Weiland Letter 2005

A Christogenea commentary On the Gospel of John has recently been completed. Many passages simply do not say what the modern churches think they mean! Don't miss this important and ground-breaking work proving that Christian Identity is indeed fully supported by Scripture.

A Commentary on Genesis is now being presented. Here we endeavor to explain the very first book of the Christian Bible from a perspective which reconciles both the Old and New Testaments with archaeology and ancient history, through eyes which have been opened by the Gospel of Christ.

A Commentary on the Epistles of Paul has been completed at Christogenea.org. This lengthy and in-depth series reveals the true Paul as an apostle of God, a prophet in his own right, and the first teacher of what we call Christian Identity.

Don't miss our recently-completed series of commentaries on the Minor Prophets of the Bible, which has also been used as a vehicle to prove the historicity of the Bible as well as the Provenance of God.

Visit Clifton Emahiser's Watchman's Teaching Ministries at Christogenea.org for his many foundational Christian Identity studies.

Christogenea Books: Christian Truths in Black and White!
Visit our store at Christogenea.com.

WILLIAM FINCK VERSUS
TED R. WEILAND

By: William Finck

The following is a reproduction of a hand written letter I sent to Ted R. Weiland, P.O. Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska, 69363, dated 19th August 2005 in support of Tony Gonyer whose address will not be cited here. Tony had taken exception to some of Weiland’s audio recordings, where Weiland insists upon sharing Yahweh’s promises to Israel with Yahweh’s enemies. It is now mid-November, and Weiland has not yet responded to my letter:

Sir (meaning Ted R. Weiland), I have recently had the pleasure of reading an exchange of letters between yourself and one Tony Gonyer, which consisted of letters from you dated July 14th and August 5th of 2005, and one from Tony to you dated July 29th 2005. While I have never met nor corresponded with Tony, we have a common associate in Mr. Clifton Emahiser.

Now Mr. Weiland, I have never before corresponded with you, but having been involved with Israel Identity for eight years now, I am quite familiar with your teachings and take this opportunity to express my feelings to you.

First I must say, that you may wax philosophical, creating hair-splitting differences between the definitions of “racialism” and “racism”, and that may get you by in 87% white, 4% black Nebraska, but it certainly would not where I grew up in northeastern New Jersey, or where I am now in federal prison. The non-whites see no difference between the two, and neither will they. From their perspective, they see both as the same form of hatred: a non-acceptance of them as full equals in a borderless world. Your distinctions between the two words are, in effect, vanity. You are deceiving yourself.

Mr. Weiland, you profess that you would give Bibles to non-whites. Yet Paul says at 1 Corinthians 1:18 that “the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness.” There is no promise anywhere of resurrection or eternal life to the other races, Mr. Weiland, and they have not the Spirit of Yahweh which makes that possible (Rom. 8:11) in the first place! The promise of salvation, or preservation, in the Bible is only to Israel, evident in both Old Testament and New. So why should you be foolish, to teach other races the Bible?

Proof of the validity of the position is manifest in many places, but especially at Matthew 25:31-46, where it is explained that Yahshua shall separate all nations (ἒθνος, nation, ethnicity) from each other, as a shepherd divides sheep from goats. Only Israel are identified in the Bible as being “sheep”, in the New Testament as well as Old (Jer. 50, Ezek. 34) and that leaves only one other category in which to place all other nations (races): goats! Now while the parable says that the sheep go on to eternal life, “us which are saved” in 1 Cor. 1:18, the goats go on to eternal punishment, “them that perish” in 1 Cor. 1:18, and so Paul would label you as a fool for preaching to them! Is this not clearly evident in these and other Scriptures, such as Matthew 7:6?

Now you may scoff at me for what I am about to say, but I would challenge you to prove otherwise: Nowhere in the Bible can you point to and establish as fact that Yahweh created the non-white races. Rather, a study of pre-history and their own myths reveals that the non-white races are but a corruption of the original creation, along with the “fallen angels” of Rev. 12:7-9, and all being mixed are themselves by fact of their existence a violation of Yahweh’s laws of kind after kind. All of the ante-diluvian Adamites and all of the Adamic Genesis 10 nations were originally white: a fact which can certainly be established. All of the Genesis 10 nations (except Israel and some other Adamites among us) were destroyed by mixing with the alien races, voluntarily or not, and so their remnants are no longer white today. Jeremiah 31:27-30 forebodes this same thing, a mixing of the races (Adam and beast), which our Israel race suffers everywhere at this very moment. All who accept it shall die, and such is the Word of Yahweh! Yet we are promised that a remnant shall always survive.

Israel was told to make no covenants or agreements with the other races, i.e. Isaiah 8:9-15, Ex. 34:12, Deut. 7:2, Jdgs. 2:2. You would teach them Scripture, something unheard of anywhere in the Bible! Yahweh is not their God, for Christ has no concord with Belial! Only Israel were prophesied to be His people and to obey and serve Him, Old Testament and New. Your teachings, Mr. Weiland, contradict the Word of Yahweh in many places. I strongly urge you to reconsider them.

The parable of the sheep and goats mentioned above, the parables of the marriage feast (Matt. 22:1-14), the net (Matt. 13:47-50), the mustard seed (Matt. 13:31-32), the wheat and tares (i.e. Matt. 13:37-42) and others all have a clear racial message, often more evident among those who examine the Greek. These messages were spoken in parables for good reason: that the Edomites and other non-Israel races would not understand them! So why are you attempting to circumvent the Word?

Not without reason is it written in Ecclesiasticus (Σοφια Σειραχ) 12:5-6: “Do well unto him that is lowly, but give not to the ungodly: hold back thy bread, and give it not unto him, lest he overmaster thee thereby: for else thou shalt receive twice as much evil for all the good thou shalt have done unto him. For the Most High hateth sinners, and will repay vengeance unto the ungodly, and keepeth them against the mighty day of their punishment.”

By sharing the “bread of life”, the Word of Yahweh, with the other races, they overmaster us by it. They force universalist interpretations through phrases such as “whosoever” and “all men”, phrases never meant for other races, deceiving the sheep into unlawful communion and fornication, which is race mixing (Jude 7, 1 Cor. 10). In reality, the word “man” should only be applied to sons of Adam (Romans 5:14, 1 Cor. 15:22-45, Σοφια Σειραχ 40:1), and the other races have no part in the Biblical use of the term “Adam”!

Crumbs, Mr. Weiland, fall to the floor unintentionally. Crumbs are not purposefully distributed upon request. You purposefully throw that which is holy to dogs, and cast pearls before swine, every time you willingly share the Word with a non-Adamite. Pontificate on this if you must, or call it what you will, but remember that Paul calls it foolishness. Did Yahweh tell Joshua’s Israel to preach the law to the Canaanites and send them over the border? No! He told Israel to kill them all! Yet Israel failed and fell from His grace for it. It is hearts like yours, Mr. Weiland, which would placate the other races, which have caused Israel to fail. You seek their peace. Yahweh says that there is no peace for them! (Deut. 23:6; Psa. 28:3; Isa. 33:7-8, 57:21, Jer. 6:14, 8:8-15, 9:8; 1 Thes. 5:3; Matt. 10:34; Luke 12:49-51). Christ Himself would not placate nor seek the peace of the other races. Your teachings, Mr. Weiland, are not Biblical. You should instead follow His example and tell them “Depart from me, ye cursed!” (Matt. 25:41).

I suggest that you heed Tony Gonyer, and study Clifton Emahiser, for his doctrines are far more accurate and true to Scripture than your own. It is not Clifton who is hateful. Rather, those who reject the Word of Yahweh and choose instead to embrace His enemies are those who are hateful! David was a man after Yahweh’s own heart, and hated Yahweh’s enemies with a perfect hatred! Yahshua said not in vain: “Blessed are you when men hate you and when they separate from you and they reproach and they cast out your name as evil because of the Son of Man: Rejoice in that day and leap, for behold your reward is great in heaven!” (From Luke 6:22-23, my reading of the NA27 text), and “Woe when all men speak well to you, for in accordance with these same things did their fathers do to the false prophets!” (Luke 6:26, ibid.) Mr. Weiland I exhort you, study the Scripture again and consider these things. For you teach not the Word of Yahweh, but the words of weak and incompetent men, sharing the Word with all sorts of beasts and ungodly creatures.

Mr. Weiland, if I am wrong, I challenge you and I exhort you to exhibit why I am in error. Do not be as Dave Barley, Dan Gentry, and Stephen Jones – all of whom have left unanswered my letters to them over the past two years. I am not as you intone, a “disgruntled, hateful, mean-spirited, false accusing ... ineffective ... nincompoop.” False accusations surely are a serious matter with Yahweh! And neither does Clifton Emahiser meet the description with which you label him.

I thought to say much more here, but what I have said should be sufficient to illustrate my purpose. I would like your answer concerning Matt. 25:31-46 and 1 Cor. 1:18 especially. Enclosed you will find a copy of a pamphlet I wrote recently, entitled Baptism: In What? Can you find fault in that? I will send copies of this letter to Tony Gonyer, and to Clifton Emahiser. I hope that you choose to continue this discourse.  Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit WRF  ... P.S. From the American Heritage College Dictionary, third edition: “ra-cial-ism ... noun Chiefly British. Variation of racism.” See? No difference! WRF (end)

Thank you William Finck. I (Clifton) will now repeat excerpts from Weiland’s two audio recordings; the first made sometime during the year 2002:

“... but that doesn’t mean that a non-Israelite cannot join himself to Yahweh, and partake – and why wouldn’t we want them to? Why wouldn’t we want the nations around to be serving our God?, and under His Laws? – so we could have commerce with those nations .... not only for my race but for their race as well ... I have come to appreciate the other races and their individuality more since understanding this [Identity] message than before I understood it. God created everything to be good ... have you ever noticed the media always say we call the other races ‘mud people’? I have never in my life ever heard the term except in the media. Not amongst the people I preach to ... so why wouldn’t we want to embrace others into this message? ... If anything, we should be absolutely ashamed of ourselves because of our past reputation and our past history as a people and what we have squandered because of who we are. We should be ashamed of ourselves and our forefathers more than the rest of the races. They are wallowing in their sin because of our sin. Let’s just face it ...”

Then again, Ted R. Weiland on an audio CD labeled “Mission to Israel”; entitled You Might Be A Christian if... Pt. 9, (CD 656), and the address given: P.O. Box. 248. Scottsbluff, NE 69363, made midsummer 2005:

“... And don’t you dare, and I don’t think anyone would here – I’m sure you wouldn’t, but somebody who might hear this on tape – don’t you dare interpret what I just said as racist and supremacist, because I assure you that one can be a separatist without being a racist ... without being racist or supremacist. How do I know that? Because I’m a separatist, and I denounce racists and supremacists. And if you don’t want to believe me on that, then you might want to possibly take the word of hundreds – and who knows how many more – maybe more than that, you might want to take the word of hundreds of black Nigerians and others to whom this ministry has sent hundreds, if not thousands of dollars of free Bibles and tapes since its very inception. I’m not a separatist because I hate other races. I’m a separatist because I love Yahweh and His laws which require – which require that His people live separate segregated lives .... Now once again there are going to be all kinds of objections. Someone is surely to counter that this passage is addressing religious, not racial separation, to which I respond – not that there are some exceptions – that people can’t from other races, and have in the past, joined themselves to Yahweh and embraced the Covenant ...”