Modern History

America's Christian Beginnings

Here, in light of recent developments and yet another Jewish assault on Christian America, we are going to revisit a sermon preserved in the collection by Bertrand Comparet, but which is actually credited to his wife, Inez Comparet. We have no audio recording of this sermon, and have not been able to locate one. So while I have already discussed the problems with women preaching in churches, and while I have already criticized him for that in the past, I will only make this precursory mention of my disagreement here. Otherwise, the sermon does indeed reflect the fact that Identity Christians have always understood that America, meaning the so-called United States of America, had Christian beginnings and was indeed founded upon Christian principles.

Unfortunately, there are no direct references to Yahshua, or Jesus Christ, in the federal constitution. But there was no necessity for that. Before the so-called Civil War, the United States were always referred to as “these United States”, which is much more appropriate English for describing the collection of individual sovereign States of which the union was originally comprised. But today, the enemies of liberty doubt even this description. So for that, we have often referred to a speech given by John Quincy Adams for the Jubilee of the Constitution, who, when it was given, was a former United States president, and a devoted federalist. If anyone knew the intent of the authors of the U.S. Constitution, it should have been John Quincy Adams, who was kept close to his father throughout his young life, even accompanying him on diplomatic missions to Europe at the young age of ten years (in 1777). His father, John Adams, is of course credited with having been one of the principle authors of the Constitution.

Hitler, Christian, Part 2

Our intention here is to demonstrate conclusively, that Adolf Hitler was a Christian, and not merely in word but in substance, and that is the sort of Christianity that the world simply does not understand. If National Socialism was founded on the principle of a sacrifice of one's self-interest for the benefit of one's own people, or community, and with programs for the protection and care for the elderly, women, and children, and with the same moral values that are outlined in Christian Scriptures, and with concern for the property rights of all classes beginning with the poorest and humblest rather than only for the wealthy and strong, and with concern for the racial purity of the people as the Christian scriptures certainly forbid any mixing of the races, then National Socialism is Christian, since none of these ideals are openly espoused in the literature of pagans, atheists, or Jews.

Furthermore, if Adolf Hitler consistently referred to the Christian Scriptures in order to defend and illustrate his positions on race and people, even in spite of the fact that the churches themselves ignore those Scriptures, or obscure and pervert them with fairy tales, then Adolf Hitler was indeed a Christian, and he was a better Christian than the officials of those churches. That is what he did; that is what National Socialism later put into its party platform and enacted into its laws; therefore what he did and said in relation to blood and race, using the allegories and illustrations which are found in the Christian scriptures, must have also been sincere. Such allegories and examples, such moral ethics and laws, cannot be found in the literature of pagans or atheists, and they are only perverted by Jews.

Hitler, Christian, Part 1

Here I am going to explain why Adolf Hitler was a Christian, and why National Socialism was essentially a Christian political philosophy in spite of the protests heard from church-going mainstream Christians and non-Christians alike, and especially from pagans who somehow insist that Hitler was one of them. Recently having presented conversations here with both Dennis Wise and Rosette Delacroix, and it being in the week of Hitler’s birthday, this was a subject of both discussions. Now this is the third day since the anniversary of Hitler’s death, and while we certainly do not expect him to be resurrected already, it is evident that the entire world will not let his memory rest until the battle which he fought is finally won, as it certainly is not over. That battle can only be won by Yahshua Christ, by God Himself.

I am not going to claim that Hitler or National Socialism were perfect, as no political philosophy is perfect outside of the Kingdom of God which all Christians should anticipate, where only Christ rules over us all. Neither am I attempting to worship Adolf Hitler, as certain of my detractors have sometimes claimed, and even the thought of that is repulsive to me. Rather, I only seek to correct the historical record, and refute the idea that Hitler and National Socialist Germany were somehow pagan, or even atheistic.

Since the Second World War, in a process which actually began many decades or even centuries earlier, most Europeans have become completely alienated from the churches, while the Christian churches in America have been completely co-opted as tools to be used by Jewish interests and a truly anti-Christian fervor for Zionism. During that same period, the basic principles of Christianity have been nullified by the secularization of society and the ever-growing effects of pop-culture and materialism, accompanied by the ever-increasing acceptance of so-called “alternative lifestyles”, the advent of a new and world-wide Sodom and Gomorrah.

Comments I made during this podcast relating to John F. Kennedy and the Federal Reserve are now posted in the Christogenea Forum.

For a reading list on the assassination, and for other materials, see more here below. What follows are my opening remarks:

One facet of recent American history which I have not touched in any of my studies are the Kennedy assassinations. Perhaps that is because such a great amount of revisionist work – both good and bad – had already been done in that field even before I could get a chance to study it. But admittedly, I have not even taken the time to study which revisionist work offers the soundest treatment of the matter. The Michael Collins Piper book, Final Judgement, is often applauded, and I think it certainly blames the right culprits for the assassination, but I have not even read that. Looking at the field of available work, there seems to be a flood of conflicting theories floating around revisionist circles, and perhaps the subject is best left to someone who can specialize in this one area.

The Night of the Long Knives, Part 3

Here we continue and conclude our series of articles from The Barnes Review describing the event which is known as The Night of the Long Knives. When we began to present this series, we actually ordered and have just received a copy of the book from which these articles were taken, which is Hitler, Democrat, by former Waffen SS General Leon Degrelle. The six articles we are presenting in this series were actually taken from chapters 38 through 43 of that book, and they were reprinted in Barnes Review issues through September-October, 2002. As we have already discussed, Degrelle was a Belgian journalist, politician and founder of the Rexist Party, and then later a National Socialist and Waffen SS volunteer who during the War had worked his way up the ranks from Private to Colonel. Then he was evidently promoted to General as the war came to its unfortunate end. Last week we presented articles titled The Röhm Crisis Worsens and Last Millimeters of the Fuse, which continued to describe the events leading up to the famous National Socialist purge, and which fully described its necessity, for the alternative was to send Germany down another path to civil war. This week, we shall present the next articles in the series, The Bloody End of Ernst Röhm: The Night of the Long Knives and then 38 Million Germans Make Their Voices Heard: A Landslide Victory for Adolf Hitler, which gives us an impression of how well the German people had thought of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists only weeks after the purge.

Leon Degrelle describes Ernst Röhm’s political and economic philosophy in a manner that impels us to label him as a Marxist. It is our understanding that Adolf Hitler was absolutely ambivalent towards Marxism, and that his own political and economic philosophy, as they are described in Mein Kampf, were grounded in Christian principles and absolutely antithetical to Marxism. Furthermore, Adolf Hitler’s revolution was political, and ended as soon as the National Socialist German Worker’s Party came to power in 1933. But for Ernst Röhm, the revolution had only begun and needed to continue, ostensibly until he could fulfill his own desires to bring his own form of Bolshevism to Germany. But the trouble between the two men erupted over Röhm’s promotion of the Sturmabteilung, or SA, the party’s paramilitary organization, as a replacement for the German Wehrmacht – the regular army which Röhm sought to dismantle. It is obvious to us, and evidently became obvious to Hitler, that Röhm wanted the SA to replace the Wehrmacht so that he as its commander could supplant the NSDAP leadership and execute his continued revolution.

2

The Barnes Review had for several years run chapters or portions of chapters from the books of Leon Degrelle as articles in its bi-monthly publication. As we have already discussed, Degrelle was a Belgian journalist, politician and founder of the Rexist Party, and then later a National Socialist and Waffen SS volunteer who during the War had worked his way up the ranks from Private to Colonel. Then in the last days of combat, he had apparently attained a rank of General, if indeed the promotion was legitimate. But we shall continue to call him a General. Last week we presented two such articles from Degrelle, The Civil War Within the German National Socialist Party and Röhm Continues to Push. This week we shall present the next two articles in the series, which are The Röhm Crisis Worsens and Last Millimeters of the Fuse.

As we saw last week, Ernst Röhm was an outspoken proponent of two ideas that were completely contrary to Adolf Hitler. First, he was a Marxist. However in the capacity in which he served the party, his economic philosophy was secondary to his work. More importantly, he strongly advocated the autonomy of the SA (the Sturmabteilung or Storm Detachment of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, which was commonly called the Brownshirts) from the party itself, and once the NSDAP came to power he insisted upon the complete replacement of the Wehrmacht, the regular German army, with the SA. As we have seen Degrelle explain, the SA was designed as a paramilitary organization of men who were not formally trained as military officers and soldiers, but who were basically street-fighters, mixed with a number of thugs, and mostly patriotic defenders of the Party’s right to express itself and to hold meetings and rallies. The SA was formed out of necessity, as the violent communist thugs – Germany’s early Antifa – always sought to infiltrate and disrupt the events held by rival parties, and especially those of the political Right.

The Night of the Long Knives, Part 1

Here I am going to present a series of articles by General Leon Degrelle which explain the strife within the National Socialist German Workers Party which culminated in the infamous Night of the Long Knives, which was a purge of prominent dissidents and loose cannons within the Party which took place from June 30th to July 2nd, 1934. There is a lot of extant misinformation and propaganda concerning this purge, because there are few take the time to understand what events had led to it, and what events transpired in its aftermath. Only weeks after the purge was completed, Hitler’s leadership of both the Party and of Germany was confirmed in a landslide election victory, on August 19th of 1934.

After the death of Paul von Hindenburg on August 2nd, a referendum was held to merge the offices of Chancellor and President, making Adolf Hitler the undisputed leader of Germany. In order to judge the scope of the victory and the perception of Hitler by the German public at this time, we should take a brief look at the German federal elections which were held just prior to 1934. In 1925, Hindenburg won the office of President with less than 49% of the vote, and in again in 1932 with 53%. That same year, opponent Adolf Hitler received nearly 37% of the vote. Hitler was soon appointed Chancellor, which was the second position in the government, by an aged and ailing von Hindenburg. He had only run for reelection in fear of a National Socialist victory, to keep Hitler out of the office of President.

Once Hitler became Chancellor, he called for new elections which were held in March of 1933, where he had hoped to gain a sound majority. He was again victorious but received only about 44% of the vote, so any legislation he sought would still require the assistance of a coalition of parties in order to succeed. Hitler remained Chancellor and Hindenburg remained as President until his death. Then on August 19th of 1934, barely seven weeks after the purge of several major figures within his own Party, Hitler finally prevailed as the vacant office of President was merged with the office of Chancellor with nearly 89% of the vote. In this election, Hitler had no actual opponent. Either the offices would be merged and Hitler would assume the new office, or the people would reject the merger, and that would have necessitated a new election for President. So while it was not truly a direct election, the people nevertheless gave Adolf Hitler a sound vote of confidence only a short time after the Night of the Long Knives.

Christogenea Saturdays, March 5th 2016: Goebbels' Hope from a Christian Identity Perspective

Last night we made a presentation titled The Kingdom of Heaven, or the Elections of Men? First, we must apologize for the bandwidth problems which we experienced, which were unforeseen and beyond our control. We pray that we do not have that problem this evening. In our last presentation here, a week ago, we discussed Hitler's War from a Christian Identity perspective. This presentation will continue some of the themes discussed in both of those prior programs.

Presenting Hitler's War from a Christian Identity Perspective, we saw that Adolf Hitler had correctly identified the war he was waging as a war for blood and race, and that the Jews wanted to destroy German racial integrity as well as desiring to control Germany and all the world economically. Hitler also correctly saw Bolshevism as a partner of Capitalism in the Jewish plan for world domination. So from a Christian Identity perspective, we must recognize that Hitler's war is also our war, and that it is still being fought even though the battle is not by the same means.

Christogenea Saturdays, February 27th, 2016: Hitler’s War from a Christian Identity Perspective

Lately we have been discussing Christian Identity vision and objectives in presentations with Mark Downey and again in a recent article posted at Christogenea, which summarized some of the things we said in those presentations. Here we are going to offer what may at first seem to be a strange mix, especially to those who have not heard us speak about Adolf Hitler and National Socialism. This subject we have not touched on now for many months. What might seem to some to be a strange mix has a definite purpose. I would implore you not to accept the Anglo-American-Jewish propaganda concerning 20th century history. It absolutely amazes me that so many fools who claim to be Identity Christians, and especially pastors, still do accept all of those Jewish lies. Tonight I want to summarize, at least in part, what has happened in Europe and throughout the West in recent history, what is happening now as a result of that history, and also offer a summary of the proper perspective which the Identity Christians should have of both the events of recent history, and most importantly, of the place which we must assume for ourselves within the context of that history. All the Jews stand for lies, and we must stand for truth.

To help us accomplish this objective, we are going to present our recent article. But first, we we are going to present what is commonly known as Adolf Hitler’s last speech. It was a radio address to the German Volk made on January 30th, 1945. While it is short, we are going to read all of it, because it describes an earlier stage in the very same battle that our White race faces once again today. Except that comparatively, Whites as a collective people today are more like the Germans of 1922 than they are of 1933 or 1945. The speech is addressed to the German Volksgenossen, which are national comrades, and National Socialists, and ostensibly both labels were used to refer to the same people. 

Tonight we are going to discuss what has come to be called the Holodomor, a word which refers to the Terror Famine in the Ukraine and the genocide against Ukrainians and Germans in Ukraine which was conducted by the Bolsheviks over 12 years in the 1920's and 30's. While this topic is becoming discussed more and more in certain circles, it has not yet managed to pervade the public consciousness, which is a testament of the degree Jewish control over the media where their own claims concerning a holocaust are fervently repeated each and every day. So we do this with the purpose of lending our voice to the ever-growing choir. For this discussion, we are going to use as our primary source an article which ran in the Barnes Review in July of 1996. We will, however, include other materials and we also have plenty of our own comments.

We have only a couple of small disclaimers, however, and that is that the author seems to concede a Jewish holocaust perpetrated by Germany, however that is not truly the case. Also, he offers some quotes from some Jewish sources, as if that gives legitimacy to his assertions. That is fine, but we hope that White Europeans realize that we do not need Jews to learn about Jewish treachery. It seems that self-hating Jews are all too popular in certain White Nationalist circles, and it leads to the mistaken belief that there may actually be some good devils, which is certainly not the case.

The Other Holocaust— The Terror Famine In Ukraine

by Peter J. Lorden

[This article was first published in the July, 1996 edition of The Barnes Review.]

People talk about “the holocaust” as if there had been only one this century, and that one unique in human history. But what of the one inflicted by Josef “Stalin” Djugashvili on Ukraine?

Although Ukraine’s holocaust by famine resulted in the deaths of many more people than were ever attributed to Adolf Hitler in the “official” holocaust, and although it happened only a few years earlier, few now living have any perception of it. That’s understandable, as only one “holocaust” is taught in our schools and constantly featured in the media.

Could this be because those media are heavily influenced by people who have much to gain by promoting one while drawing a blackout curtain across the other? Is it merely by accident that obsessive promotion of the one would be diminished by extensive disclosure of the horrors and dimensions of the other?

Sword Brethren and the Kaiser fill in for William Finck with a discussion concerning the various steps which Adolf Hitler had to take in order to effectively defend Germany from those who would destroy it.

The notes and reference materials used for this presentation have now been posted at the Christogenea.org Mein Kampf Project here:

Justifying the National Socialist Reaction to the Reichstag Fire, Part 2 - The Inevitability of the Enabling Act

The notes and reference materials used for this presentation have now been posted at the Christogenea.org Mein Kampf Project here:

Justifying the National Socialist Reaction to the Reichstag Fire, Part 1 - Threat of Communist Revolution in Germany, 1929-1933

The article presented for this program is found at the Christogenea Mein Kampf Project:

The 1933 International Jewish Boycott of Germany

Articles employed in the making of this presentation are accessible at the Christogenea.org Mein Kampf Project:

Who Set the Reichstag Fire?

William Finck and Sword Brethren present and discuss two speeches by Joseph Goebbels, Our Hitler (1933) and The New Year (1934). The example which Hitler made, which Goebbels illustrated, and some of the things which Identity Christians should learn from them and from National Socialist history in general.

For the text of Wilhelm Bauer's booklet with the passages from Mein Kampf along with some of the other references and notes used in this podcast series, see the Christogenea Mein Kampf Project website here: National Socialist German Economic Policy

This program was based upon the article What Does America Really Want? by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, which can be found with a short introduction and a translation of the text at the German Propaganda Archive at Calvin University.