Explaining Two-Seedline, Part 3: Pragmatic Genesis

Christogenea is reader supported. If you find value in our work, please help to keep it going! See our Contact Page for more information or DONATE HERE!

  • Christogenea Saturdays
ChrSat20131019-TwoSeedline03.mp3 — Downloaded 11914 times

Downloads from old Christogenea website: 2,774

Explaining Two-Seedline, Part 3: Pragmatic Genesis, Genesis Chapter 2 - Program Notes

KJV Genesis 2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. 3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.

Here we have the end of what I would term the First Scroll of Genesis. In ancient times, they did not have books as we know them today. Rather, papyrus was cut and glued in order to form a long scroll which was then used for writing. The scrolls could be rolled up and tied to keep them together. The original writing of Moses was most likely a collection of these scrolls which, once books were developed, were later concatenated into a single volume. However it cannot be ruled out that Moses may have originally used clay tablets rather than scrolls. Clay tablets were used for writing in Mesopotamia all throughout this period, and some of them contained rather long stories. The first books made on a large scale came much later, and were made of vellum which is made from animal skins, which was cut uniformly and bound at one end. There are archaeological discoveries of small books made in part from metal sheets, and also scrolls made from metal sheets, however these were neither practical nor was their use widespread.

Like all books of the Bible, Genesis did not have chapter or verse numbers until well into the Middle Ages, and they were arbitrarily assigned. While many of them were assigned sensibly, many were not. Yet here there is a clear demarcation in the text, where Genesis 2:3 ends the Creation account with the seventh day, where Yahweh God enters into His period of rest.

The scope of the first Genesis account, where it says “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them” cannot be imagined as if it is describing some finite action which ends before Genesis 2:4 begins. Rather, it encompasses the entire idea of the creation of man right through Genesis chapter 5 and beyond, where we see the same exact language used of Adam's descendants. Yahweh entered His Sabbath after Adamic Man was created, however the Creation perpetuates itself, male and female, from the beginning.

A parallel by which we may better understand this language is found in Isaiah 49:5: “And now, saith the LORD that formed me from the womb to be his servant, to bring Jacob again to him, Though Israel be not gathered, yet shall I be glorious in the eyes of the LORD, and my God shall be my strength.” The word Israel here refers to Jacob and to all of his offspring, and they were all created at once when Yahweh formed Jacob in the womb of Rebekah his mother, and even before that since they were all in the loins of Adam. While all Israelites were formed at once, in the loins of Jacob and in the mind of God, Israelites are yet being born into the world today.

Genesis from chapter 1 verse 1 through Genesis chapter 5 and beyond is not a chronologically linear account of a continuing series of events, as so many fools have supposed. If this were so, we would have at least three different races of Adam inhabiting several different earths under the light of several different heavens. All of this seeming conflict is resolved, however, once we realize that the account from Genesis 1:1 through 2:3 is an original account of the Creation of God told from one perspective: where Adamic Man is the pinnacle of that creation, and then from Genesis 2:4 through the end of Genesis chapter 4 there is a separate account of the creation of Adamic Man along with parables relating accounts of his early history, and this separate account builds upon the first Creation account. Finally, Genesis 5:1 begins another new scroll containing an account of the history of the generations of Adam, which is the race of Adamic Man descended from the first Man, Adam.

Genesis 2:4 begins a new account, which details the creation of man from a different perspective, building upon the outline of the creation of man as it was related briefly in the first Creation account.

Examples of recapitulation: Genesis 1:3-5/1:14-16 ; Genesis 1:26-27/2:7/5:1 ; Genesis 10/11 ; Ezekiel 38/39

KJV Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,

Here we have a new scroll, containing a new account relating the creation of man, which opens by summarizing the first Creation account. It is also noticeable, that it rolls up the early days of the first creation account into a single day, or period of time, further establishing the interpretation of those days as ages or epochs.

KJV Genesis 2:5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. 6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.

Verse 5 reflects upon the state of the earth at the third and fourth days of Creation, leading up to the point where the creation of man is proposed in Genesis 1:26.

KJV Genesis 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Genesis 2:7 has long been interpreted as the act by which Yahweh imparted His spirit into the Adamic man. That is fine, but I would insist, however, that if Yahweh is a Spirit, then His image is spiritual, and that the imparting of the Spirit is therefore represented in Genesis 1:26 and 5:3 as well. All three of these are different accounts of the creation of the same Adamic race, beginning with the first man Adam.

Paul of Tarsus says in 1 Corinthians chapter 15: “35 But some will say, ‘How are the dead raised?’ and ‘With what sort of body will they come?’ 36 Foolish! That which you sow, is it not made alive even if it may die? 37 And that which you sow, it is not the body that you sow that will be producing itself, but a bare grain, whether for example of wheat or of any of the rest; 38 And Yahweh gives to it a body just as He has willed, and to each one of those seeds its own body. [Here we see that the Spirit of God is transmitted to each Adamic man through the DNA, or seed. For this reason Peter warned that we must be born from above, of incorruptible seed, rather than of corruptible seed (1 Peter 1:23).] 39 Not all flesh is the same flesh, but one flesh of man, and another flesh of beasts, and another of birds, and another of fish. [Therefore it is folly to make men out of beasts!] 40 And bodies in heaven, and bodies on earth: but different is the effulgence of the heavenly, and different is that of the earthly: 41 one effulgence of the sun, and another effulgence of the moon, and another effulgence of the stars; a star differs in effulgence from stars. 42 In this way also is the restoration of the dead. It is sown in decay [fleshly seed], it is raised in incorruption [the eternal Spirit]. 43 It is sown in dishonor [fleshly seed], it is raised in honor [the eternal Spirit]. It is sown in weakness [fleshly seed], it is raised in power [the eternal Spirit]. 44 It is sown a natural body [fleshly seed], it is raised a spiritual body [the eternal Spirit]; if there is a natural body [fleshly seed], there is also a spiritual [the eternal Spirit]. 45 And just as it is written, “The first man Adam came into a living soul,” the last Adam into a life producing Spirit. [This is true of both Adam and Christ, but one is an analogy for the first, and the other is an analogy for the second!] 46 But the spiritual was not first; rather the natural, then the spiritual: 47 the first man from out of earth, of soil; the second man from out of heaven. [Adam represents the first man from out of earth, Christ the second from out of heaven, however this is all an analogy for the two natures of the Adamic man, the fleshly and the spiritual.]

KJV Genesis 2:8 And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.

The word eden, or edin, is found in Sumerian texts where it is clearly a reference for the steppe. This word was borrowed into Akkadian, where it was spelled edinu. In his Hebrew dictionary, Strong merely defined the word, after it's obvious Hebrew root, as pleasure. The root can also mean soft or pleasant (cf. Strong #'s 5727 through 5731).

Eastward in Eden: in the eastward part of Eden, as the NAS and the Greek of the Septuagint also have.. The writing is from a Hebrew perspective, and there one needs only look to the east of the Levant for the location of the garden, which Moses describes more accurately further on in the chapter, in the text found at verses 10 through 14.

KJV Genesis 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; ...

It is possible that these are literal food-producing trees, and those which follow in the second part of the verse are meant to be allegorical trees. However in any event, every tree that is “pleasant to the sight and good for food” did not exist until Adam was placed in the Garden. If it is accepted that these trees are allegorical trees representing family lines, then these trees can only be the early Adamic families of our race. Later, this same analogy was indeed used to describe the Adamic Genesis 10 Nations, in Ezekiel chapter 31: “1 And it came to pass in the eleventh year, in the third month, in the first day of the month, that the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, 2 Son of man, speak unto Pharaoh king of Egypt, and to his multitude; Whom art thou like in thy greatness? 3 Behold, the Assyrian was a cedar in Lebanon with fair branches, and with a shadowing shroud, and of an high stature; and his top was among the thick boughs. 4 The waters made him great, the deep set him up on high with her rivers running round about his plants, and sent out her little rivers unto all the trees of the field. 5 Therefore his height was exalted above all the trees of the field, and his boughs were multiplied, and his branches became long because of the multitude of waters, when he shot forth. 6 All the fowls of heaven made their nests in his boughs, and under his branches did all the beasts of the field bring forth their young, and under his shadow dwelt all great nations. 7 Thus was he fair in his greatness, in the length of his branches: for his root was by great waters. 8 The cedars in the garden of God could not hide him: the fir trees were not like his boughs, and the chestnut trees were not like his branches; nor any tree in the garden of God was like unto him in his beauty. 9 I have made him fair by the multitude of his branches: so that all the trees of Eden, that were in the garden of God, envied him.”

the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

The tree of life is Yahweh God, Yahshua Christ, and His race of Adamic man. This is proven in Genesis 3:22, where the man is instructed to grasp the tree of life, and live forever: since Adamic man has eternal life only through Christ, therefore Christ must be the Tree of Life. He is the vine, his Adamic people are the branches, and therefore the Tree of Life is the River of God, the Race of Adam with Christ as its head and its root. These are the wheat of the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares, which were planted at the beginning of the world, which happened at the founding of Adamic society.

However if He is the “true vine” and His people are the branches, that suggests that there is a spurious vine with its own branches, and therefore if the Tree of Life is a race, it only makes sense that the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil is also a race. But what race? If Adam is the first man, as Paul also attested, then if we are compelled to read this chapter chronologically, Adam does not yet even have a wife in which there may be other men, however this other tree is already in the garden! Matthew 13:35 tells us exactly why we must turn to the words of Christ to understand these things, and not rely upon Genesis alone for our understanding: “That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.”

John 15: “1 I am the true vine... 5 I am the vine, ye are the branches...” The Son of Man sowed the good seed, because Yahshua Christ is Yahweh God Incarnate: He is Root and Branch, and First and Last, therefore He is Son and He is Husbandman. As He tells us in the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares, in that same part of Matthew 13 where Christ told us that He “will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world,” His enemy sowed the bad seed, and only His words reveal the identity of His enemy. In Luke chapter 10 we see that He Himself tells us who they are.

From Luke Chapter 10, from the CNT: “17 Then the seventy-two returned with great joy saying: 'Prince, even the demons are subjected to us by Your Name!' 18 And He said to them 'I beheld the Adversary (which is Satan, or the Enemy) falling as lightning from heaven! 19 Behold! I have given to you authority to tread upon serpents and scorpions, and upon all the power of the enemy, and no one shall by any means do you injustice. 20 But in this you must not rejoice: that spirits are subject to you. Rather, rejoice that your names are inscribed in the heavens.' 21 At that hour He rejoiced in the Holy Spirit and said 'I give praise to You, Father, Sovereign of the heaven and of the earth, that You have hidden these things from the wise and intelligent and have revealed them to babes. Yeah, Father, because such have had approval before You! 22 All things have been given over to Me by My Father, and no one knows who the Son is if not the Father, and who the Father is if not the Son, and the Son shall reveal it to whom He should determine.'”

Therefore in Luke chapter 10 we see that Satan (the Adversary), demons, serpents and scorpions are all related. Yet throughout the New Testament we see that term serpent used allegorically of certain people opposed to Christ, people whom He also said were not his sheep (John 10) and who had a Father, and therefore an origination, who was someone other than His father, and a devil.

This fall of Satan is mentioned in one other place in Scripture, in Revelation chapter 12, again from the CNT: “7 And there was a war in heaven, Michael and his messengers fighting with the dragon. And the dragon fought, and his messengers, 8 and they did not prevail, nor was their place found any longer in heaven. 9 And the great dragon had been cast down, that serpent of old, who is called the False Accuser and the Adversary; he who deceives the whole inhabited earth had been cast into the earth, and his messengers had been cast down with him.

Now it can be made manifest that this prophecy in Revelation Chapter 12 has multiple fulfillments, and the word heaven is not necessarily to be taken literally in its interpretation. However certain things are absolutely clear in this prophecy, and we can be certain of the following conclusions:

  • Satan was cast out of heaven, and his place is found there no longer.

  • Satan, the Great Dragon, the Serpent of Old, the Devil, and the Fallen Angels are all one and the same entity. And the phrase “Serpent of old” can only refer to the Genesis chapter 3 serpent of the Garden of Eden.

  • The serpent, connected to the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in Genesis chapter 3, already being in the Garden when Adam was placed there, the War in Heaven and the fall of the angels which sinned, as Jude calls them, must have taken place before the creation of Adam, yet this was not revealed “kept secret from the foundation of the world” , as we are told by Christ Himself.

  • Herod the Great, who attempted to slay the Christ-child as soon as it was born, was also a representative of this Satan.

  • This Satan has made war with the Woman, symbolic of the children of Israel, ever since.


Here are some further revelations concerning these fallen angels, from the apostle Jude:

5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not. 6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. 7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.”

Here in Jude verses 5 through 7 we have certain of the children of Israel who failed being compared to “the angels which kept not their first estate”, whose sin was in like manner to those of Sodom and Gomorra in that they committed fornication and went after strange (different) flesh. In other words, the people of Sodom and Gomorra lusted after flesh which was different from their own, in like manner to the fallen angels! And it is the fallen angels who are “reserved in everlasting chains under darkness” awaiting the great day of judgment.

But they are still here. If they were not still here, Jude would not have been able to refer to them in verse 8, and in the present and future tenses, where he wrote: “8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities. [He cannot be talking about the children of Israel of the people of Sodom, but about the fallen angels, and the devil of the next verse.] 9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee. 10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves. 11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core. 12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots; 13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.”

The way of Cain is the way of race-mixing, as is the error of Balaam. While Kore was an Israelite, nevertheless he, like Cain before him, tried to set up his own priesthood opposed to the ordained priesthood of Yahweh God. The fallen angels are still here, they are opposed to Christ, they are brute beasts, mating with them is the pursuit of strange (different) flesh, they are bound in allegorical chains of darkness, they are spots in our feasts of charity, they are twice-dead trees and they are broken cisterns! The fallen angels are therefore the people whom Yahweh did not plant, represented today by all bastards and non-White races! The apostle Peter talks about these same entities in the second chapter of his second epistle, using language very similar to that of Jude. There he says of them in verse 12: “But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption...” The fallen angels are the “tree of the knowledge of good and evil” because knowledge is experience, they were once good, and in their rebellion they became evil.

While it is apocryphal in any extant form, and while we should have reason to distrust the Ethiopic editions, it is quite clear that the apostles quoted from a version of the Book of Enoch which was available in their day, and which we no longer have available to us in the same form. Studying the Enoch literature, perhaps it is better that the fragments found in the Dead Sea Scrolls are considered, rather than the Ethiopic version. This following paragraph is from my paper, available at Christogenea, entitled The Problem With Genesis 6:1-4:

With this in mind, it is now possible to understand how a “serpent”, a member of this fallen race, could have seduced Eve, as the account in Genesis chapters 2 and 3 relates. This race, called the “tree of knowledge of good and evil” (Gen. 2:9, 17) in that account, which itself is a parable, was unmentioned in the creation account of Genesis 1:1-2:3 simply because it was not a part of the creation here on this earth, which is the perspective of the creation story, [which is] itself a sort of prophetic vision of things past. The word translated “day” in these verses is more practicably rendered “age” in context, and therefore the earth may well have existed for four billion or so years before Adam, and many other races of people have been here before the appearance of modern White man, as the fossil record reveals. Yet no other race of men except Adamic White man can be accounted for as having been created by Yahweh, the God of the Bible. In the Enochic literature, in what is called The Book of Giants, the race of fallen angels is said to have perpetrated the corruption of species. From another edition of the Qumran scrolls, The Dead Sea Scrolls, A New Translation by Michael Wise, Martin Abegg Jr. and Edward Cook, on page 247, a translation of 1Q23, fragments 1 and 6: “1 [... two hundred] 2 donkeys, two hundred asses, two hund[red ... rams of the] 3 flock, two hundred goats, two hundred [... beast of the] 4 field from every animal, from every [bird ...] 5 [...] for miscegenation [...]”. And in the same source, 4Q531, fragment 2: “1 [...] they defiled [...] 2 [... they begot] giants and monsters [...] 3 [...] they begot, and, behold, all [the earth was corrupted ...] 4 [...] with its blood and by the hand of [...] 5 [giants] which did not suffice for them and [...] 6 [...] and they were seeking to devour many [...]  7 [...] 8 the monsters attacked it.” Again, 4Q532, Col. 2 fragments 1-6: “2 [...] flesh [...] 3 al[l ...] monsters [...] will be [...] 4 [...] they would arise [...] lacking in true knowledge [...] because [...] 5 [...] the earth [grew corrupt ...] mighty [...] 6 [...] they were considering [...] 7 [...] from the angels upon [...] 8 [...] in the end it will perish and die [...] 9 [...] they caused great corruption in the [earth ...] 10 [... this did not] suffice to [...] 11 they will be [...]”. While quite fragmentary, the general theme of these fragments from what is known as the Book of Giants is readily evident. A very similar version of what is related here is found in 1 Enoch, i.e. chapters 86 and 88. It is highly probable that accounts such as these were the inspiration for the ancient chimera myths of both Greek and Near East mythology.

The apostle John in chapter 4 of his first epistle tells us that the people of Christ are born of God, and that the enemies of Christ are originated in the world, and are not of God. From the King James Version, 1 John 4: “1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.... 4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world. 5 They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them. 6 We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error....” John then goes on to explain that for this reason those born of God should love one another.

The apostle Paul tells us in Hebrews chapter 11:8 “But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.” We are sons of God, or we are bastards born of the sins of the world. There is no third choice, and in all of the eschatological parables and promises of the Bible, there is never a third choice given between righteous men and wicked men. The “mystery of iniquity” is entirely genetic. Therefore the apostle Peter tells us in the opening chapter of his first epistle, 22 Your souls having been purified in the obedience of the truth for brotherly love without hypocrisy, from of a pure heart you should love one another earnestly, 23 being engendered from above not from corruptible parentage, but from incorruptible, by the Word of Yahweh who lives and abides, 24 since 'All flesh is as grass and all of its glory as a flower of grass; the grass withers and the flower falls off, 25 but that which is spoken by Yahweh abides for eternity.' Now this is that which is spoken, which is announced to you.”

Even if we wanted to believe that non-White races were among the beasts of God's creation, a supposition which we have not one shred of hard evidence to support, then we should heed the words of the apostle Peter. In 2 Peter chapter 2 the apostle, talking about those who are feasting among the children of Israel who do not belong, calls them “natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed”. In the prophet Obadiah this same thing is promised, in verses 15 and 16. Whenever Christians think of so-called “pre-Adamic men”, the fallen angels should immediately come to mind. Whenever Christians consider non-White races, the miscegenation of the fallen angels should come to mind, and the Scripture that tells us that they are bound in “chains of darkness”! This is precisely what the Bible teaches about the other so-called races.

There are many other ways to look at this in Scripture. For instance, Egypt, Ethiopia and Sheba were at one time all great White nations, and all are listed among the descendants of Noah in Genesis chapter 10. Yet in Isaiah chapter 43 Yahweh says to the children of Israel: “ 3 For I am the LORD thy God, the Holy One of Israel, thy Saviour: I gave Egypt for thy ransom, Ethiopia and Seba for thee. 4 Since thou wast precious in my sight, thou hast been honourable, and I have loved thee: therefore will I give men for thee, and people for thy life.” Now if Yahweh gave up Egypt, Ethiopia and Sheba for the children of Israel, who did he give them up to? And if Negroes and Arabs overran these countries, and if Negroes and Arabs occupy their lands today, then Negroes and Arabs are among the enemies of Yahweh God. This is Biblical reality, and there is no other way to explain the fates of Egypt, Ethiopia and Sheba.

KJV Genesis 2:10 And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads. 11 The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold; 12 And the gold of that land is good: there is bdellium and the onyx stone. 13 And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia. 14 And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.

Moses is giving a geographical description which correlates to his own time, approximately 1500-1450 BC. Of course, Havilah, Cush [Ethiopia] and Asshur were not even born until after the Flood of Noah, and therefore these names could not have belonged to the regions which they described in the time of Adam.

The land of Havilah can be identified as having been in Arabia, from Genesis 25:18 and 1 Samuel 15:7. Therefore the first river, the Pishon (Pison), may be identified with a river which is now dried-out that once flowed through the Arabian Desert, ostensibly before it was a desert. Archaeologists call this river the Kuwait River. It evidently had its sources in the mountains of Western Arabia, near the Red Sea, and flowed eastward to the Euphrates. The second river, the Gihon seems to refer to the Karun River, which flows from the Zagros Mountains and currently empties into the confluence of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. The third river appears to be the Tigris, and the fourth the Euphrates, which together encompass Mesopotamia.

These four rivers emptied into the Persian Gulf running into the same confluence, and three of them are still there today. Evidently, as can also be determined from ancient history, the Arabian peninsula was a much more fertile place at one time. However the English version of the language of Genesis seems to indicate that the rivers flowed in the opposite direction, and we are informed that it had not yet rained upon the earth in verse 5, so the rivers may not have formed in the manner which we today understand the forming of rivers through rainfall. However the Greek version says that the river was divided into four beginnings, or sources, and not necessarily four heads.

Therefore however the Antediluvian ecosystem functioned, what we can conclude here is that Moses depicted the ancient Garden of Eden as all of the land from the current-day Arabian peninsula and the Red Sea in the west, to the Zagros Mountains of Persia in the east, and centered in the ancient land of Sumer or as it was later called, Babylonia. All of this simple Biblical interpretation excludes the British-Israel 19th century pipe-dreams which identified the Pamir Plateau as the homeland of the original patriarchs.

KJV Genesis 2:15 And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. 16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: 17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

It matters not whether “every tree of the garden” is taken literally or figuratively, since it either refers to food trees, or to the trees which describe the later Adamic families. Here, one may imagine this to be a parable, that Adam's instructions were possibly to create a culture, and therefore he is depicted as one who is commanded to cultivate a garden, the garden being the Garden of God and the establishment of a society formed around a race of people in His image.

The reference to “every tree of the garden” is certainly not a reference to other so-called races, since they are not a part of the Tree of Life and have never - until the sins of our recent past - been included as part of any White culture. Rather, the other races are branches on the Tree of the knowledge of good and evil, and Adam was told to stay away from them. They are angels bound in chains of darkness. That is why the parable of the net contains only two races of fish: good fish and bad fish! Yahweh made nothing bad. Rather, the bad are from the tree of knowledge of good and bad.

A parable is a story which uses symbols and allegories to relate some truth related to a greater lesson or principle. Therefore these early chapters of Genesis are a series of episodes told in parables, and as we clearly saw in Genesis chapter 1 (or better, the first scroll of Genesis) they need not necessarily be understood in exact chronological order. However they do need to be understood in context with the revelations of Christ in the New Testament!

KJV Genesis 2:18 And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him. 19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. 20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.

This is not a new creation of animal-kind. Rather it is a reference back to the fifth day of creation where God already created the animals. It is another Genesis recapitulation. Now, the animals which God created are presented to Adam, however Adam found that none of them were suitable to mate with. Of course, Yahweh already knew that and had already intended to create a mate for Adam. The sin of the fallen angels was to miscegenate themselves with animal-kind. Realizing that, it becomes quite evident that here Adam is given a lesson: that nothing in animal-kind is suitable to mate with. Adam could only have a wife who is flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone.

KJV Genesis 2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; 22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. 23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

The only suitable mate for any White man is a White woman, who is of the same flesh and bone. As Jude tells us in his short epistle, fornication is the pursuit of strange, or different, flesh. There are many warnings in the New Testament not to commit fornication, and other proofs that fornication is indeed race-mixing.

24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. 25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

They were naked, and not ashamed, however in Genesis Chapter 3 we shall see that a race-mixing incident does occur, and then they were indeed ashamed of their nakedness.

ChrSat20131019-TwoSeedline03.odt — Downloaded 870 times