Saxon Messenger Issue No. 50, March 2018

William Finck

Get your copy of the latest issue of The Saxon Messenger, an online PDF magazine and a project of Christogenea.

This issue was indeed on its way to completion two months ago, and circumstances beyond our control inhibited its publication until now, the end of May. Optimistically, we will nevertheless call it a March issue, and hope to catch up on our quarterly schedule by September.

This issue of the Saxon Messenger features:

Christian Identity: What Difference Does it Make?, James Fields did Nothing Wrong, Knock, Knock, Knoxville, The League of the South in Tallahassee and The Protocols of Satan, Part 7, all by William Finck, 5G Wireless: a ridiculous front for global control by Jon Rappoport, Tech Overlords Initiate Online Cleansing, concerning the vaccination debate, from Natural News, Sacrificing Girls to Political Correctness by Tim Dieppe of Christian Concern, Easy Meat:The Power of Political Correctness by Peter McLoughlin, The Architects of Evil: The Frankfurt School by Lasha Darkmoon et al, and more...

 

Click here to purchase this issue in print.

End Times Update 5, May 2018

William Finck
ChrSat20180526EndTimes04May2018.mp3

This evening we discuss the history of immigration in America, the historic attitudes towards immigration, and how the sudden change in policy in 1965 led to the fulfillment of prophecy we are currently witnessing as all of the world's non-White peoples are being led by Satan against the Camp of the Saints.

We also discuss national average IQ and how it can lead to the anticipated Fall of Babylon as immigration results in White minorities throughout the West.

Below: Lyndon Johnson's remarks as he signed the Immigration Act in 1965

On the Gospel of John, Part 2: The Light of the World

William Finck
John 1:1-10
CHR20180525-John02.mp3

On the Gospel of John, Part 2: The Light of the World

Introducing our presentation of the Gospel of John in the opening segment of this series, we gave evidence from the earliest post-apostolic Christian writers, the so-called Church Fathers, and from the texts of those books of our Bibles which are attributed to John, which is sufficient to demonstrate that one and the same John the apostle – the young man who of all the apostles had been closest to Christ – was indeed the author of the Revelation, the first epistle of John, and this Gospel. There was also circumstantial evidence given to help establish that John was indeed the author of the two shorter epistles which have been attributed to him from the earliest times.

Here we shall offer a brief summary of our discussion. Little is known of the life of John after the early chapters of Acts, and he last appears in Scripture in Jerusalem in 47 AD, in the events which are recorded in Acts chapter 15 and the early verses of Galatians chapter 2. Later in his life, ostensibly after the deaths of the elder James around 62 AD in Jerusalem and Paul of Tarsus about that same time in Rome, John is in Ephesus where he committed this Gospel to writing. Then during the reign of Domitian, some time after 81 AD John was exiled to Patmos on account of his Christian profession, which is where he received the Revelation. After the death of Domitian in 96 AD, John was able to return to Ephesus. If the Revelation was not already committed to writing, it certainly was after John’s return, which is indicated in the accounts of the early Christian writers. All of John’s three epistles were also written in Ephesus, and very likely around this late time, as John fulfilled the role of an elder and apostle to the Christian assemblies at Ephesus and the neighboring districts. This John had reportedly done until his death some time during the reign of Trajan, which began in 98 and ended in 117 AD. If John were 16 when the ministry of Christ began in 28 AD, he would have been no younger than 86 when he died.

The Protocols of Satan, Part 38: William Jennings Bryan, the Last Viable Political Opposition

William Finck
ChrSat20180519-Protocols_of_Satan_38.mp3

The Protocols of Satan, Part 38: William Jennings Bryan, the Last Viable Political Opposition

The following is a presentation of part of a speech by William Jennings Bryan which was published in The Barnes Review in their March/April 2000 issue. We are presenting this here this evening, as well as an earlier and longer article focusing on Bryan’s political career which was written by Michael Collins Piper in 1996, in order to show that there was viable political opposition to the internationalist designs which ultimately prevailed in the late 19th and early 20th century American politics. However we see William Jennings Bryan as the last of such viable political opposition, and he was defeated time and again, until he finally relented – and later regretted it. Of course, later on there was Huey Long, but the plutocrats had him killed before he ever became a threat.

On the Gospel of John, Part 1: The Word Made Flesh

William Finck
Background, John 1:1-5
CHR20180518-John01.mp3

On the Gospel of John, Part 1: The Word Made Flesh

Christianity is Divine Truth which stands opposed to worldly philosophies. Therefore the LOGOS cannot be described in accordance with worldly philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. Anyone who attempts to do so, fails miserably.

Here we shall endeavor a presentation and commentary of the Gospel of John. This Gospel is unlike any of the others, which parallel one another in many ways and which are for that reason called the Synoptic Gospels. None of the writers of these other gospels were witnesses to the entire ministry of Christ, and therefore they also relied on accounts provided by others, in whole or in part. Before discussing John, we shall explain this briefly, but we must warn that the documentation or reasoning which supports these brief explanations is found throughout our other commentaries, and we can not repeat it all here. We will, however, see some of our evidence in the words of the early Christian writers as we cite them in our discussion of John.

Does Prosperity Gospel Belong in Christian Identity? And Other Topics

William Finck
ChrSat20180512-ProsperityGospelEtc.mp3

Does Prosperity Gospel Belong in Christian Identity?

To begin this evening, I am compelled to talk about a topic that I really do not like to talk about at all. But because there always seems to be some sort of controversy swirling around what I do and say at Christogenea, sometimes I am compelled to discuss certain things. I like to think that people choose to support my ministry because they understand that Christian Identity is truth, that it is the only truth, and that it needs to be set on a solid academic foundation from which it can be disseminated to more and more of our White European race, to those for whom the Faith is intended. We undertake that endeavor with the hope that eventually this truth prevails among our people. Supporting my ministry, people are showing their faith in my work, a vote of confidence in my ability to contribute in that endeavor.

Building that academic foundation takes a lot of work in research and writing, and then disseminating the results requires a lot of cost and a lot of labor for websites and servers and related expenses. Christogenea has in excess of a thousand dollars a month in such expenses, although that cost also covers a lot of other Christian Identity and White Nationalist websites. But this is not a fund-raiser, or an appeal for funds. Rather, it is to set the record straight about a few things, because of the divisions we have had within our Christian Identity community over this past year.

Pitfalls Found in Biblical Research Materials, Part 1 with Clifton Emahiser

William Finck
CHR20180511-Emahiser-Pitfalls.mp3

 

Pitfalls Found in Biblical Research Materials, Part 1 with Clifton Emahiser

Last August Clifton Emahiser, being 90 years old at the time, had taken a bad fall in his home. At that time he realized that he really could not live alone safely any longer, and we brought him here to Florida to stay with us. In the meantime, just before his accident Clifton had sent me three new short essays to proofread, which I never got to until now. So we will begin trying to make that up to him with this evening’s presentation. Here we have Clifton Emahiser with us once again, to present and discuss one of those short essays, which he had titled The Pitfalls Found In Biblical Commentaries, Lexicons & Dictionaries.

It seems to me that Clifton may have planned for this to be another multi-part series, since while the title is broad in scope, here he mainly focuses on the rather recently-developed denominational doctrines of Futurism and Preterism, and how they have affected modern Christian thinking which is reflected in their inclusion in certain popular Study Bibles and Commentaries. While Clifton has treated this topic in the past, here it is presented in a somewhat different context, and he goes further to show how recent these and other ideas about Scripture have been developed by certain denominations.

So now we shall present Clifton’s essay, along with our own comments and discussion:

The Pitfalls Found In Biblical Commentaries, Lexicons & Dictionaries, by Clifton Emahiser

While some of these Biblical helps are better than others, even the best have some serious errors! For instance some Bible cross-references can lead one astray, so let’s consider some of the better center-references found in a few Bibles:

If you have a King James Version Bible with the proper center reference, you can very readily prove Two Seedline teaching with it, for it will take you from one supporting verse of Scripture to another almost endlessly on the subject. (Not that the King James Version is an especially advisable Bible to use for study, as it is alleged to contain approximately 27,000 translation mistakes.)

This is What Mind Control Looks Like

William Finck

When the entire mainstream media is singing the same tune, when dozens, if not hundreds, of local television stations are repeating the same lines as if they are reading from the same script, you know that behind the scenes somewhere far away is one person who is doing all of their thinking for them. This is mind control, where everyone is a brainless drone simply repeating someone else's ideas.

The Protocols of Satan, Part 37: The Menace of the Money Power

William Finck
ChrSat20180505-Protocols_of_Satan_37-MenaceMoneyPower.mp3

The Protocols of Satan, Part 37: The Menace of the Money Power

In our last presentation of these Protocols of Satan, we sought to present the most authoritative and earliest proofs of the connections between Judaism and Bolshevism, so we employed many citations from the earliest official American and British government reports on Bolshevism and the revolution in Russia in order to do so. Then, as part of this same endeavor, we presented a booklet titled Judaism and Bolshevism, a collection of three articles from a publication called the Catholic Gazette, which were compiled by a Mr. A. Homer and published in 1933, in order to further establish the asserted connections. There are many other sources, and several other early and authoritative publications, which we may have presented to further prove this assertion, however we felt that these were most sufficient for our purposes here.

Now we are going to present another booklet, this one published in 1946, which not only reasserts the connections of the Jews to Bolshevism, but also describes the Jewish bankers who were most active in its success, as well as their plans for putting all of the governments of the world under their economic yoke. All of this is a prelude necessary to understand the veracity and the fulfillment of that paragraph of Protocol No. 3 upon which we currently focus.

Interview with Patrick Little, Senate Candidate

William Finck
CHR20180504-PatrickLittle.mp3

Tonight we interview US Senate Candidate Patrick Little. Afterwards we discuss Patrick's candidacy and the challenge and necessity of bringing the truth of Jewish Identity to light.

Hours before this interview was posted at Christogenea, Patrick Little was ejected from the California GOP convention. The state GOP spokesman, Matt Fleming, who is obviously a cuck for the devil, issued a mealy-mouthed statement about "religious bigotry" that has nothing to do with Patrick Little's contention concerning Jews in American government.