A critical review of the sermon Let's Examine the Evidence, by Bertrand Comparet

Christogenea is reader supported. If you find value in our work, please help to keep it going! See our Contact Page for more information or DONATE HERE!

  • Christogenea Internet Radio
CHR20160408-LetsExamineEvidence.mp3 — Downloaded 5994 times

Bertrand ComparetA Critical Review of Let’s Examine the Evidence, by Bertrand Comparet

This evening we are going to present a sermon by Bertrand Comparet titled Let’s Examine the Evidence. The purpose of the sermon is to prove through an assessment of certain of the parables of Yahshua Christ that the New Testament is consistent and contiguous with the Word of God in the Old Testament, and therefore that all of the promises of the Old still stand for the children of Israel under the New.

We are going to offer several of our own comments both supporting Comparet’s work, and sometimes criticizing and seeking to correct his work. As we have often said concerning Bertrand Comparet and other Christian Identity teachers of the past, we owe them a debt of gratitude for the wonderful work and excellent research which they did, blazing a trail for us in our quest for Biblical truth. But we also owe it to them and to ourselves to correct any errors they made along the way, and to further edify the work which they left us. We would be honored if in the future, others did that same thing with our own work.

If our text here varies slightly from what is posted at the Bertrand Comparet archive at Christogenea, it is only because we amended parts of Clifton’s original publication from a taped presentation made by Comparet himself, and then we realized that two different taped presentations of Comparet’s sermon exist in our archives, so the slight differences were probably made by Comparet himself.

It must also be mentioned, that Comparet used the terms God, Lord and Jesus, where our version has Yahweh and Yahshua, after the manner in which both Clifton and Jeanne Snyder before him had transcribed Comparet’s sermons.

Let's Examine the Evidence by Bertrand L. Comparet, prepared with notes by Clifton A. Emahiser

In far too many churches today, the people are taught the New Testament has done away with the Old Testament. This must be discarded and repudiated. In fact, many of them will not even so much as have an Old Testament, but carry only a New Testament, bound separately. This has been a terrible sin on the part of the clergy of these churches, to repudiate 3/5ths of Yahweh’s word.

Most of Yahweh’s promises to us are contained in the Old Testament. Why should anyone teach that Yahweh’s word is worthless, and His promises broken? This only undermines the only foundation for the New Testament. Let’s examine the evidence and see if we have to cast aside most of Yahweh’s word as unworthy of belief. When you hear the evidence, I believe that you will decide as I have, it is all one book, which proclaims one consistent truth from Genesis to Revelation. Neither half of the Bible can be properly understood without the other.

Although there are many others, four key New Testament Scriptures should be sufficient to prove beyond doubt that the Old Testament is not a Jewish book, but rather that with all certainty it is an important and necessary Christian book:

Luke 1: “68 Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people, 69 And hath raised up an horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David; 70 As he spake by the mouth of his holy prophets, which have been since the world began: 71 That we should be saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us; 72 To perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember his holy covenant; 73 The oath which he sware to our father Abraham, 74 That he would grant unto us, that we being delivered out of the hand of our enemies might serve him without fear, 75 In holiness and righteousness before him, all the days of our life.”

Romans 15: “4 For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the scriptures might have hope.”

Ephesians 2: “19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints, and of the household of God; 20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; 21 In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord: 22 In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.”

2 Corinthians 3: “14 But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ. 15 But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the vail is upon their heart. 16 Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the vail shall be taken away. 17 Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.” The vail reading the Old Testament, only taken away in Christ, informs us that the Old Testament is indeed a Christian book. It is not a Jewish book at all because only Christians are able to understand it.

Returning to Comparet:

You know the Old Testament is the history of the Adamic race. It is about the tribes of Israel, Yahweh’s chosen people. The only time any other people are mentioned is when they come in contact with Israel. Consequently there is no mention of Japan, China and many other countries that existed at that time. The Old Testament tells the history of Israel’s past and Yahweh’s prophecies and promises as to their future.

I know you have been taught that the Jews are Israel, no greater falsehood was ever taught to man!! In my other lessons, I have given you the proof the real Israel of the Bible is what today we commonly call the Anglo-Saxon nations. This includes Scandinavia, Germany, Austria, Holland, parts of Belgium, France and Switzerland. It also includes some of the people of Italy, Spain, the people of the British Isles and the descendants of these nations in their former colonies of the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa.

The Jews control the print and electronic media, except for a small portion of the Internet, which they are also trying to control. They ridicule our Christian Identity beliefs, and choose the worst of those associated with them in order to slander and discredit us all. For this reason alone we must be diligent to repudiate all of the trash and baggage which is brought in by clowns and half-wits and associated with Christian Identity.

So the Jews tell the world that Christian Identity is an “anti-semitic” form of “British Israelism”. Now the British Israel people did not have the entire revelation which many of us Identity Christians profess today. But they were not nuts. An examination of British Israel adherents readily shows that these were from among the most educated and erudite Britons of their time. They based their beliefs on classical history and archaeology, as it began to be studied free of Catholic Church dogmas in the centuries following the Reformation. While they maintained some of the Judaized baggage of the Reformers, along with some Anglophile political hostilities, they were certainly on the path to truth.

Now Identity Christians of today can cite classical history, archaeological discoveries, and Biblical prophecies over and over again, and present a clear and coherent picture of our Christian Israel heritage. But while we certainly are on the side of truth, we shall never convince our enemies, who also happen to be in control of the media and influence governments. Even when they are not in direct control of them, they are in political and financial control. This is the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places which Paul of Tarsus had mentioned. What we must do is seek to represent only the truth. As Paul of Tarsus said, we must be responsible adults in our Christian walk, and not allow ourselves to be carried away with every wind of doctrine. Therefore we must reject all those who attempt to introduce damnable heresies. The flat-earthers, the hollow-earthers, the Nibiru crowd, the fools who believe that there are Nazi military bases on the South Pole, the 2012ers and other date-setters, the clowns who think Noah’s ark was a flying saucer, and so on. These people introducing such heresies are departing from the truths that we can establish, and they discredit us in the eyes of those who might otherwise seek them. True Christians must ostracize all of the creators and proponents of these fantastic heresies.

Returning to Comparet:

I have also given you proof the Jews are the descendants of the various Canaanite people, such as the Hittites, Jebusites, Edomites etc., with a mixture of an Asiatic people, the Khazars. None of these Canaanite people are descended from any of the tribes of Israel. In fact, the Jews are identified by our Redeemer Yahshua in John 8:44, as being the children of the devil. The Bible, from beginning to end, tells one unvarying story which contains two themes. (1) The fall of the Adamic race, caused by Satan, which will be cured by the redemption won for us by our Redeemer Yahshua. (2) Satan will fight continuously against our race trying to prevent our redemption, using his own race to accomplish this, but he will fail.

It is not fair to call the original Khazars an “Asiatic people” in the derogatory sense, because the inhabitants of Central Asia were certainly nearly all White until relatively recent times, and included the tribes of the Goths, Alans, Saxons, and other Germanic Israelite people, as well as related Aryans of other tribes, who at one time occupied all the land of Asia at least as far east as Mongolia and Tibet. Of late, the so-called “Khazar hypothesis”, as it is called, is often disputed in mainstream academia, and in White Nationalist and even Christian Identity circles. It is doubtless, that the so-called Jews of today are not properly Ashkenaz, which was the name that Medieval rabbis had very inaccurately applied to Germany, and neither are they truly Khazars. It is certainly evident even in non-Jewish historical sources, that Aryan people dwelt in the land called Khazaria. The Byzantine emperor Leo IV was the son of a Khazar princess, who was at first promised in marriage to Pepin the Short, the King of the Franks. With the risk of oversimplifying the history, we will say that apparently, many Edomite and Babylonian Jews found refuge in Khazaria in the early Middle Ages. After this time, Khazaria seems to have become overrun with the people now known as Turks, whom the Jews employed for military purposes against the Byzantine Empire. Later Khazaria was invaded and overrun by the Mongols, and it is evident that the Jews intermingled with all of these before migrating into Europe. It seems evident that during all of this time the original Khazar pagan population slowly turned to various sorts of Christian, Jewish, and Moslem beliefs. Jews mixed with local populations wherever they traveled, and therefore the “Khazar hypothesis” is a gross over-simplification of the fact that the so-called Ashkenazi Jews are not Israelites. However the Jews among the Khazars, while they had some Israelite blood, were never truly Israelites in the first place. Comparet continues discussing the satanic war against the Adamic race:

It starts in Genesis and is stated clearly in Genesis 3:15 where Yahweh tells Satan, “I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed.” The same Hebrew word zerah, meaning seed or descendant, is used in both places. So the Bible says that Satan is to have just as literal children as Eve. In John 8:44 Yahshua identified these children of Satan as the Jews.

Yahshua also identified them in Luke chapter 11 and elsewhere. Speaking to the Genesis serpent, it is evident from Revelation chapter 12 that Yahweh said these things to Satan, or to a satan, since Yahweh both had and has many adversaries, where Satan is identified with “that old serpent”, which can only be the Genesis chapter 3 serpent.

In Revelation 12 it is evident that Satan had a host of angels, which are not mentioned in Genesis. We believe they are, but they had become a much larger population after the events of Revelation 12 and by the time of the Genesis chapter 3 event, which was actually long after their fall, so they are referred to as a tree, the “tree of the knowledge of good and evil”, and all of its branches would be included in the idea of the serpent’s seed, since they were all related and opposed to God. We believe that Genesis 3 is a parable representing an obscure ancient truth, and Comparet continues by speaking of similar parables in the New Testament:

Yahshua spoke most of His teachings in the form of parables. We will see that He taught this same consistent truth of the conflict between the Adamic, Israelite children of Yahweh and the children of Satan. Because He recognized the Jews as the children of Satan, Yahshua took very great care not to let the Jews learn His gospel. Yahshua concealed the gospel in parables whenever He spoke in the presence of the Jews.

We agree with Comparet here so long as by “Jews” we interpret him to be referring to Judaeans, who could be either Edomite Judaeans or Israelite Judaeans, and we will elaborate a little later.

Furthermore, because in the earliest times the “seed” of the serpent would have to include the entire tree which the serpent represented, we would not confine the concept of the children of Satan to the Jews. Likewise, even history shows that many of the Kenites, Rephaim, Canaanites and Edomites existed outside of Judaea and were never considered to be Jews. So the Jews were of the seed of satan, but they were not the only descendants of such seed. Comparet continues to describe why the Gospel message was concealed to the Judaeans:

This is explained in Matthew 13:10-15 and Mark 4:10-12. Matthew tells us, “And the disciples came and said unto Him, Why speaketh thou unto them in parables? He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given. For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance; but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. Therefore speak I unto them in parables because they seeing, see not; and hearing, they hear not, neither do they understand.... For this people’s hearts is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them.”

Here Bertrand Comparet perpetuates a misunderstanding, and makes an oversimplification, which has caused much confusion when bringing new people who are already familiar with Scripture to the truth of Christian Identity. Examining these words as they are in Isaiah, they were not spoken to Edomites, to the children of the devil, but rather, they were spoken to the people of Jerusalem in general, which in the time of the prophet had included at least as many Israelites as others. In Jeremiah, the people of Jerusalem are represented by a basket of good figs, and a basket of bad figs. Ostensibly, the bad figs were the Canaanite and Kenite infiltrators into Judah and Jerusalem. The Judahites who stayed behind, or went to Egypt, or who were of the families of certain of the disobedient princes of Judah were promised punishment by being handed over to the bad figs. That was fulfilled by 70 AD, since many of the people of Judah followed the Edomite Sadducees in their rejection of Christ, being blind to His Word and following the bad figs instead, were indeed punished in that manner. At the time of Christ the bad figs were represented primarily by the Canaanite and Edomite people who had come to dominate and rule in Judaea. That is the fulfillment of that prophecy of Isaiah. Yahweh God gives His people up to His enemies for their chastisement when they are not obedient to Him. That is the fulfillment of the prophecy of Jeremiah chapter 24 concerning those of Judah who were not obedient to Him. These are the people Paul later prayed for in Romans chapter 9, that they would repent and follow the Gospel instead of following he Edomites. As for the Edomites, they could never repent and be healed, being children of the devil, so they are not the subject of Isaiah’s prophecy.

Continuing with Comparet:

In four parables Yahshua covers a period of 4,000 years and shows Yahweh’s unchanging purpose, it is the same in both Old and New Testaments. Let’s examine the evidence of these four parables, spoken by Yahshua. Let’s see whether Yahweh has ever changed His mind, or whether His word is always good. [Meaning that the God of the Old Testament is consistent with the God of the New Testament.]


This parable is found in both Matthew 21:33-45 and Luke 20:9-19. It covers about the last 1,000 years of the Old Testament and up to the crucifixion of Yahshua, here is how Yahshua told it.

“Hear another parable: There was a certain householder which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country. And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it. And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another. Again he sent other servants, more than the first, and they did unto them likewise. But last of all he sent his son, saying, They will reverence my son. But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir: come, let us kill him, and let us seize his inheritance. And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard and slew him.”

What does this parable mean? Nothing can correctly interpret the Bible except the Bible itself. Everyone who tries to explain it by his own interpretation, or by church doctrines, will always fail. Let’s see what the Bible says about this parable of the vineyard and the husbandmen. The householder planted a vineyard and in it he put a winepress and a tower, so what is this vineyard?

Isaiah 5:1-7 tells us, “My wellbeloved hath a vineyard in a very fruitful hill: and he fenced it, and gathered out the stones thereof, and planted it with the choicest vine, and built a tower in the midst of it, and also made a winepress therein: and he looked that it should bring forth grapes, and it brought forth wild grapes. And now, O inhabitants of Jerusalem and men of Judah, judge, I pray you, betwixt me and my vineyard. What could have done more to my vineyard that I have not done in it? Wherefore, when I looked that it should bring forth grapes, brought it forth wild grapes? And now, I will tell you what I will do unto my vineyard: I will take away the hedge thereof, and it shall be eaten up; and break down the wall thereof, and it shall be trodden down: and I will lay it waste: it shall not be pruned or digged; for there shall come up briers and thorns: I will also command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it. for the vineyard of Yahweh is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah are his pleasant plant.”

Note that the vineyard originally was Israel and Judah, for their sins, they are deported and the land is desolated. There grows up in their place briers and thorns, not His pleasant plant. We know, as a matter of recorded history, that following the captivities the land was overrun with alien, pagan people, the Canaanites and the Edomites who took over the land under king Herod. Hence Yahshua says that it was let out to husbandmen. Both Yahweh’s children and His servants were absent, and others were in possession.

Comparet did very well to connect the vineyard of the parable of Christ to the vineyard of Isaiah chapter 5, for they are certainly telling one and the same story. But the “wild grapes”, who are the disobedient amongst Judah in Jerusalem, are the people to whom Yahweh was speaking when He said “Therefore speak I unto them in parables because they seeing, see not; and hearing, they hear not, neither do they understand.... For this people’s hearts is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them.” When the children of Israel are disobedient, Yahweh sends upon them a spirit of deception, because they have no love for the truth. Concerning the briars and thorns, however, who are the Canaanites and other wicked tribes, Comparet does well again to relate them to the words of Jeremiah chapter 2, where he continues:

This is in confirmation of Jeremiah 2:21 where Yahweh said, “Yet I had planted thee a noble vine, wholly a true seed: how then, are thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine unto me?” What is growing there is no longer the vine which Yahweh planted, it is an alien growth.

In the vineyard was a winepress, the symbol of sacrifice, in place of punishment, that is, the temple. The hedge or wall, and the tower were the symbols of government and defense, that is, the throne of David.

The briers and thorns, the alien husbandmen, were not Yahweh’s servants, for only Israel can qualify as that. In Isaiah 41:8-9 Yahweh says, “But thou Israel, are My servant, Jacob whom I have chosen, the seed of Abraham, My friend. Thou, whom I have taken from the ends of the earth, and called thee from the chief men thereof, and said unto thee, Thou art My servant; I have chosen thee, and not cast thee away.”

Again Yahshua Christ said in Matthew 15:24, “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” But in John 10:26-27 Yahshua said to the Jews “Ye believe not because ye are not of My sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow Me.” So the Jews were definitely not any part of Israel, they were only tenants on the land, truly briers and thorns, an alien growth.

This is true of the leaders of the Judaeans whom Christ was speaking to at the time, but many Judaeans were Israelites and were not children of the devil.

The Jews recognized the Son Yahshua Christ as the heir, and they sought not only to kill Him, but also to seize for themselves the inheritance. They had already seized the land of Judah, and they also wanted to seize the lands held by the modern nations of Israel, who were then moving toward their new homes in Europe. [Actually a good many of them were already there. - WRF] We know that, as the parable tells, they did murder the son. For this most horrible crime in all history, don’t you think they deserved some punishment? The parable goes on, and in Luke 20:15-16. Yahshua said, “What therefore, shall the lord of the vineyard do unto them? He shall come and destroy these husbandmen, and give the vineyard to others. And when they heard it, they said, God forbid!” There was no repentance there, just the desire to be evil without receiving the penalty for it.

In Matthew 21:42-45 Yahshua continues. “Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is Yahweh’s doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes? Therefore I say unto you, the kingdom of Yahweh shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken; but on whom it shall fall, it will grind him to powder. And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard His parables, they perceived that He spake of them.”

Note that the kingdom of Yahweh, which Yahweh had originally established in Palestine, was to be taken away from the Jews, and given to a nation, not a church. Did you say that you didn’t know that the Kingdom of Yahweh was established centuries ago in Palestine? Certainly it was. It is recorded in 1 Chronicles 29:23, “Then Solomon sat on the throne of Yahweh as king, instead of David his father, and prospered; and all Israel obeyed him.” Solomon never sat on Yahweh’s throne in heaven. It was the throne of Yahweh in Jerusalem, so it was Yahweh’s kingdom on earth. The Jews had seized this kingdom of Yahweh by treacherous intrigues and by force. An accurate account of this is recorded in Antiquities of the Jews by Josephus, books 14-18. These books tell how the Edomite Jew Herod became king of Judea.

The kingdom of Yahweh was also wherever His people, true Israel were. The Jews also planned to seize this part of the son’s inheritance, this is confirmed in Ezekiel 35:1-14. “Moreover, the word of Yahweh came unto me, saying, Son of man, set thy face against mount Seir and prophesy against it, and say unto it, Thus saith Yahweh: Behold, O mount Seir, I am against thee, and I will stretch Mine hand against thee, and I will make thee most desolate. Because thou hast said, These two nations and these two countries shall be mine, and we will possess it; whereas Yahweh was there. Thus saith Yahweh, while the whole earth rejoiceth, I will make thee desolate.”

Here Comparet runs a little off course. He is postulating that one country and nation in Ezekiel chapter 35 is Palestine, and the other country and nation in Ezekiel chapter 35 is in Europe. But Europe was never one nation, and the children of Israel in Europe were always many nations, as even Paul of Tarsus explains that “the nations” of his own time who were sacrificing to idols in Europe were “Israel according to the flesh”.

Rather, in Ezekiel chapter 35, Yahweh refers to Israel and Judah as the “two countries” and “two nations” which the children of Edom were coveting, and indeed, the Edomites in rather large numbers had moved into both Israel and Judah after the Assyrian and Babylonian deportations. The lists of Edomite cities forcibly converted to Judaism by John Hyrcanus as they are described in Book 13 of Josephus’ Antiquities shows Ezekiel chapter 35 to have been fulfilled in that manner. Back to Comparet, where he continues to wander off course:

Just as the Jews had used Roman legions to seize Palestine, they knew they could not seize the other lands of Israel, except by using the armies of some other nation. Today, we know this to be Russia. Yahshua knew their plans and warned them it would be a disaster. “Whosoever shall fall upon this stone shall be broken; and on whom it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.” This stone was the stone kingdom mentioned in Daniel 2:34-35,44. “Thou sawest till that a stone was cut without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and broke them to pieces. Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver and the gold broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshingfloors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them; and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain and filled the whole earth. ... And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed; and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever.”

Comparet was correct that Daniel’s Fifth Kingdom was an Israelite kingdom, and must have referred to the Germanic tribes which had indeed destroyed the Roman Empire. But that has no relation to the passage concerning “these two countries” and “these two nations” in Ezekiel chapter 35. Furthermore, the Romans and many of the Greek tribes were also descendants of Israel. There is something else going on here, which is not necessarily connected to the events in Palestine. There was to be a series of world empires that were destined to rule “wheresoever the children of men dwell”, as Daniel explained, and that would include the children of Israel. Those empires came out of Adamic nations, Israel and otherwise. But it is evident from a similar prophecy in Revelation chapter 13 that it is the dragon (characterized as the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jew), the international bankers and merchants, which gives its power to the beast, which are the world empires. But that is a prophecy which is distinct from what is going on in the Palestine of Ezekiel chapters 34 and 35.

Mentioning Russia, Comparet also entirely misses the fact that the same Edomite Jew already controlled England, America and most of Europe through the Anglo-American alliance, and did not need Russia for that purpose. America was controlled by the Jew in 1913, before the Jews took over Russia in the Bolshevik Revolution. But England was controlled much earlier than that, however Germany was not in their full economic control until 1918, and again in 1945. Comparet understood the financial power of the international bankers, and he understood the Jewish control of America and England, but he did not apply his understanding evenly throughout his interpretations of scripture.

Comparet seems to have been politically motivated to include the Russian threat in his interpretations of Scripture, because the Cold War was at its peak at the time. This is sort of like 1960’s fear porn. Such is the danger of letting one’s interpretation of prophecy be affected by emotions and current events.

Comparet continues his discussion of the parable of the Vineyard and the Husbandmen:

Yahshua, by this parable exposed the Jews as interlopers, briers and thorns in Yahweh’s vineyard. These people had taken by deceit, what was not theirs. They also planned to similarly take the other lands which Israel now had, however they would be destroyed in doing so. The Jews knew this, for Luke 20:19-20 says, “And the chief priests and the scribes the same hour sought to lay hands on Him; and they feared the people: for they perceived that He had spoken this parable against them. And they watched Him, and sent forth spies, which should feign themselves just men, that they might take hold of His words, that so they might deliver Him into the power and authority of the government.”

And here Comparet was right, and he did well to connect the Vineyard of the parable to the Vineyard of Isaiah, for they certainly are one and the same. But his references to Daniel chapter 2 and Russia are both out-of-context and fall somewhat short of a full scriptural and historical understanding. He goes on to the second of his four parables which connect the Old and New Testaments:


This parable traces the Jews from the crucifixion, through the Christian era. It is found in Luke 16:1-14 and begins, “And He said also unto His disciples, There was a certain rich man, which had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods. And he called him and said unto him, How is it that I hear of thee? Give an account of thy stewardship; for thou mayest be no longer steward. Then the steward said within himself, What shall I do? For my lord taketh away from me the stewardship: I cannot dig; to beg I am ashamed. I am resolved what to do, that, when I am put out of the stewardship, they may receive me into their houses. So he called every one of his lord’s debtors unto him, and he said unto the first, How much owest thou unto my lord? And he said, An hundred measure of oil. and he said unto him, Take thy bill, and sit down quickly, and write fifty. Then said he to another, And how much owest thou? and he said, An hundred measure of wheat. And he said unto him, Take thy bill and write fourscore.”

We reject the notion that the parable of the unfaithful steward “traces the Jews from the crucifixion, through the Christian era”. In fact Paul of Tarsus asserted that he had been given the stewardship over the nations, to reconcile them with Christ, so the Jews could not be the stewards after Christ had exposed them as children of the devil. Rather, the parable of the unfaithful steward illustrates the behaviour of the Jew whenever he is permitted to come into any position of authority within a Christian nation. But because that happens does not mean that it is right. Rather, it happens because sinful Israelites are being chastised. So the parable is a warning against the Jew. Comparet continues:

This unfaithful steward was the Jew. He had entered the kingdom, claimed citizenship in it, seized the throne and the priesthood, so he had assumed all the responsibilities of stewardship. It records that he had wasted his master’s goods. What were these goods?

First there was the throne of David. Jewish evil influence upon the kings had caused the loss of this throne when king Zedekiah was overthrown, about 589 B.C. [Comparet was correct, if we substitute Kenite and Canaanite for Jewish, although the people known as Jews are Kenites and Canaanites, with which the Edomites were also mixed. (Jeremiah 2, 24, and Ezekiel 16)] The throne of David didn’t cease to exist, one branch of the royal tribe was already on the principle throne in Ireland. The prophet Jeremiah took Tea Tephi, a daughter of King Zedekiah, to Ireland where she married this king, there continuing the throne of David. This throne was lost to the land of Palestine, occupied by the Jews.

Next of their master’s goods was the law. The Jews had rejected this for the Babylonian Talmud, which in Yahshua’s day was called the tradition of the elders. While the Talmud pretends to give service to the law, it doesn’t, but teaches evasion of the law. Therefore Yahshua repeatedly rebuked the Jews for having substituted the Talmud, or tradition of the elders, for the law.

This is true, as Christ had told them that they made the law of God of no effect with their traditions, i.e. Matthew chapter 15. But the Edomites were never supposed to have the law in the first place. Comparet oversimplifies the prophecies and the situation in Judaea, as there were three groups and not two. Judaeans who were blessed and would be turned to Christ, who were Israelites, Bad Figs who were not Israelites, and Judaeans who were destined, according to Jeremiah chapter 24, to be turned over to the Bad Figs for punishment for their disobedience.

In John 5:39, 45-46 Yahshua told the Jews, “Search the scriptures: for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and it is they which testify of Me.... there is one which accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed Me: for he wrote of Me.” In Matthew 15:3, 6-9 Yahshua continues, “Why do ye also transgress the commandment of Yahweh by your tradition?... Thus have ye made the commandment of Yahweh of no effect by your tradition. Ye hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you saying, This people draw nigh unto Me with their mouth, and honoreth Me with their lips; but their heart is far from me. But in vain do they worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.”

But here again, Christ had quoted Isaiah, who was prophesying in reference to Israelites and not in reference to Edomites or Canaanites. Rather, the Israelites were at fault for adopting the alien traditions contrary to the laws of Yahweh their God. The traditions they adopted in place of the law were the commandments of men which caused them to transgress the law.

In Luke 16:29-31 Yahshua said, “They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rose from the dead.” Over nineteen centuries of history bear witness that they have not been persuaded, although one did rise from the dead. They had wasted their master’s goods, the law.

The Edomite did as he should be expected to do with the Master’s goods, since they were never really his to have in the first place, and that is the point of the parable. Furthermore, those words of Christ should be enough to convince Christians that the Jews cannot and should not ever be converted to Christianity. Comparet continues:

The next goods they wasted was the prophets, and the rest of the Old Testament. They rejected the prophets and had murdered them. In Matthew 23:31 Yahshua told them, “Ye be witnesses unto yourselves that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.” [But in Luke chapter 11 Yahshua blames the interlopers, the descendants of Cain, for the blood of the prophets.] Fourth of the goods wasted was the temple, the center of religion. This was lost to the Edomite Jews, the synagogue of Satan, as they are called in Revelation 2:9 & 3:9. The historian Josephus, in his Antiquities of the Jews, book 13 Chapter 9, and books 14 to 18, tells how the Edomites, under Antipater and Herod, took over the temple and murdered the last high priest of the true line of Aaron. Then they set up a succession of scoundrels, as high priests thereafter. Then these bogus high priests conducted a thing of utter evil, in the false guise of the rites of the temple.

The last of the wasted goods was the land itself. They had already lost to the Romans and were soon to lose possession of the land. Yahweh couldn’t trust them with His house, as tenant farmer husbandmen, or as stewards. Yahshua warned the Jews that the stewardship was being taken away from them.

Comparet seems to despise the Romans, but the Romans were the people of Messiah the Prince, as Daniel chapter 9 explains it, who were designated by Yahweh to destroy Jerusalem. So Paul wrote to them in his epistle, that God would “bruise Satan under your feet shortly”. He continues:

What was their response to this? Repentance? Never!! It was, I cannot dig. No, they have never been producers, only parasites on the work of others. They say that they will ingratiate themselves with Yahweh’s debtors by telling them to diminish their debt to Yahweh.

What are the debts we owe to Yahweh? Certainly morality is one. Who controls the theater and the movies, who pours out the flood of filthy, salacious plays and movies? These are movies which now find adultery too tame and are now featuring incest and homosexuality. Who owns the publishing houses which print most of the pornographic books and magazines we find on our newsstands? The answer is the Jews, who else? Can you doubt that the purpose of this is to break down all traces of morality?

And of course Comparet is right about the nature of the Jews, but going a little too far with the analogy he begins to confuse the debtors with the dishonest steward himself, who represents the Jews. But the parable insinuates that even the debtors were Jews! We cannot imagine that the Satanic Jew, being a bastard, actually owes anything to God, or would ever want to repay Him honestly.

Honesty is another debt we owe to Yahweh. Who is it that every nation in the world, by bitter experience, has learned to distrust? Be frank now, haven’t you also been cheated by them, until you learned to be on your guard against fraud? Do you say that they are no longer alone in this quality? True, but who introduced such practices into business? You don’t have to be very old to remember when fraud was cause of surprise as well as indignation. Now most business men have to cut corners if they are going to stay in business against Jewish competition.

Neither is the Jew ever expected to be honest. Yahweh says in Jeremiah chapter 8: “17 For, behold, I will send serpents, cockatrices, among you, which will not be charmed, and they shall bite you, saith the LORD.” Seeing a Jew, one should expect to be bitten.

Loyalty is another debt. You know that from Karl Marx, the grandson of rabbis on both sides of the family, down through Stalin who was half Jewish, married to a Jewess, and both his sons and daughters married Jews, communism has been a Jewish enterprise. Though they claim to be only 3% of our population, the Jews furnish over 90% of all the Red spies and traitors we have been able to catch. You know how they can make a traitor out of any gullible Gentile.

Playing up the Cold War Comparet falls victim to fear porn once again. Capitalism has also always been a Jewish enterprise, and the West was just as much enslaved to the Jews as the Russians were. Based on usury, Capitalism is a curse on our race. The so-called Red spies and traitors were only pawns in a game, since the Jewish bankers controlled both sides of the Cold War all along. Sadly, Comparet fell for the dichotomy being offered by the Jews at that time, which is something that today we must learn from and seek to avoid.

Religion is another debt we owe to Yahweh. Surely, I need not remind you that over the last 19 centuries, the only consistent and permanent enemies of Yahshua and Christianity have been the Jews. The so called higher critics, who sought to discredit the Bible, are Jews. They have constantly tried to get us to abandon our loyalty to our God, Yahweh.

The Jews had only apparently seemed to be the only enemies, because until recently only they have been permitted to roam free in Christian society as equal citizens, and have free entry into all of our educational institutions. The arab, the negro, the Asian, and all other aliens would be enemies just as much as the Jew if they had been granted the same estate.

Yahshua was certainly right in this parable. The unfaithful steward has taught his master’s debtors to diminish their debts. Unfortunately, we have gone along with the other part of the parable and have received the unfaithful steward into our houses. For doing this, we have paid and will pay a fearful price. We can’t say that we haven’t been warned. As we noted earlier, here Comparet does notice that the parable is a warning against Jewish behaviour, a warning which Christians never heeded.

In 2 John 1:7-11 we are told that, “Many deceivers are come into the world, who confess not that Christ has come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an anti Christ. Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but we receive a full reward. Whosoever transgresseth and abideth not in the doctrine of Yahshua hath not Yahweh. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed, for he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.”

Today many are deliberately helping the Jews in their evil work, despite the warning that even to wish them well makes you a partaker of their evil deeds. If you stand in the street and hail Judas, “Yoo hoo! Judas, where are you going? Are you going to get your 30 pieces of silver? Judas, I wish you success.” Can’t you see that you are now participating in his guilt? Yahshua prophesied the entire period of the Christian era and the Jews part in it. This parable tells what is only too true today!

Overall, Comparet did well with this parable. He may have done better if he had been able to understand the Greek of Luke 16:8-9 as we understand and interpret it to say: “8 And the master praised the unrighteous steward because he did wisely, because the sons of this age are wiser than the sons of light are towards their own race. [The debtors were Jews also.] 9 And I say to you, shall you make for yourselves friends from the riches of unrighteousness, that when you should fail they may receive you into eternal dwellings?” And of course, only God receives His children into eternal dwellings, so they should choose to follow Him instead of the sins of the world. The real point of the parable is to show that the Jew, if he is put into a position of authority in the Kingdom of God, will immediately begin to divided up its holdings and give them out to his friends. That is exactly what the Jew has done throughout the Christian nations in modern times.

Here is Comparet’s third parable:


Some of you are thinking, But my minister told me the Jews were going to be converted some day, and then they would convert the Christians! Convert us to what? No, Yahshua told us just the opposite, the Jews will never be converted. The parable of the fig tree, prophetic of the Jews, was so very important that Yahshua both told it in words and then emphasized it by acting it out. The time covered by it begins with Yahshua’s three years of ministry, and extends forever.

Comparet is not entirely clear. It only extends forever, because the Jew will bear no fruit forever. But when there are no more Jews, the parable will become meaningless. Comparet continues:

In Luke 13:6-9, Yahshua told the parable of the fig tree. “A certain man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard, and he came and sought fruit thereon and found none. Then he said to the dresser of his vineyard, Behold these three years I come seeking fruit on this fig tree, and find none: cut it down; why cumbereth it the ground? And he answering said, Lord, let it alone this year also, till I shall dig about it and fertilize it, and it bear fruit, well; and if not, then after that thou shall cut it down.”

Practically all Bible students agree the fig tree is the symbol of the Jews, not Israel. [We would disagree, most denominational Christians wrongly believe “Israel” and “Jews” are synonymous.] The three years Yahshua came seeking fruit on the fig tree, were the three years of His ministry, as recorded in the gospel of John. Yahshua made no converts from among the Jews, only from the few true Israelites of the tribes of Benjamin and Judah among them.

Yahshua said in Matthew 15:24, “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” In John 10:26-27 Yahshua told the Jews, “Ye believe not because ye are not of My sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them and they follow Me.”

[Comparet repeated a paragraph he had used earlier.]

Matthew 21:1 to 26:2 is a continuous story, ending with the crucifixion. Matthew 21:18-19 records, “And when He saw a fig tree in the way, He came to it and found nothing thereon but leaves only; and He said to it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforth forever. And presently the fig tree withered away.” Yahshua acted out this parable in order to make most impressive an eternal truth, the Jews would not produce any fruit forever.

Who is it that brings forth the fruits of the kingdom of Yahweh? Israel of course! Isaiah 27:6 says, “He shall cause them that come of Jacob to take root: Israel shall blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit.” Hosea 14:8 says, “Ephraim shall say, What have I to do any more with idols? I have heard Him and observed Him. I am like a green fir tree. From me is thy fruit found.” From the Jews there would be no fruit forever.

These scriptures in relation to this parable are an excellent observation on Comparet’s part. The world full of Israelite fruit is the world which Yahshua had come to save, but it means the world of the Adamic race, and not the entire planet. As Luke had said, Caesar taxed the whole world. The prophecy in Isaiah had come to pass by the time of Christ.

In speaking of the signs of His second coming, Yahshua made one more reference to the fig tree, the Jewish nation of today in Palestine. In Matthew 23:32-33 Yahshua said, “Now learn the parable of the fig tree: when his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh: so likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.” Yahshua was perfectly consistent, note He speaks of the fig tree putting forth leaves, not fruit. More than this, Yahshua took pains to see that the Jews weren’t converted. He taught among them only in parables they could not understand, which He explained privately to His disciples. Both Matthew 13:10-15 and Mark 4:11-12 record that the disciples asked Yahshua why He spoke only in parables among the Jews. He replied, “Lest at any time they should be converted and their sins should be forgiven them.”

Comparet was right about the fig tree and the leaves and the lack of fruit. But the blindness was to ensure that Jeremiah chapter 24 was fulfilled in the people whom Yahweh promised to make an example of, where it says first of the good figs in their relation to Christ, “6 For I will set mine eyes upon them for good, and I will bring them again to this land: and I will build them, and not pull them down; and I will plant them, and not pluck them up. 7 And I will give them an heart to know me, that I am the LORD: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God: for they shall return unto me with their whole heart.” There Yahweh speaks of the obedient Judahites, and next He speaks of other Judahites who were to be punished, who were to be turned over to the evil figs: “8 And as the evil figs, which cannot be eaten, they are so evil; surely thus saith the LORD, So will I give Zedekiah the king of Judah, and his princes, and the residue of Jerusalem, that remain in this land, and them that dwell in the land of Egypt: 9 And I will deliver them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, to be a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a curse, in all places whither I shall drive them. 10 And I will send the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, among them, till they be consumed from off the land that I gave unto them and to their fathers.” Yahshua did not want certain of the people of Judaea to be converted so that they would be punished in the hands of the evil figs. But He never had a care to convert the evil figs themselves, and they would not believe Him whether He spoke in parables or in plain language. So where Comparet continues, he confounds two groups. The two groups in Judaea at the time of Christ were actually three groups according to the prophecy of Jeremiah: Good figs to be established, evil figs which could not be eaten, and other Judahites who were disobedient and who were going to be turned over to the evil figs. Yet today those last two groups are no longer two, but one, since all the Israelites who disobeyed Christ are now commingled with the Edomite bad figs who rejected Christ. Oversimplifying this, Comparet continues:

Why didn’t Yahshua want the Jews converted? John 8:44-47 explains, “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murder from the beginning, and abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.... He that is of Yahweh heareth Yahweh’s words: ye therefore hear them not because ye are not of Yahweh.”

And of course, in John 8 Yahshua could only have been speaking of the Edomites and Canaanites, who were in large degree descended from the Rephaim and Kenites. These were the evil figs of Jeremiah. But Yahweh blinded the eyes of certain disobedient Israelite Judaeans for their punishment, turning them over to the evil figs.

Yahshua calls us [meaning White Christian Israelites] His brothers. Hebrews 2:12-13 tells us, “For both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one: for which cause He is not ashamed to call them brethren, saying, I will declare thy name unto My brethren: in the midst of the church will I sing praise unto thee.” How could Yahshua ever call a Jew his brother? He has clearly stated several times, that the Jews are the children of the devil. If He called them his brethren, He would have to acknowledge that Satan was His father. No son of Satan could ever be a brother to Yahshua. Now we know why the fig tree will bear no fruit forever.

Comparet established his main point once more, and now he proceeds with his fourth parable proving that the Old and New Testament are inseparable:


The fourth and last parable, is found in both Matthew 25:14-30 and Luke 19:12-17. Its time covers the entire Christian era, beginning with the resurrection of Yahshua. It deals with the true Israel, not the Jews! This parable begins, “A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return. And he called his ten servants and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them occupy till I come, but his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him saying, We will not have this man to reign over us.”

Surely, I don’t need to labor to prove to you that the nobleman, who went away to receive a kingdom, and to return is Yahshua. His ten servants are the ten tribes of Israel. At the time that Yahshua went away, the ten tribes of Israel were on the march in their migration toward their eventual homelands in Europe. {OVERSIMPLIFICATION} A representative group from the other two tribes, Judah and Benjamin, were still in Palestine mixed among the Jews.

Actually, a great number from all twelve tribes were in Europe, but the “representative group” of Judah and Benjamin always referred to them only as ten tribes. However some of the more technically-minded called them the nine-and-a-half, splitting Levi. If one were truly careful and observant of scripture, he would realize that Simeon would have to be split in that manner as well, considering the prophecy of Jacob at Genesis 49:5-7.

Only Israel has ever been called Yahweh’s servant. This is found in many places, such as Isaiah 41:8-9. This was written after Israel had disappeared into the Assyrian captivity, from which they never returned to Palestine. “But thou Israel are My servant, Jacob whom I have chosen, the seed of Abraham, My friend. Thou whom I have taken from the ends of the earth, and called thee from the chief men thereof, and said unto thee, thou art My servant, I have chosen thee, and not cast thee away.”

Most of Judah and Benjamin were also taken into Assyrian captivity. Only the inhabitants of Jerusalem were left behind.

The citizens who rejected Him are the Jews. They are not His servants, nor any part of Israel. They lived in the land for some centuries, in the capital city of Jerusalem, and had become citizens. They did send a message after Him saying, we will not have this man to reign over us.

John 19:15-21 tells us, “Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your king? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar.” When Pilate put the sign on the cross, Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Judeans, it tells us, “Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not the King of the Judeans, but that he said I am king of the Judeans.” When He went away, Matthew 25:14 says that He “delivered unto them (His servants) his goods.” Sometimes, in their money value, it is mentioned as talents and sometimes as pounds. Remember the parable of the unfaithful steward, in which Yahshua told the Jews that they were no longer to have control over His goods? He also told them that the kingdom of Yahweh would be taken from them and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. What were His goods? The same as we said before.

(1) The throne of David. By the time Yahshua spoke this parable, the throne of David had been in the British Isles for over 600 years.

(2) The law. King Alfred the Great, wrote down the accepted customs of England into a code of laws. Here he adopted the Ten Commandments and most of the statutes and judgments out of the Bible. It was the first and only time in history, since the time of Yahshua, that a nation adopted the laws of Yahweh as its own laws. This was the origin of the English common law, and this in turn is the basis for most American law.

Most popular sources agree that Alfred’s laws, called the Doom Book, were the basis for common law, and were based at least partially on the laws of Moses.

(3) The Bible. Only the Christian nations have it all. Most of the Christian nations are the Anglo-Saxon nations of Israel.

As we noted presenting others of Comparet’s sermons, he counted the Germanic nations as “Anglo-Saxon” as well, even if the label is not entirely accurate. The Angles were but one tribe of the Saxon Germanic nations.

(4) The church, successor to the temple. Only the Christian nations ever had this.

We disagree, the temple had no succesor, and the true church is only the assembly of the people of Israel in any given place.

(5) The land. There were two lands, given by Yahweh to Israel. First, the little land of Palestine, which could contain them when they were still very few. Second, their future homelands, for the days when they became too numerous to live in Palestine. In the year 1042 B.C., when David was king and the people of Israel were already living in Palestine, Yahweh said in II Samuel 7:10, “Moreover I will appoint a place for My people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own, and move no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them as beforetime.”

This is true, but still does not make Europe one of the lands of Ezekiel chapter 35.

This couldn’t refer to Palestine, for it spoke of the future, while they were still living in Palestine. It also said that in this future land, they would move no more, whereas they did have to move out of Palestine. Israel had the new lands in Europe and their colonies. After the times of the nations ended, they were to regain the old land in Palestine. So Yahweh’s servants Israel, were left in charge of Yahweh’s goods and He told them to occupy till I come. This is confirmed by Daniel 2:44 which says, “The kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever.” However, we haven’t been true to our trust. When our master returns we will have to make an accounting, both individually and nationally.

The word for occupy actually means to transact business, and not to inhabit lands.

We have allowed the very enemies He named to enter the land, steal His goods and corrupt His religion. Luke 19:15-26 tells of this accounting with His servants. “And it came to pass that, when he was returned, having received the kingdom, then he commanded these servants to be called unto him, to whom he gave the money, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading. Then came the first saying, Master, thy pound hath gained ten pounds. And he said unto him, Well, thou good servant: because thou hast been faithful in a very little, have thou authority over ten cities.... And another came saying, Master behold here is thy pound, which I have kept laid up in a napkin: for I feared thee, because thou art an austere man: thou takest up that thou layest not down, and reapest that thou didst not sow. And he said unto him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow: wherefore then gavest thou not my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury? And he said unto them that stood by, Take from him the pound, and give it to him that hath ten pounds.... For I say unto you, that unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him.”

Now note that stern warning to those people today who say, I’m a Christian, I’m saved and that is all that matters. I refuse to know anything but Jesus Christ and Him crucified. It is not enough for a servant only to save his own hide, and neglect his master’s business. Even the apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 9:24-27 admits that even he could lose his reward of a crown, not his salvation, but his reward, if he neglected his duties.

We have often asserted that most Christians are confused between salvation, which is an absolute promise to all Israel, and reward, which is by the judgment of God for our works. Here we are pleased that Comparet did not share that confusion. While we have asserted (in our presentation of Romans chapters 5 and 6) that this earthly life is meant for man to learn the consequences of sin, here Comparet continues explaining this in his own terms:

We are being trained to administer the kingdom of Yahweh, under the direct rule of Yahshua. The servant who did not improve what he had been trusted with, lost even what he had. It is your duty to know all these things I have been discussing. To make your pound gain others by teaching others the truth. Mark 4:24-25 explains this. “Unto you that hear [as in listen and obey] shall more be given. For he that hath, to him shall be given: and he that hath not, from him shall be taken even that which he hath.”

So much for the accounting the servants had to make to their lord. Now, what of the citizens who hated Him? Yahshua Christ Himself gives us the answer to this in Luke 19:27 where He says, “But those Mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring them hither and slay them before Me.” Now before you start thinking of all the awful names you can call me for making that suggestion, remember that I just quoted the exact words of Yahshua Christ. Possibly you won’t criticize Him quite as severely as you would me.

Too many so-called Identity Christians think that this command is limited to the Jews alone. Yet they neglect Obadiah 15-16, Jeremiah 30:11 and Psalm 118 and the many other passages of Scripture which reveal that all but the children of Israel and the Adamic peoples among them are accounted as God’s enemies.

Remember that when He returns, His first appearance on the earth will be when He stands on the mount of Olives, across the valley east of Jerusalem and there is a great earthquake. Then the Mount of Olives cracks wide open and the city of Tel Aviv falls in the chasm. Now do you understand why so many Jews are going to Palestine? “Bring them hither and slay them before Me.”

While overall Comparet has done well with this parable, here he takes the prophetic Mount of Olives of Jeremiah chapter 14 quite too literally, and he interprets it in same the manner of the Judaized denominational sects. But prophetic Jerusalem refers to the seats of government of the children of Israel wherever they happen to be, and that is not the Edomite people presently in Palestine. The Jerusalem and the Mount of Olives of Zechariah are symbolic, and the prophecy is similar to the “Camp of the Saints” prophecy of Revelation chapter 20. The Jews are certainly not the saints of Yahweh. However other prophecies, such as Malachi chapter 1, do forebode the destruction of the Edomite enemies of Christ, those who returned to rebuild the desolate places.

Comparet concludes his sermon:

So we see that in four parables, the vineyard and the husbandmen, the unfaithful steward, the fig tree, and the servants and the pounds, Yahshua Christ identified the past and prophesied the future of the Jews forever. Yahshua also prophesied the glorious future of the real Israel, who are the Christian, Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian and Teutonic nations of the world today.

Until His return, there can be no greater authority than Yahshua Christ. All that He says must be true. Nothing that He says can be twisted into the idea that Yahweh was mistaken in the Old Testament and had to start over again in the New Testament. Yahshua shows that the whole Bible tells one consistent story. This story is about Yahweh’s fallen children, the race of Israel, who are redeemed by Yahweh as Yahshua Christ. It tells that Satan would fight us thorough this entire age, using his own children to do it. Yahshua identifies these children of Satan as the Jews. Yahweh’s plan will be carried to its triumphant conclusion. Yahweh was right the first time and all the time.

Comparet correctly asserts that the Old Testament is correct, and the New Testament is a continuation of the Old. Yahweh God did not fail in the Old Testament, because the Jews are intruders, thay are not His people.

Critical note by Clifton A. Emahiser: There is not a lot that can be added to Comparet’s message here. I would give Comparet a 99% rating on this lesson. The following is what I wrote in my The Premeditated Murder Of Yahweh In The Flesh, #1 along the same line of thought:

It seems that almost everyone has completely overlooked the political environment which brought on the final resolution for the premeditated murder of Yahweh in the flesh! It’s spelled out so clearly in Scripture, we have no excuse for not comprehending that conspiratorial plot. There is so much utter rot written on this subject by so-called “authorities” that it is simply amazing how they come up with all their convoluted and contrived ideas. But if one is void of the knowledge of some of the factors involved, he is destined to be wrongly persuaded by those who have formed various flawed premises. You will begin to see what I mean as I now point out the political environment under which the children of the serpent finally decided to take our Redeemer’s life:

5500 years after Eden (not Ussher’s erroneous 4004 years), in Judaea, we read at John 11:49-52 the following: “49 And one of them, named Caiaphas, being the high priest that same year, said unto them, Ye know nothing at all, 50 Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not. 51 And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Yahshua should die for that nation; 52 And not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad.”

What Caiaphas was highly implying (in fact, stating that it was imperative) is that it would be better for Yahshua (Yahweh in the flesh) to die rather than for the country of Judaea to perish from being a nation. But Caiaphas went far beyond that with the additional reasoning given by John at verse 52 above. Therefore, we must question: Who where these “children of God that were scattered abroad”? They can be no other than the 12 tribes of Israel mentioned at James 1:1: “James, a servant of Yahweh and of the Savior Yahshua Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.” In other words, Caiaphas was afraid that the Herod controlled nation of Judaea would be overthrown by Yahshua and that He would additionally re-gather the lost tribes that had gone into the Assyrian and Babylonian captivities. This whole plot against Yahshua was to thwart any re-assembling of the true tribes of Israel.

And of course Clifton’s conclusion is correct, as Paul also had attested in Acts chapter 26, that the hope of Israel was for the twelve tribes, and that the Jews were opposed to that hope. Any honest reading of the New Testament proves that the Jews are not the children of Israel, that the Israelites are not Jews, but that the twelve tribes are found in Europe. Identity Christians need to continually refine this message and strive to perfect it, because it is the only Biblical and Historical truth for our White race.

CHR20160408-LetsExamineEvidence.odt — Downloaded 490 times