Challenging Orthodoxy: Scriptural Witnesses Against the Trinity Doctrine

Challenging Orthodoxy: Scriptural Witnesses Against the Trinity Doctrine

Before I begin, I must repeat something I have stated very frequently over the past few decades, which is that no part of Scripture is a lie. One verse of Scripture does not disprove another verse. If there is a perceived conflict, sometimes it is a corrupt text, which, on occasion, can be rectified by examining ancient manuscripts. Sometimes it is merely a poor translation which is more easily corrected upon examining the original languages. Sometimes it is a poor understanding of the context in which . But much more frequently than any of these, is a poor understanding on the part of the reader, and a lack of knowledge which is rectified only through further study. Therefore all of the “gotcha” verses which a scoffer may pull out of his pocket to refute our claims here this evening, do not prove what the scoffers think they prove.

Yes, Christ, the man, often prayed to God the Father, and often spoke of God the Father, from the perspective of a man. But that which He had done, He did as an example to men. When He washed the feet of His disciples, He said, as it is recorded in John chapter 13: “15 For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you.” Then, in 1 Peter chapter 1 we read: “21 For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps: 22 Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth: 23 Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously”, so that likewise, we would strive to live as He had lived, without sin and committing ourselves to His judgment. For that reason, to serve as an example for men, during His earthly ministry He behaved just as a man should behave, and not as God. After His resurrection, he was recognized as God. Yahshua Christ did not become a god, but rather, He is God who became a man, and His Resurrection proved that He is God. When the apostle Thomas had realized that it was Christ who was resurrected from the dead, he responded by declaring “My Lord and my God!” The prophet Isaiah was read in the synagogues, Christ Himself read from Isaiah and declared one Messianic prophecy to have been fulfilled in Himself, so men knew the other prophecies concerning their promised Redeemer, and they understood that those prophecies were fulfilled in Christ.

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 48: The Furnace of Affliction

Isaiah 48:1-22

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 48: The Furnace of Affliction

Discussing the Visions of Babylon in our last presentation in Isaiah we had made several assertions concerning the interpretation of prophecy. The Bible offers us very little direct instruction in this area, outside of the examples which are found in the interpretations of the prophets in the words of Christ and the writings of His apostles. Therefore, I can only offer my own opinion, and attempt to explain my own methods. But as I have also tried to warn, attempts to determine the course of future events from prophecies of events which may or may not have already been fulfilled in the past is in itself a form of idolatry, especially if they are used to develop concrete expectations, which, in turn, may even become points of doctrine. That is because men having such expectations may plan and build their lives around them, and if the expected events do not come to pass, or at least, if they do not happen as expected, then those men have labored in vain. We should not want to cause any of our brethren to labor in vain, even if vanity is ultimately inevitable, to one degree or another and in one aspect of life or another.

However the truth of the assertion that there are prophecies in scripture which have more than one fulfillment is indeed demonstrable in may ways even if, lacking a full knowledge of history, we may not be able to determine every one of the precise details by which certain prophecies have already been fulfilled. So while there are always some things to which we may remain blind, because our knowledge of the remote past is not perfect or complete, there are also other things that we may see clearly with what knowledge which we do have of the past, and know how certain prophecies had been fulfilled.

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 47: Visions of Babylon

Isaiah 47:1-15

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 47: Visions of Babylon

In our last presentation in Isaiah, we had explained that from the message of comfort for Jerusalem which is found in chapter 40, the overall context in the remaining chapters of Isaiah is a series of prophecies concerning the fate of the children of Israel in captivity, as well as the means of their reconciliation in the promises of a coming Savior and Redeemer of Israel, or, to use a word which Isaiah had not used in that context, the coming Messiah. However a more immediate context here in these chapters of Isaiah, from chapter 44, is the prophecy of Cyrus, the then-future Persian king who conquered Babylon about a hundred and sixty years after Isaiah had written these chapters.

Here Babylon has not been mentioned since Isaiah chapter 43, where the Word of Yahweh had stated that “14 Thus saith the LORD, your redeemer, the Holy One of Israel; For your sake I have sent to Babylon, and have brought down all their nobles, and the Chaldeans, whose cry is in the ships.” There we asserted that those words have more significance as a far-vision prophecy, comparing language concerning shipping and merchants in the prophecy of the fall of Mystery Babylon in Revelation chapter 18. But of course, there is also a near-vision fulfillment, although that could not have been fulfilled until some time in Isaiah’s future, since Babylon was not a threat to the kingdom of Judah in Isaiah’s lifetime. The act of the Babylonians having sent an embassy to Jerusalem to meet with Hezekiah is indicative of Babylonian intentions to break from the Assyrian empire, which is also evident in other historical records, however that did not occur for at least another seventy years.

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 46: The Failure of Idols

Isaiah 46:1-13

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 46: The Failure of Idols

We might understand the attitudes and the poor understanding of judaized Christians who have been imbued with the lies of the Church and all of the denominations it has spawned over these last 1800 years. However there is nothing more disappointing than to see Identity Christians reject the notion that all Israel shall be saved, in spite of their sins. However this is much more than a mere notion: It is an explicit promise which is expressed in various ways in many passages of Scripture, and especially in the words of the prophets. So here in Isaiah chapter 45, there are two unequivocal promises of universal salvation for the children of Israel, which are first evidenced in the words: “17 But Israel shall be saved in the LORD with an everlasting salvation: ye shall not be ashamed nor confounded world without end.” Then in the final verse of the chapter we read: “25 In the LORD shall all the seed of Israel be justified, and shall glory.” Only a rebellious soul could twist these words into something other than what they plainly mean.

However in the development of Roman Catholicism, there were many such rebellious souls even when they did not mean to be rebellious. Over the centuries, doctrines had been contrived of heaven and hell and purgatory which are not founded in the Scriptures, and they have been used to control people as well as for men to profit from them. The priesthood set themselves up as idols, proclaiming that their baptism and their rituals alone can save men and grant them an entry to heaven. Essentially, they claim that their authority must rule over men, for men to continue in the salvation which they purport to bestow upon them with their rituals. Then in order to help maintain their pretense of authority, they offer actual idols, representations of the creation found in so-called “saints”, unto which men prostrate themselves and pray for mercy or forgiveness, as if God Himself cannot hear our unworthy voices, and we need some plaster statue intercessor, artificial representations of men or women who could not even save themselves.

William Finck with JermWarfare on UKColumn: The biblical history of the Jews

For various reasons, I really needed to take a break this week, with no offense to Isaiah – and I hope to continue the Isaiah commentary next Friday. So this evening I will present my most recent Jerm Warfare discussion. This podcast was pre-recorded on August 26th, 2025, and the video was published by Jerm at the UKColumn website on September 4th. By agreement, UKColumn discourages their hosts from sharing their data, so out of courtesy I have waited a month to share it here, and would have waited longer if I had not needed the time this week.

This particular podcast probably could have been better. We spent 12 days on the road, then I had a Friday evening Open Forum the day after we got home, and in the meantime my little brother rolled into the swamp for a three-day visit so I couldn’t get a break, but for which at the same time I certainly cannot complain. We spent more time than we had together in 40 years, for which I am extremely grateful. Then Tuesday morning I was up at 6AM Central time so that I could wake up and get enough coffee into me for this promised 8AM recording. I am not really much of a morning person, and this particular morning I was still quite tired.

Download the video.