archaeological discoveries of small books made in part from metal sheets, and also scrolls made from metal sheets, however these were neither practical nor was their use widespread.

A discussion of Genesis chapter 3, through Genesis 3:7. Materials used in this program are found in the essays Shemitic Idioms and Genesis Chapter Three by William Finck and Special Notice to All Who Deny Two-Seedline, #5 by Clifton Emahiser.

Recapitulation in Genesis: Chapters 1&2, 4&5 and 10&11.

Genesis Chapter 6: The flood and Two-Seedline

There was an interruption due to a technical problem with Talkshoe and one minute was cut from the tape at 137:01. I never did answer the question which Sword Brethren posed, asking if Nimrod had opposed himself to God by the establishment of his empire. I would answer in the affirmative.

Christogenea resources cited for this program:

The Race of Genesis 10

Patriarchal Chronology

The Call of Abraham, The Scriptural definition of "all the families" and "the nations".

The sacrifice of Isaac, why Yahweh commanded it of Abraham. The story of Jacob and Esau, part 1.

Jacob & Esau. This seems to have been the last presentation with Sword Brethren. 

The descendants of Ishmael and Esau.

The Three Tribes of Judah, Part 1

The Three Tribes of Judah, Part 2, with Clifton Emahiser. See Clifton's paper, The Three Tribes of Judah. See also Classical Records of Trojan-Roman-Judah, here at Christogenea.

Bristol, Tennessee "Pastor" grovels for a donation from one of those "spots" in our "feasts of charity".

Jude 12-13: " 12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots; 13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever."

An answer to all those who would infect Christian Identity with universalist ideas by abusing the stories of the Gibeonites, the Canaanite Woman, the Samaritan Woman and the Parable of the Good Samaritan.

Satan is not in heaven (Revelation 12).

Lucifer is not Satan, but every Lucifer is a satan (Isaiah 14). What Lucifer really means is explained fully.

The King of Tyrus was not Satan, nor was the Prince of Tyrus (Ezekiel 28). Where is the Garden of God?

The Son of Perdition is not Satan, but rather is the antichrist Jew and they are all satans (2 Thessalonians 2).

The Romans crushed Satan in Jerusalem, but he later moved to Pergamos! So how can he be in heaven? (Romans 16:20, Revelation 2)

and more...

This program is a discussion based upon Appendix B of the Christogenea New Testament, The Devil and Satan. The program was meant to be a recapitulation of some of the basic proofs of Two-Seedline theology expressed in the Pragmatic Genesis series, as well as a discussion of some of the false claims of our detractors and some of the differences which we have with the older Two-Seedline teachers such as Wesley Swift and Bertrand Comparet, and the reasons for those differences.

In this program we discussed evidence of the transition from a racist, nationalist attitude in Egypt circa 2300 BC to a diverse, multi-racial attitude circa perhaps 1700 BC.

We also discussed ancient Egyptian and Sumerian attitudes concerning life after death, the continuation of the spirit of Man, the underworld, Hades or the Netherworld, demons and other related topics, first from Egyptian myths, and then using the ancient Sumerian legend Inanna's Descent to the Nether World as the focal point for the discussion.