Other Two-Seedline Programs

Christogenea Europe, July 19th, 2015: Early Two-Seedline

CHR-Euro-2015-07-19-EarlyTwoSeedline.mp3 — Downloaded 4052 times
 
00:00

The introduction for this program employed information found at Clifton Emahiser's website here: Early Celtic Church Taught Physical Seduction Of Eve!! and here: Early Church Era On Two Seedline

The following are William Finck's notes for the program:

A brief discussion of the universalist poison of Clement, Origen and Eusebius

Clement of Alexandria misused the phrase “brood of vipers” in Book 1 Chapter 11 of The Instructor (Paedagogus) and in Book 4 chapter 16 of The Stromata. Then in his Exhortation to the Heathen, Chapter 1, ascertained that one could go from being of the “brood of vipers” to being a man of God by accepting Christ:

Again, therefore, some venomous and false hypocrites, who plotted against righteousness, He once called “a brood of vipers.” But if one of those serpents even is willing to repent, and follows the Word, he becomes a man of God.

The universalist position of Scripture was expressed by Clement of Alexandria, and after him it was continued by his student Origen, another Alexandrian, and then by Eusebius. By the time of Eusebius, it seems to be the only position he could imagine, although he neglected to mention at least some of his own theological opponents, such as Methodius of Olympus.

A KJV Bible with a Good Center Reference Teaches and Proves Two Seedline, Part 2 - Christogenea Internet Radio 05-31-2013

 
00:00

Previous Website Downloads: 

2,134

A KJV Bible with a Good Center Reference Teaches and Proves Two Seedline - Christogenea Internet Radio 05-24-2013

 
00:00

Previous Website Downloads: 

2,300

The Problem with Genesis 4:1 - May 5th, 2012

 
00:00

Previous Website Downloads: 

7,341

Clifton Emahiser and William Finck, this program is based on Clifton's article, The Problem with Genesis 4:1

The Seedline Controversy in Identity - 05-04-2012

CHR20120504-TwoSeedlineControversy.mp3 — Downloaded 938 times
 
00:00

Previous Website Downloads: 

6,577

Clifton Emahiser and William Finck, this program is based on Clifton's article, The Great Two Seedline Controversy War In Identity

The original Talkshoe audio recording of this program was of a very poor quality. This recording has now been replaced with one we made ourselves, except for the first 6 minutes and 23 seconds, which are from the original because our recording was started late. After the 6:23 mark, the audio quality is fine. If you are one of the first 59 people who downloaded this podcast, we apologize for the inconvenience and encourage you to download it again.

Thank you, and praise Yahweh!
William Finck

The Battle for the Priesthood - 04-27-2012

CHR20120427-Battle-for-Priesthood.mp3 — Downloaded 843 times
 
00:00

Previous Website Downloads: 

6,745

Clifton Emahiser and William Finck discuss one of Clifton's latest essays:

The Battle for the Priesthood

The Angels Chained in Darkness - 06-10-2011

CHR20110610-AngelsChained.mp3 — Downloaded 2152 times
 
00:00

Previous Website Downloads: 

6,398

With Clifton Emahiser - See Clifton's series on the topic at http://emahiser.christogenea.org. There were no real notes for this segment, however citations were taken from 2 Peter chapter 2, Jude, and the paper found here titled The Problem With Genesis 6:1-4

Here is one citation referenced for this program: 

Dialogue of Justin, Philosopher and Martyr, with Trypho

Chapter IV.—The Soul of Itself Cannot See God.

“‘Is there then, ’says he, ‘such and so great power in our mind? Or can a man not perceive by sense sooner? Will the mind of man see God at any time, if it is uninstructed by the Holy Spirit? ’

“‘Plato indeed says, ’replied I, ‘that the mind’s eye is of such a nature, and has been given for this end, that we may see that very Being when the mind is pure itself, who is the cause of all discerned by the mind, having no colour, no form, no greatness—nothing, indeed, which the bodily eye looks upon; but It is something of this sort, he goes on to say, that is beyond all essence, unutterable and inexplicable, but alone honourable and good, coming suddenly into souls well-dispositioned, on account of their affinity to and desire of seeing Him.’

“‘What affinity, then, ’replied he, ‘is there between us and God? Is the soul also divine and immortal, and a part of that very regal mind? And even as that sees God, so also is it attainable by us to conceive of the Deity in our mind, and thence to become happy? ’

“‘Assuredly, ’I said.

“‘And do all the souls of all living beings comprehend Him? ’he asked; ‘or are the souls of men of one kind and the souls of horses and of asses of another kind? ’