Mimicry: The First Step to Destruction

William Finck
CHR20240531-Mimicry_Goebbels.mp3

Mimicry: The First Step to Destruction, a review of and embellishment upon a speech by Joseph Goebbels

The mockingbird is a species of bird which is said to mimic the songs of other birds, and even the sounds of insects and amphibians. But at least mockingbirds nest and raise their own offspring. Yet another species of bird is the cowbird, which is found throughout the western hemisphere, and which lays its eggs in the nests of other species of birds, so that those other species would brood, raise and nourish its offspring. Here is a quandary: if we had to identify races of people with varieties of birds, the Jewish people have consistently exhibited both of these traits, those of the mockingbird and the cowbird, and others which are much more deadly. They mimic Whites so that they can creep into White society, they become entrenched, and then they behave in a manner which destroys their host society, or they themselves are destroyed. But at the same time, they also seek intermarriage with Whites, so they can greatly increase their own corrupt numbers for future generations, and diminish the growth of the true White population. So this evening we are going to present a speech by Joseph Goebbels titled Mimicry, which discusses aspects of this same dilemma, as well as presenting other materials in support of our own conclusions.

This speech is presented here as it is found translated and published by Randall Bytework of Calvin University, who is apparently the creator and maintainer of Calvin’s large German Propaganda Archive. Because of the tenor of the editorial comments at the Archive, we suspect that Mr. Bytework is hostile to our own cause, we have a right to counter his comments with comments of our own, and therefore we must assert that this presentation represents a fair use of his copyrighted material for non-profit academic purposes. That is something to which the copyright laws of these United States entitles their citizens. Doing so, we will add other materials which may elucidate both the text of Goebbels’ speech, the truthfulness of his words, and the result of a situation which he had witnessed as it had continued to develop after his lifetime.

May 2024 Open Forum Discussion

William Finck
CHR20240524-OpenForum.mp3

  • Keith, formerly of Truth Militia, the trial of his wife’s colon cancer diagnosis, and how she has overcome it.
  • Evils of modern industrial farming methods.
  • The immoral state of modern Germany.
  • The folly of worldly leaders and solutions to modern woes.
  • Decadence in the US military.
  • Hollywood influence over public consciousness is never called into question.
  • The Jewish mass murderers and school shooters.
  • Timothy McVeigh, Project Megiddo Report
  • Putting away sinners, race-mixers & Sodomites of one’s own family or children.
  • The evils of vaccines, the Covid vaccines and cancer.
  • Criticizing Comparet for his interpretation of ἄτομος in 1 Corinthians 15:52.
  • Fellowship and denominational churches.
  • Miscellaneous banter.

Help Support Christogenea

William Finck

These past few years, and the past few months especially, Christogenea has been cut off from most of its sources of funding. CashApp has cancelled us. We are currently searching for another new credit card processor as we have already been cancelled by cornerstone.cc, who has been rejecting payments for the past week. Cornerstone has not given us any explanation although we have requested one. We know the explanation already.  

If you appreciate our work, please remember that it is not "free" to produce or to keep freely available. Please help support Christogenea and keep us working!

Aside from 15 separate websites, a chat and 6 radio streams, Christogenea freely hosts over two dozen unrelated Christian Identity or Christian Nationalist websites, and incurs online expenses of over $1200 each month, not including the funding we need to produce our studies and other content.
 

On Genesis, Part 57: The Double Portion

William Finck
Genesis 48:1-22
CHR20240517-Genesis57.mp3

On Genesis, Part 57: The Double Portion

Where we had left off with our commentary at the end of Genesis chapter 47, it had been determined that the sons of Israel would dwell in the land of Goshen, and it was also evident that the famine had, at least for the most part, run its course, so that Joseph was renting the land of Egypt back to the people so long as they paid pharaoh the fifth part of their annual yields. Seeing that, we remarked that a twenty-percent levy was far more equitable than the oppressive taxes which men in a supposedly “free” world are forced to pay to their respective governments today. But home ownership in this “free” world is a separate issue from today’s taxes, and people do not get it from the government. Instead, they acquire their homes from Jewish usurers, and the typical rental or mortgage rates are far higher than a fifth of the median income. Therefore by comparison, Joseph’s management of Egypt actually sounds quite appealing, and so does the medieval feudal system which it resembles.

At the end of that last presentation, we had a lengthy discussion about the wife of Joseph, Asenath, and we were obliged to discredit the assertions made by Howard Rand and others, that she, as well as Joseph’s pharaoh, were of the house of Shem. There is no proof of that assertion, and Rand did not provide any conclusive proofs in the articles where he had made it. Rather, we demonstrated that the evidence which he did offer as proof doesn’t actually support his assertions at all. The reference to a shepherd named Philitis which was made by Herodotus had described him as a common shepherd, and certainly not as a king. The Hyksos which were described differently as either “shepherd kings” or “captive shepherds” in the copies of the writings of Manetho which had been employed by Flavius Josephus were only one and the same group which was described in two different ways in two different copies of the manuscripts of those writings which Josephus had possessed. They were clearly not two different groups, as Rand had insisted, but one group which was associated with the late 15th Dynasty of Egypt, and according to our chronology, Joseph had received Asenath as a wife not long after he was thirty years old, which is at least forty years before that dynasty had taken control of Lower Egypt.

On Genesis, Part 56: Subjects of the State

William Finck
Genesis 47:1-31
CHR20240510-Genesis56.mp3

On Genesis, Part 56: Subjects of the State

In March of 2009, one of the first articles I had published on the Christogenea website, which at that time was only two months old, was titled Who is your god? The article was actually written a year or so before I created the website. In June of 2018, that same article became the basis for Part 39 of my presentation of the Protocols of Satan, which bore the same title. The premise of the article is that America had begun as a Christian nation, but was slowly secularized and descended into humanism. Then, when the trial of the so-called Great Depression had come, Americans looked to the government for their salvation rather than to Christ. So the government, beginning with the so-called New Deal of the Roosevelt administration, was happy to oblige them, instituting many new social programs which had promised to save Americans out of their poverty, and assure their futures. As Americans accepted this new paradigm of government, the government became more and more powerful and more pervasive in the daily lives of the people. However poverty never ended, and instead, in the growth of the federal government which followed, now all Americans are enslaved under increasingly burdensome regulations by the resulting tyranny.

In this same manner we find one more prophetic type in these very chapters of Genesis which we now discuss. We have already mentioned this in brief, but thought that perhaps we should repeat it again here, and elaborate upon it in different ways. So in our last discussion in this Commentary, in relation to Genesis chapter 46 and the account of Israel’s Descent into Egypt, we described the seven kingdoms represented by seven mountains upon which the children of Israel, herself having been represented as a woman, would sit throughout the course of her history, as it is prophesied in Revelation chapter 17. There we further explained how Egypt had been the very first of those kingdoms. Here the children of Israel certainly are sitting upon the mountain of Egypt in that manner, as they have come to Egypt in order to survive the famine, which may be likened to an ancient Great Depression, and they would find their sustenance at the good graces of an earthly kingdom represented by the pharaoh.

America's Christian Beginnings

William Finck
CHR20240503-Christian_America.mp3

America's Christian Beginnings

Here, in light of recent developments and yet another Jewish assault on Christian America, we are going to revisit a sermon preserved in the collection by Bertrand Comparet, but which is actually credited to his wife, Inez Comparet. We have no audio recording of this sermon, and have not been able to locate one. So while I have already discussed the problems with women preaching in churches, and while I have already criticized him for that in the past, I will only make this precursory mention of my disagreement here. Otherwise, the sermon does indeed reflect the fact that Identity Christians have always understood that America, meaning the so-called United States of America, had Christian beginnings and was indeed founded upon Christian principles.

Unfortunately, there are no direct references to Yahshua, or Jesus Christ, in the federal constitution. But there was no necessity for that. Before the so-called Civil War, the United States were always referred to as “these United States”, which is much more appropriate English for describing the collection of individual sovereign States of which the union was originally comprised. But today, the enemies of liberty doubt even this description. So for that, we have often referred to a speech given by John Quincy Adams for the Jubilee of the Constitution, who, when it was given, was a former United States president, and a devoted federalist. If anyone knew the intent of the authors of the U.S. Constitution, it should have been John Quincy Adams, who was kept close to his father throughout his young life, even accompanying him on diplomatic missions to Europe at the young age of ten years (in 1777). His father, John Adams, is of course credited with having been one of the principle authors of the Constitution.