The Protocols of Satan, Part 38: William Jennings Bryan, the Last Viable Political Opposition

The following is a presentation of part of a speech by William Jennings Bryan which was published in The Barnes Review in their March/April 2000 issue. We are presenting this here this evening, as well as an earlier and longer article focusing on Bryan’s political career which was written by Michael Collins Piper in 1996, in order to show that there was viable political opposition to the internationalist designs which ultimately prevailed in the late 19th and early 20th century American politics. However we see William Jennings Bryan as the last of such viable political opposition, and he was defeated time and again, until he finally relented – and later regretted it. Of course, later on there was Huey Long, but the plutocrats had him killed before he ever became a threat.

Imperialism Is Not The American Way by William Jennings Bryan

The editor of The Barnes Review introduces the speech with a description of a cartoon which was reproduced on the issue’s front cover:

At the dawn of the 20th century, when “the old horse got too slow for Uncle Sam” (as the Judge cartoon which is our cover illustration this month so quaintly put it), one of the most vociferous critics of the newly burgeoning U.S. internationalism (soon to be called "gunboat diplomacy") was populist figure William Jennings Bryan, known as “the Great Commoner.”

The cartoon, pictured here, may have been better described. According to Wikipedia, “Judge was a weekly satirical magazine published in the United States from 1881 to 1947.” Reportedly the magazine openly supported the Republican Party. However the many Victor Gillam cartoons which it published expressed sentiments which were against immigration, internationalism and imperialism, things which the Republican Party had supported. William Jennings Bryan was anti-Imperialist and populist Democrat.

Does Prosperity Gospel Belong in Christian Identity?

To begin this evening, I am compelled to talk about a topic that I really do not like to talk about at all. But because there always seems to be some sort of controversy swirling around what I do and say at Christogenea, sometimes I am compelled to discuss certain things. I like to think that people choose to support my ministry because they understand that Christian Identity is truth, that it is the only truth, and that it needs to be set on a solid academic foundation from which it can be disseminated to more and more of our White European race, to those for whom the Faith is intended. We undertake that endeavor with the hope that eventually this truth prevails among our people. Supporting my ministry, people are showing their faith in my work, a vote of confidence in my ability to contribute in that endeavor.

Building that academic foundation takes a lot of work in research and writing, and then disseminating the results requires a lot of cost and a lot of labor for websites and servers and related expenses. Christogenea has in excess of a thousand dollars a month in such expenses, although that cost also covers a lot of other Christian Identity and White Nationalist websites. But this is not a fund-raiser, or an appeal for funds. Rather, it is to set the record straight about a few things, because of the divisions we have had within our Christian Identity community over this past year.

Some of our friends – for which reason they are now former friends – have taken to teaching the so-called Prosperity Gospel within Christian Identity, and to us that is a grievous sin. So they are preaching that you can use a so-called “law of attraction” in order to gain material wealth, and that Jesus really wants you to have an “abundant life”. They speak of giving so that you can receive, and ostensibly, if you give to them, you can receive many times more than you gave. One of them has even taken to teaching that you do not need any God in heaven. Rather, he teaches that God is in you and therefore you can create whatever you want for yourself, if only you would just believe. Here we are going to play a two-and-a-half-minute clip of that person speaking. This is Brother Ryan, from a video he posted called Facts vs. Truth, from 11:41 to 14:13. Please suffer through this so that we can address some of his errors.

Tonight we interview US Senate Candidate Patrick Little. Afterwards we discuss Patrick's candidacy and the challenge and necessity of bringing the truth of Jewish Identity to light with Don Fox.

Hours before this interview was posted at Christogenea, Patrick Little was ejected from the California GOP convention. The state GOP spokesman, Matt Fleming, who is obviously a cuck for the devil, issued a mealy-mouthed statement about "religious bigotry" that has nothing to do with Patrick Little's contention concerning Jews in American government.

Christianity in the Old Testament, Part 6, Israel in the New Testament, by Bertrand Comparet, with Commentary

Here we are going to present, critique, and hopefully elaborate on Bertrand Comparet’s sermon, Israel in the New Testament. These programs are intended to both honor and elaborate on the works of Bertrand Comparet, and to offer any corrections which are necessary, because all men are prone to making errors, and no man can avoid that fate. We are doing this as part of our series on Christianity in the Old Testament because the two subjects are actually a single subject. Comparet himself referred to this sermon in his original presentation of Christianity in the Old Testament. Regardless of the propaganda which is spewed by the denominational churches, both the Old and New Testaments represent racially-based covenants made with the same group of people. One may pick-and-choose passages in the New Testament in order to attempt to dispute that, but those passages are being taken out-of-context when such interpretations can be clearly shown to conflict with many plain statements made in either Testament which refute the validity of any universalist interpretation.

To the sincere Christian, Judaism should have no standing or consideration whatsoever. The promise of a future new covenant was made explicitly in both Jeremiah and Ezekiel. The condemnation revoking the old covenant was spelled out explicitly in both Hosea and Zechariah. The Jews as a people have never fulfilled any of the many promises made to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob concerning the children of Israel. They will never fulfill them, because the Old Testament is a Christian book. With all certainty, it can be shown in history that the Keltic and Germanic peoples have their origins in ancient Israel and Mesopotamia, and that they did indeed fulfill all of those promises. They also accepted the new covenant that was explicitly promised for Israel, and they accepted Yahshua Christ the Messiah of Israel, who came “to confirm the promises made unto the fathers”, as Paul of Tarsus attests. This is the basic premise of Bertrand Comparet’s sermon, it is a true premise, and now we shall commence to hear it from him...

The Protocols of Satan, Part 36: Judaism and Bolshevism

All throughout this series on the Protocols of Satan we have been asserting the fact that Bolshevism is a product of Judaism. So this evening we are further quantifying that assertion so that there is sufficient documentation incorporated into this series on the Protocols, even though we have presented much of this in different ways at various times in the past. For example, there is a lengthy series wherein we had presented the entire Russia No. 1 Report, with commentary, and it is still available at our Mein Kampf Project website. So as part of our documentation of the connections between Judaism and Bolshevism, we shall present several reports from Russia No. 1 this evening.

But first we shall present a booklet on this topic from a source which may be considered quite conventional, except that today if most people in the West heard Christians criticize Jews openly they would be shocked and appalled. We had mentioned a publication called The Catholic Herald several times in The Protocols of Satan, Part 20: The Jewish Peril and the Catholic Church. There we also mentioned other Catholic figures and publications in Britain which were attempting to bring awareness of the ongoing Jewish treachery against Christendom which at that time was effaced by Communism.

In the last segment of this series, titled The Protocols of Satan, Part 35: Inciting Class Warfare, we discussed the enmity between the economic classes which the writers of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion had boasted of planning to incite. Then we discussed several passages from The Communist Manifesto, which is actually a long dissertation expressing that same aspiration, along with the revelation of other plans of the Jews to undermine Western Society, such as the liberation of women from their traditional family roles so that they could be made into objects of sexual gratification available to all bidders, hand in hand with that, and the general destruction of the traditional Western family itself. Here we also have other evidence documenting the advancement of this agenda under the Bolsheviks in Russia.

Finally, as a digression, we offered examples from Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf whereby we hoped to demonstrate that National Socialism was actually antithetical to Marxism, and that National Socialism was absolutely compatible with Christian values, while Marxism was the enemy of Christian values. For example, we demonstrated that National Socialism recognized the inevitable necessities of class distinctions and defended property rights, while Marxism professed an intent to eliminate even the concept of private property. But we also supplied documentation that under the Jewish implementation of Socialism, or Communism, as even Marx had called his profession, in Russia, all property rights were denied to others while Jews had come to hold all of the property. So in reality, Communism was only an avenue by which the Jews sought to realize the professions made in their Talmud, that they should own everything, and hold all other peoples as slaves.

The Right Stuff and the Daily Stormer are Kosher operations and false opposition designed to steer awakening Whites into rabbit holes of futility. Here we have Mike Delaney of Prothink.org to help us discuss why we are convinced that Mike Enoch is a Jew, and why these websites represent dead ends for White Nationalism.

For the entire original recording of the Mike Enoch, Rebel Shoah Musonius Rufus session presented in part here, see Rebel Shoah Fashy Struggle Session January 18th 2017 - Mike Enoch

Christian Identity: What Difference Does it Make?

It is no mistake that 2000 years ago, Christianity spread and was accepted by tribes of White Europeans as they encountered it. It is no mistake that for the last 1500 years Europe has been predominantly Christian. Christianity had spread not only to both Greece and Rome, but also to Britain andp other points in Europe as early as the middle of the first century. Tribes in Gaul were converting to Christianity in the second century. By the third century, if not sooner, Germanic tribes of the Goths and Alans had accepted Christianity. All of this was long before the official acceptance of Christianity began with Constantine the Great, the Edict of Toleration and the Council of Nicaea.

To mock Christianity today is to mock a hundred generations of our ancestors. People who mock Christianity think they know something better about our past than their own ancestors, the people who actually lived in those times many centuries ago. The truth is that the people who mock Christianity know little-to-nothing about the world of the past and the circumstances under which their ancestors ultimately accepted Christianity.

There are many incongruities in the perception of the people who mock Christianity today. On one hand they claim that it is a “cuck” religion, and on the other they complain that their ancestors were forced into Christianity by Christians. So they admit that their own ancestors were weaker than the “cucks” they despise. On one hand they claim that Christianity is an effeminate religion, and a Jewish religion, but then they complain that their ancestors were forced into it by Christians. So they admit that their ancestors were weaker than effeminates and Jews. All the while, they proclaim the “might is right” mantra of their own neo-paganism, while professing that their weak ancestors, forced to subject to Christianity, were somehow treated unfairly! Those who mock Christianity are simply too stupid to realize all of these cognitive disconnects, and there are many more that we won’t get into here. We already presented them here a few years ago, in two podcasts titled White Nationalist Cognitive Dissonance.