Saxon Messenger Editorials

What is Universalism? This word is very frequently tossed around Christian Identity circles, yet very few students of the Bible, or even pastors, actually take the time to comprehend an accurate definition of its meaning. Those few who do usually resort to a mainstream Christian commentary or theological dictionary, and some often even pick-and-choose from such dictionaries until they find a definition which suits their own purpose. How one may define universalism must even by necessity be relative to the established doctrines of any particular religious sect so there is no certain definition which can fit all sects. So what is universalism to an Identity Christian? We shall endeavor to answer that question shortly. First, to our readers, there is a closely related topic of interest which we must also discuss.

Particularly, we here at the Saxon Messenger, which is a part of the Christogenea ministry, have been labeling a certain so-called Christian Identity pastor (if we must use the term) as a universalist ever since we stopped working with him over two years ago. We parted ways and broke communion with this individual primarily for his universalist positions when interpreting Scripture. Tired of being accused of name-calling, as if somehow we had no substance to such accusations, this past March on a Saturday evening we laid out a large cross-section of the evidence in a single two-and-a-half hour program, supplying many audio clips directly from this person's own recordings and then responding to them from Scripture. We explained why this person deserved the label of universalist with all possible precision. There is a plethora of additional evidence which can be brought to light directly from the written or spoken words of this person which further supports our assertions.

This article is from the open forum podcast Who are the Peacemakers? Christogenea Forum Call 05-30-11

One often-quoted verse from the Sermon on the Mount stands out among those several Bible passages which are frequently abused by universalists. From the Gospel of Matthew, chapter 5, from the King James Version: “9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.”

The pundits of the Judaized denominational sects often cite this passage while concluding that Christians should therefore be at peace with all of the peoples of the world, regardless of nation, sexual orientation, race, religion or creed. Sadly, certain Identity Christians would follow them. But what is a peacemaker? Is an appeaser or a placator of aliens, idolators and sinners really a peacemaker? Is a peacemaker one who “builds bridges”, so to speak, with peoples who are outside of the covenants of God? Is that really what Christ referred to when He gave us these words?Examining the Word of God from the Old Testament, we are given a starkly different picture of what a peacemaker actually is. With all certainty, peacemakers in the Biblical sense are not the world's compromisers, and neither are such peacemakers found to be placators or appeasers. Rather, they are those who would uphold the Word of God, as the author of the Proverbs said: “He that winks with his eyes deceitfully, procures griefs for men; but he that reproves boldly is a peacemaker” (Proverbs 10:10, from the Septuagint).

Black History Month? The manner in which American history is being taught today, one may think that every month of American history has been Black History Month. Wherever one looks, negroes are being foisted upon the public consciousness. Wherever one looks, imagined negro achievements are exalted and trumpeted while actual and tangible White accomplishments and White history are being diminished and ridiculed, and even criminalized.

For instance, walking through the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, there is nothing at all of any real substance on display about the American Constitution itself. And you certainly will not find the actual text of the Constitution. Rather, there is talk about negro slavery, freedom, and civil rights at every turn. The only other topic treated at length is woman's suffrage, wherever the Center has exhibitions for the period following the Civil War. The entire purpose of the National Constitution Center seems to be the exaltation of negroes in American society, and secondarily the exaltation of women, all while White culture is denigrated and White men are marked off as hypocrites. Absolutely forgotten is the inconvenient truth, that the American Constitution was a document created by and for White men, and for those White people whom the men that created it were representing. Explicitly stated in its preamble is the declaration that it was written to “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”, which means the descendants of those very same White people. It was never the plan of the founders of this nation to include anyone but Whites in its polity. Negroes were never intended to be considered as equals, as citizens, or as the recipients of this great White heritage. In taking them into the fold, so to speak, Whites have spit in the face of their ancestors, who actually had cared about them as their posterity that they left them a document whereby they could preserve their freedom and their independence - if only they'd have actually read that document.