- Christogenea Internet Radio
This evening I have a presentation which I was scheduled to give at the upcoming Florida League of the South State Conference, but due to circumstances beyond my control, I will not be able to attend. While I am saddened by that situation, men cannot be entirely confident what the future may bring, and for that reason we can never be certain of what we may be able to do tomorrow, even when we truly desire to keep our commitments. Because the format for this presentation has changed, I lengthened it somewhat as it was originally meant for about 45 or 50 minutes. I have not added anything to the theme, but only elaborated on some of the explanations. This subject was also the theme of a conversation which I had with Dr. Michael Hill some months ago, but of course in that circumstance I was not able to present this in its entirety. Hoping to do that in January, but having a necessity to change my plans, I will present it here and now. I pray that members of the Florida League of the South also listen to it here instead, as I believe they should hear it, and I pray that they consider what is said.
We all want to separate ourselves from the evil American empire. We all want to see the fall of what the Christian scriptures describe as Mystery Babylon. But there are righteous causes for secession, and there are unrighteous causes. We can only hope to be worthy of Christian liberty when we follow Christ and keep His commandments. So long as we continue on any other path, we are only deserving of tyranny, and we shall never secede. Then even if the American Empire crumbles, so long as our State is infested with sin, and we accept it, it will only fall subject to even worse tyranny. God will not be mocked. He will grant us deliverance from tyranny only upon our collective repentance, and even repentance is a gift from God, so we had better pray for it [Acts 5:30-31, 2 Timothy 2:24-26]. Do not be deceived: we shall never somehow bypass our God and vote our own way to freedom. These are not just words; this is truth, and you have no other choice but utter failure.
The Widening Gulf and the Tolerance of Evil
Modern Americans are now so far detached from their colonial roots that most of them would not even understand some of the things which we shall say here, mostly because they have no basis in any knowledge that such understanding requires. Modern Americans are now so far detached from their Christian past, and so much imbued with Jewish so-called “pop culture”, which is even spread in their churches, that they would be offended by some of the things which we shall say here.
Only 250 years ago, Thomas Paine’s Common Sense was the most popular publication in America. It was read in churches, taverns and meeting halls throughout the thirteen States, and it was certainly the document most responsible for garnering support in the cause of secession from Britain. But that cause was very much a moral cause, triggered by the perceived injustices of a nobility which was above the law. Only in that limited sense did Thomas Jefferson state that all men are created equal, but he failed to express it fully enough at a particularly crucial moment in history, and modern misconceptions haunt us today. Jefferson clarified himself in later writings, but it was too late and perhaps he could not have foreseen how the abbreviated statement would be abused in future generations.
It may be argued that Thomas Jefferson was not a Christian, but the argument is deceitful. While he was no Christian in the traditional church use of the word, he did believe in the commandments and other teachings of Christ, and Christ Himself had only demanded that His disciples keep His commandments, and love their brethren [John 14:15, 15:10]. That Jefferson did, along with most colonial Americans. So while today further argument may be made as to what law it is in the eyes of which men are presumably equal, even Thomas Paine, who openly considered himself a Deist and not a Christian, received overwhelming approval by his peers when he explained that very thing in Common Sense, in the closing paragraphs of his essay where he wrote:
But where, say some, is the King of America? I’ll tell you, friend, he reigns above, and doth not make havoc of mankind like the Royal Brute of Great Britain. Yet that we may not appear to be defective even in earthly honours, let a day be solemnly set apart for proclaiming the Charter; let it be brought forth placed on the Divine Law, the Word of God; let a crown be placed thereon, by which the world may know, that so far as we approve of monarchy, that in America the law is king. For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other. But lest any ill use should afterwards arise, let the Crown at the conclusion of the ceremony be demolished, and scattered among the people whose right it is.
So tens of thousands of colonial Americans, and especially of the educated classes, approved of Paine’s words where he said that only the laws of God in our Scriptures should rule as king over America. Reading the writings of Madison, Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, and others of the founding fathers of this nation, they founded a Republic based upon Christian principles guided by the Word of God. But the words which we should focus upon in that paragraph which we just read from Common Sense are these: “But lest any ill use should afterwards arise, let the Crown at the conclusion of the ceremony be demolished, and scattered among the people whose right it is.”
Paine’s Common Sense was published on January 10th, 1776, and Thomas Jefferson wrote just six months later that “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it…” Those words are in the preamble to the Declaration of Independence. Fittingly, January 10th is also the date in 1861 upon which Florida first tried to exercise that right and declared its independence, but the right was ultimately revoked by tyrants. Today in America, we have suffered from ill use for a long time, and it is far past the time that the Crown be removed from the government and returned to the people.
In 1869 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Salmon Chase, presented a ruling in a case known as Texas vs. White in which he cited the Articles of Confederation, which contained a “perpetual union” clause, in a decision concluding that the secession of any State is illegal, or unlawful under the Constitution. So Chase had dishonestly cited a contract which had long ago been broken by mutual consent, in order to unjustly enforce a contract which should have been broken as it no longer merited consent. But the man who is most credited for having written the Constitution would not have agreed with Salmon Chase.
In what has become known as Federalist Paper Number 40, written in January of 1788, James Madison, the so-called “Father of the Constitution”, wrote of the Articles of Confederation and the “perpetual union” that they formed, and then in relation to what he called the “fundamental principles of the Confederation” he asked the question “What are these principles? Do they require that, in the establishment of the Constitution, the States should be regarded as distinct and independent sovereigns?” To that Madison then supplied his own answer: “They are so regarded by the Constitution proposed.” This was six months before the Constitution was ratified, and Madison was certainly not ignorant of the fact that the Constitution did not include the phrase “perpetual union”. That is precisely why Madison wrote that paper, because he was in support of the independence and sovereignty of the States against the “perpetual union” of the Articles of Confederation.
Even as late as 1839 former president John Quincy Adams, a New England Yankee and an avowed Federalist much of his life, in a famous speech on The Jubilee of the Constitution had acknowledged the sovereignty and independence of the States. There he wrote that the “perpetual union” under the Articles of Confederation was “spontaneous, unstipulated, unpremeditated”, and that as a result the States had “relaxed their union into a league of friendship between sovereign and independent states.” Having once been a Federalist, Adams was only being honest in his assessment of the documents, and he was the son of former president John Adams, who was the only president ever elected from the Federalist Party. So secession is not illegal, but rather, the American government has been illegal since at least 1861 when it unjustly acted against the seceding sovereign States.
So the men who wrote the founding documents of these United States believed in secession, and men such as Paine had also professed that immorality is a valid grounds for secession. Likewise, and on more than one occasion, Christ Himself had attested that fornication is the only valid grounds for divorce, and because the laws of God actually compel a spouse to depart from a fornicator, Christians are compelled to depart from an evil government. When men are forced to accept sinners, that is not liberty, but rather, it is tyranny. When men force other men to obey laws which are contrary to the law of God, that is not liberty, that also is tyranny. We are being ruled and even oppressed by tyrants. The tyrants have been enforcing an unholy union between the righteous and the wicked, and today there is an ever-widening gulf between the two camps. Sadly, not all of us are going to end up on one shore or the other, but some of us are evidently going to drown in the middle.
Humanism is a rejection of God, and it espouses the constantly failed belief that human virtue and morality can be maintained by human reasoning. That did not sustain either Greece or Rome, and it is not sustaining America today. The Scriptures teach that man without the spirit of God is little but a beast, and has no inherent righteousness of his own. But now humanism is the prevailing religion of pop culture, because it is the true religion of the enemies of Christ, and it has gradually been embraced by governments, by corporations and even by churches everywhere since the French Revolution. At the same time, the “liberty” declared in those same ideals is a deception, it is a false humanist concept. We can only have true "liberty" when we subject ourselves to God and keep His commandments. Then He gives us liberty. Otherwise, we inevitably fall victim to tyranny. This cycle is inescapable so long as we tolerate sin. Tyranny is the inevitable result of sin and depravity because sin and depravity are contrary to our ethnic European spirit and our Christian values, and therefore wherever sin is upheld tyranny is required to protect the sinners.
Therefore American governments over these past several decades have required more and more laws to regulate no-fault divorce, to protect so-called abortion rights, and to allow sodomites and other types of perverts to wander freely and spread their corruption. In turn, that has also resulted in the consequence that those governments have violated the rights of the righteous. But sinners do not care about the righteous since the tyrants now define what is right for America, rather than God. The law is no longer king, perversion and corruption and the money which bought them are now king.
The very idea that a nation could be both great and immoral is primarily a Jewish conception which has been forced upon Christians in the name of liberalism. There are seven genders in the Talmud, and some of them are only described with Greek terms rather than with Hebrew, so it is not difficult to determine that Moses never even heard of five of them. Such a nation cannot endure. There cannot be a great society which fosters and defends immorality. An immoral nation will no longer be great but rather it shall destroy itself in its sin. Egypt, Rome and Sparta, as well as Weimar Germany, all stand as signal historical examples of this very phenomenon.
Immorality is satanic and it has destroyed every nation which has ever experimented with attempts to give it any legitimacy. When those antichrist enemies of our God want to destroy a nation, they begin by promoting immorality, and that is precisely what they have done in America. From Biblical times, they have been the historic purveyors of usury, gambling, prostitution, sodomy, miscegenation, pornography, other sorts of vain entertainments and every other sin on account of which we as a people have fallen.
Perhaps until only recently, the values of most Southerners had not changed. In an article titled The Great Divide Dr. Hill had contrasted American and Southern and expressed many of our sentiments here from a different perspective. One important point he had made is that so-called “American values” are not definable, so America really has no values of its own. We would wholeheartedly agree. Original American values are reflected in the constitutions and laws of the various States, which sometimes differed from one another in varying degrees. But a government can only reflect the values of its people, and now there is such a disparity among the values of its people that it can not stand.
One of the several position papers which had first attracted me to the League of the South is titled The League and Theocracy. In that paper, and in agreement with Thomas Paine, it is explained that: “By a theocracy, we do not mean a government run by pastors and priests… Rather, a theocracy is a government ruled by the… God of the Bible… More precisely, it is a government whose code of law is firmly grounded in the law of the Bible.” Then just as importantly, it is stated that “All law is ultimately ‘religious’ in nature. Some ultimate standard of morality and ethics is the basis of all law.” This is absolutely true. But sadly most people seem to be oblivious to this truth. They must ask themselves, if the laws of our nation or community are not the laws of our God, then whose laws are they? The laws of man are always arbitrary, but the laws of God are eternal.
As it is recorded in John chapter 15, Yahshua Christ had instructed His disciples that “If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.” Then shortly thereafter He told them “Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you”, referring back to those same commandments of His Father which are found in the law of God. If we keep God’s law, we too hope to be friends of Christ, and it is only on that basis same that we may be friends with one another. This had an impression on the young apostle John, and many years later he wrote in the 5th chapter of his first epistle that “2 By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments. 3 For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.” While each of us may fail at any given time, if we do not all endeavor to keep the commandments of God, then we cannot be friends with one another, and those of us who do seek to keep His commandments are obliged to part ways with those who won’t.
That leads to the realization of another problem and another reason why we must secede from America if we want to continue in our own Christian values and way of life. The Northeast and the West Coast states are populated with tens of millions of perverts, many which have now leached into the Christian states of the South, Midwest and Rocky Mountain areas. Throughout the latter half of the 20th century, the southern States had neglected or refused to change their laws in order to accommodate the perverts, so the Federal government and its courts ultimately forced those States into compliance. Now the day is approaching, and may even have already come, where Christians will never again outvote the wicked. We cannot live with these perverts, because we cannot tolerate their evil. We must not seek their peace. If we desire to please our God, if we wish to see His blessings upon our race, then we must seek to separate ourselves from these people and do our best to live in a manner which is compliant with His laws. Secession is therefore not only a right, but a moral obligation.
Sadly, such perverts are actually now all over the cities of the South, and due to the effects of the media and entertainment industry which have emanated from the coasts, many of them are now homegrown. On recent trips to South Carolina and Tennessee, as well as Pinellas County here in Florida, we were actually surprised by the number of sodomites, lesbians and other perverts which we had seen. But nothing better exemplifies the widening gulf between the righteous and the wicked in this country more than the recent Supreme Court decision in the Dobbs vs. Jackson case, which overturned Roe vs Wade and more recent cases supporting so-called abortion rights. It is my opinion that as it is written it could also overturn federally mandated sodomite marriage and other immoral laws which have been forced upon unwilling States. Then if that does indeed happen, there may be an exodus of leftists from half of the States in the empire. However even then we as Christians are compelled to divorce ourselves from them by seceding from that other half.
The Leftists have been in a panic since this decision, and they have said some incredible things. Many Leftists have even threatened violence and made statements which should further alienate them from most normal people, but most of those things go unreported in mass media. Over three months, from May to August of this year, pro-abortion activists attacked and vandalized at least eighty Christian churches, and zero synagogues.
All of these Leftists protesting so-called reproduction rights in the godless Liberal states are merely posturing. Nothing is going to change for New Yorkers, for example. But universal abortion “rights” have been an assurance to the Left for 60 years that they will ultimately achieve their dysfunctional communist utopia, and sodomite "marriage" was the proverbial icing on the cake for them. Now this Supreme Court decision is their first significant setback in all of that time, so they are traumatized as if they are facing the end of the world. Why does some post-menopausal whore in California care whether or not she will be able to get an abortion in Alabama? This is why: because sinners want everyone else to approve of their sin, or they themselves are not comfortable when they sin, and their consciences are burdened with guilt. They are really protesting because their sin may not be universally "legal", and it will therefore become manifest that it is sin.
That Supreme Court decision is not going to save America. Today we live in an age of tyranny regardless of whom is in political control, because men have come to believe that they can sustain their own liberty, but in truth we can only have liberty in Christ, and once we depart from Him we have an assurance in His law that we shall indeed suffer under tyranny. Today there are idolaters who appeal to the Constitution or even to the Magna Carta or the ideals of the enlightenment as the source of sustaining their liberty, and for their idolatry they are indeed enslaved in tyranny. A document made by men cannot defend liberty. Only God can assure liberty, and He has already told us how He would do that, in the Gospel of Christ, if we keep His commandments. No man is going to vote his way out of that predicament, because God Himself is not a participant in their democracy. In fact, Yahweh our God scorns and holds democracy in derision.
In recent years, it has become more obvious with every passing day that White Christians are being demonized by society, and that White Christians who realize that there is something unique about our race and our civilization which is worth preserving and who dare to make that profession are publicly flogged and excommunicated from the general society. This situation has now persisted for at least forty years. Most of us probably know of the groups who are behind that agenda, but many of us do not know the true reason as to why we suffer thusly. The entire media and most of so-called Big Tech are clearly on the side of the Leftists. Even Fox News, which is generally but mistakenly viewed as having a conservative editorial bias, had promoted the celebration of Sodomy this past June. Donald Trump hosted a dinner party at his home earlier this month which celebrated sodomy and which was attended by so-called “conservative” sodomite political activists.
Another example of the widening gulf is media treatment of men such as Doug Mastriano, a retired Army colonel and Pennsylvania State Senator who recently won the Republican primary for the office of governor in that state, but who lost the general election by a wide margin. A rag which calls itself The Atlantic recently published an article titled Doug Mastriano’s Lunatic Appeal. Mastriano is overtly labeled as a “far right politician” by Wikipedia, and Google features that statement in search results for his name. Scratching the surface, it is apparent that Mastriano is smeared with the “far right” label only because he seeks to keep male Sodomites out of women's’ sports, because he supported Donald Trump, and because he has recognized and campaigned against the blatant election corruption in the state.
More and more, mainstream denominational Christians like Mastriano are publicly scorned and slandered as being “far right” and even as being “Nazis” by leftists and in the media. The gulf between average Christians, or even merely average citizens and the leftists, is widening daily. While both Christianity and Scripture as a whole have traditionally protected the unborn child, countless Jews have publicly declared that overturning Roe vs. Wade would violate their religious freedoms, something which is absolutely contrary to Scripture. The wicked often disguise themselves as angels of light, but they are only agents of darkness. Never being able to maintain the moral high ground which they so audaciously claim to inhabit, wherever the wicked are dominant the end result is always the imposition of tyranny.
Earlier this year, a relatively new brewery and pub in Lititz Pennsylvania, called Tied House, was unjustly assailed for hosting an event organized by a local pastor and a local publisher, which intended to explore whether Pennsylvania should be an explicitly Christian State. The brewery was threatened with boycotts and some local pubs stopped carrying its beer. Yet Pennsylvania was first founded as an exclusively Christian colony, its laws were based solely on Biblical law, and its first legislative act, in 1682, was intended “to make and establish such laws as shall best preserve true Christian and civil liberty, in opposition to all unchristian, licentious, and unjust practices, whereby God may have his due, Caesar his due, and the people their due, from tyranny and oppression.” The average Pennsylvanian never learns this in school, but the founders of the colony must have also understood that true liberty can only come in Christ.
These last hundred and fifty years have seen the center of the political spectrum make a significant shift to the left. Before the late 19th century, most Christian men would never have accepted women’s suffrage or so-called women’s liberation. The proposed Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution, which is purported to remove all differences between the sexes in law, was so controversial when it was introduced in 1923 that it was never passed by Congress until 1972, and it still has not been properly ratified by the States. In spite of that, many of its provisions have been legislated in other ways by either State or Federal governments. Before the 19th century, feminist societies were a rare exception, and now today nearly all nations on earth are feminist. Feminism is a sin, as it weakens the natural structure of the family and it violates the order of Creation as it was ordained by God and upheld by the apostles of Christ in the New Testament.
The so-called “conservatives” of any party have slowly and incrementally accepted the long-running communist agenda to destroy Christian society. Political conservatism has never conserved anything in America. Today it is plainly evident that politicians of all major political parties fully accept and even openly approve of decadence such as Sodomy or fornication. The door to other sins was opened not only in Roe vs. Wade, but in the general acceptance of things such as no-fault divorce, or the acceptance of Sodomy, which was at one time outlawed by most of the States, or especially in the forced acceptance of mixed-race marriages with the Loving vs. Virginia ruling by the Supreme Court in 1967.
Most people today are oblivious to the fact that mixed-race marriages were illegal in all but seven States at one time or another until 1887, and they remained illegal in 32 States until at least 1948. From that time 16 other States changed their laws over the next two decades. Then with that 1967 Supreme Court decision, 16 remaining States – all of them in the South except Delaware – were forced to permit fornication, which is mixed-race marriages.
Likewise, most people are also oblivious to the fact that until 1961, every U.S. State had anti-Sodomy laws, until Illinois repealed theirs that year. Connecticut followed ten years later, in 1971, and 19 other states over the balance of that decade, but not in the South, outside of West Virginia. Even New York and Pennsylvania had laws against Sodomy until the 1980’s. Other liberal states, such as Minnesota, had anti-Sodomy laws into the 21st century. Finally, in a 2003 federal Supreme Court decision in a case known as Lawrence vs. Texas, all anti-Sodomy laws were invalidated by the Federal government, forcing eleven Christian states of the South and three elsewhere to accept the sin.
During this same period, the denominational Christian churches became more and more accepting of all of these sins, while at the same time government has become more and more oppressive and intrusive in the lives of men. From 1899 to 1901 acts of Congress entered into law (Volume 31) contained 2208 pages. From 1950 to 1951 (Volume 64) they totaled 3187 pages. From 2013 to 2014 they totaled nearly 6000 pages (Volumes 127 and 128). Federal spending is now over 9,000 times greater than it was in 1901. As we slide into sin and depravity, we have greater and greater Federal regulation, and higher and higher taxes. None of this is coincidental: without Christ we are only going to sink further and further into oppression.
The actual meaning of the words of Paul of Tarsus in Romans chapter 13 have long been obscured by men, either ministers, priests, theologians or translators of Scripture, who work under government license or commission and who have thereby been compelled to comply with and write things which are agreeable to their governments. This is true whether those governments were represented by kings, popes or IRS agents. In essence, in that chapter of Romans, Paul of Tarsus explained that government, and especially tyrannical government, is a punishment from God. He wrote those words while he himself was a citizen of the tyrannical Roman government. So tyrannical government is one way by which Yahweh God punishes sinners and those who accept sinners.
Romans 13:1 Every soul must be subject to more powerful authorities. Since there is no authority except from God, then those who are, by God are they appointed. 2 Consequently, one opposing the authority has opposed the ordinance of God, and they who are in opposition will themselves receive judgment. 3 For rulers are not a terror to good work, but to evil. Now do you desire to not be fearful of the authority? Practice good, and you will have approval from it; 4 a servant of God is to you for good. But if you practice evil, be fearful; for not without purpose will he bear the sword, indeed a servant of God is an avenger with wrath to he who has practiced evil.
But contrary to the popular perception, Paul is not telling Christians that they must obey a wicked government. Rather, to Paul, what is good is what is obedient to God, and not to government. Christ Himself agrees with Paul, where some of his followers had complained that Pontius Pilate unjustly killed some of the Galilaeans, and, as it is recorded in Luke chapter 13, He said in response “Suppose ye that these Galilaeans were sinners above all the Galilaeans, because they suffered such things? 3 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.” So unless we repent of our sins, and reject the sin of others, we shall all continue to suffer from tyranny. Voting our way out of this tyranny is not an option.
Tyrannical government is a punishment from God for sin. Paul began that epistle to the Romans by describing to them the sins from which their own nation was suffering, and those sins included idolatry, Sodomy and lesbianism, all of which are now a plague which is forced upon us today. Perhaps forty years after Paul wrote that epistle, the Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus attested in his Germania that unlike the Romans, the Germans did not accept sexual immorality as being “up to date”. So calls to “get with the times” or complaints that moral men are “old-fashioned” are really themselves very much “old-fashioned”.
But many men suffer not because they themselves are grievous sinners. Rather, men suffer when they fail to take a stand against sin. At one time in our history, not too long ago, committing sins such as adultery, fornication or Sodomy would get a man killed, or at least punished severely and put out of his community permanently. Now, after a hundred or so years of being programmed with television and movies, the entertainments of the devil, tolerating such evils has become the norm, and over that same time our government has become increasingly oppressive. Now rather than punish Sodomites, Sodomy has become a so-called “right”, and the government defends them even as they groom our children to be Sodomites along with them. This is not a coincidence.
This was all described three thousand years ago. In the Wisdom of Solomon, a brilliant and inspired book which should certainly have been included in our Bibles, the opening chapters describe wicked individuals who aspire to rule by their own law, by the strength of their own hand. They oppress and even kill the righteous who oppose them, because the ways of the righteous are intractable to them. They turn their backs on their own people and favor and marry women of other races, breeding children which the book itself identifies as bastards and as branches which will not thrive. Throughout the work, the sins of the wicked become progressively worse, fornication – the form of it which is called race-mixing today, adultery, sodomy, murder and theft become their way of life until in the closing chapters their fate is described as that of Sodom and Egypt, which was in ancient times the greatest of nations.
In the Revelation of Jesus Christ, in chapter 11, we see that those who would kill His witnesses, and who would then rejoice over their dead bodies, are also likened to Sodom and Egypt, and it is they who bear the mark of the beast. This is the same position in which we find America today. The leftists rejoice every time harm comes to someone who would stand up for the laws of God and the gospel of Christ. They rejoice every time they triumph over morality. They rejoice every time one of their perversions is forced on the general society, usually through legislation which mandates and enforces the toleration of such perversions.
In the Old Testament, the ancient children of Israel – our ancestors – were granted liberty when they did well and kept themselves from sin. But they were oppressed by the other races or by tyrants when they did sin, or when they tolerated sin. Ultimately they had also destroyed themselves in sin, and for that they were taken off into Assyrian and Babylonian captivity. In the closing verses of Romans chapter 1 Paul of Tarsus provided a list of grievous sins and explained that not only are those who commit such things worthy of death, but also those who approve of the people who commit them. There is no victory over oppression for a sinful people, and simply because men deny God altogether that is not going to absolve them of their sin. They are ultimately going to die in misery like Sodom and Egypt, and there is no avoiding that fate.
Neither is God merely something to keep in one’s own back pocket and use as a tool. Sadly, I have seen good friends who appear to be pious and humble and who admit that they are sinners, and then beg God for forgiveness for sins they are pondering but have not yet even committed. So they are really treating God like a magical talisman. Paul of Tarsus warned them, in Hebrews chapter 6, “4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, 5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, 6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.” That is the path to be resurrected to everlasting contempt, which we see in Daniel chapter 12. You cannot righteously repent and then consciously and purposefully sin and claim to repent again, using God like some sort of revolving door, and escape His notice. All men sin, but that is not a valid excuse to sin willfully.
As a digression, just today I saw a friend and sister publicly approve of another man’s sin, and therefore she is making herself guilty of that sin and liable to the same punishment, as Paul explains in Romans chapter 1 and as the law explains in Leviticus chapter 5. From there, I will read the New American Standard Bible since that translation of the Hebrew is better, except where it added a few words in italics which I will omit: “1 Now if a person sins, after he hears a public adjuration, when he is a witness, whether he has seen or known, if he does not tell, then he will bear his guilt.” In other words, if you see someone sin and you know it, if you do not profess it then you are also guilty of the sin, just as Paul had explained that when one accepts a sinner, he is also liable for the punishment which the sinner should receive. Therefore if we are to be friends of Christ, we cannot tolerate sinners. We must separate ourselves from them.
The only way that White Christians can free themselves from tyranny, either in life or in death, is to resist and oppose evil and seek to follow Christ. But implicit racism is not sufficient to keep a nation holy and free from fornication, and implicit disdain for sins such as adultery, Sodomy or fornication is not sufficient to keep a nation moral. So the tolerance of evil has actually facilitated the spread of even more evil throughout our modern society. Like it or not, the gulf between the righteous and the wicked will continue to widen, and all White men and women, especially Christians, are going to be forced to one side of the widening gulf or the other, or they will nevertheless drown in the middle.
Because evil has generally not been explicitly and publicly opposed these last forty years, at least, the American empire has gradually adopted policies which are explicitly contrary to the preservation of White Christians and they are now coming to fruition. Now the empire actively supports and protects the wicked, as we have seen recently in Coeur d’Alene in Idaho, where the police protected an exhibition purposely meant to present Sodomy to children. More recently, in Broward County Florida the local sheriff protected a drag queen exhibition from even relatively passive protests over the presence of children. With the police protecting the exploitation of children, we have not only a right to secession, but a Christian duty to secede, and to punish the sinners once we can secede.
We do not want to reform America, we do not want to take it back, only to see the same mistakes of Liberalism repeated once again. We know that America cannot be reformed, and that fact is professed throughout League of the South literature. So we wait for it to crumble, and we hope to help it crumble by adjuring the realm and advocating for secession. But we are not going to have victory by voting, and we are not abjuring the realm if we support politicians who are supporting the realm. So as a Christian, I could never aspire to be just another voice in the cesspool of democracy, or seek after petty political alliances with the hope of advancing a cause, while inevitably watering down my Christian principles in order to accommodate those alliances. That is what every Christian group which seeks relief through political means is ultimately forced to do. As Christians, we have a greater assurance in the imminent fall of Mystery Babylon than we do under this tyrannical government. But the only avenue by which we shall enjoy that assurance is to conduct ourselves as true Christians, and not to tolerate evil because in the end, God will not be mocked.
In the meantime we can only pray that more of our own people awaken to this realization. So we must also pray for repentance, because even repentance is a gift from God. Therefore, if my words or my actions grieve my brethren, I cannot be blamed for that grief if I am only seeking to uphold the commandments of Christ. From the words of Paul of Tarsus in 2 Corinthians chapter 7, where Paul spoke of their own tolerance for a certain fornicator within their community: “9 Now I rejoice, not because you have been grieved, rather because you have been grieved into repentance; for you had been grieved by God, in order that in nothing have you been damaged by us. 10 For that grief which is by God accomplishes repentance for a preservation not to be regretted, but the grief of the world accomplishes death.”
I would rather cause no man grief, but causing grief which results in repentance, even in friends, is therefore a reason for me to rejoice, as it also was with Paul. In this I would rejoice even if it killed me, because it is much more important to please God rather than men. If I grieve my friends in my endeavor to uphold the laws of my God, I am not being an enemy to my friends. I would become their enemies, and my own enemy, if I merely acquiesced and let them wallow in their sins. I am sinning with them if I fail to declare their sins. If they do not repent, I should not rejoice, but rather mourn on their behalf.
When friends sin and you yourself endeavor to obey God, if they are not repentant then you are not departing from them, but rather, they have already departed from you.
Then, because we ourselves may sometimes be the vehicles through which our brethren who are among the wicked are awakened, when we pray we must also pray for courage, as Paul also made an example of himself where he was about to face the emperor Nero and therefore he wrote in the closing verses of his epistle to the Ephesians, asking them to pray: “19 … on my behalf in order that speech may be given to me in the opening of my mouth with freespokenness to make known the mystery of the Gospel, 20 for which I am an apostle in chains, that in them I may speak freely as it is necessary for me to speak.” Now the mystery of the gospel is no longer a mystery, as Paul had also taught his readers. When Christians repent of their sins, and cease from tolerating the sins of the wicked, only then shall their God act on their behalf and avenge them.
Furthermore, we cannot please God, and we only invite His judgment upon ourselves, when we bring the wicked in amongst ourselves. So we read in 2 Corinthians chapter 6: “14 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? 15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? 16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean
thing; and I will receive you, 18 And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.”
The translation of the Greek word ἄπιστος as unbelievers is not entirely accurate. It does not mean to refer to someone who is without faith but who is expected to have faith. If that were the case, Paul would be instructing his readers to preach to them, rather than to shun them. Rather, ἄπιστος is not even a noun, but an adjective which primarily means to describe someone who is distrusted or faithless. Christ came only for the children of Israel, and Paul had explained in Romans chapter 4 that the faith of Christianity is the faith of Abraham, who believed that his descendants would inherit the earth, and that therefore the promise of Christ was certain to all of Abraham’s seed, or descendants. So, as Paul also professed in Hebrews chapter 8, citing Jeremiah chapter 31, the new covenant was made only with the house of Judah and the house of Israel, Abraham’s literal descendants. So the subsequent verses in that passage from Paul’s epistle concerning the command not to be yoked to the faithless are all citations from the prophets of the Old Testament, of words which were meant only for those same children of Israel.
Where Paul had said “come out from among them”, he was speaking of people who were not included in the covenants, essentially the same people from whom the children of Israel were commanded to keep themselves separate in ancient times. This command was uttered in the words of God recorded by Moses in Exodus chapter 19, and also in the words of the apostle Peter in 1 Peter chapter 2. The purposeful introduction of anyone else who is not of the promises of the faith of Abraham into any congregation of Christians is to introduce wolves into the sheepfold. This is true no matter the purpose of the congregation for gathering. It may be a family holiday dinner, a hobby meeting, or a religious service. This is a sin for Christians, and it is not excusable no matter the purpose for which it is done. If we are to please God, while in this world we cannot be perfect, we are nevertheless commanded to be a separate and peculiar people.
The only way we may ever succeed at anything is by the grace of Yahweh our God, and the only way to even hope to have His grace is to keep His law. Keeping His law means that we must do our best to follow it in every aspect of life, not just in some aspects of our own choosing. Because we live in a fallen world, there are things we must tolerate which are beyond our control. But for the things which are within our control, we have no excuse when we transgress the commandments of Christ. Neither family nor politics nor anything else are valid reasons to shelve the commandments of our God and in fact, shelving the commandments of our God is the primary reason why we suffer in this world, and why we are oppressed by tyrants.
We have all heard the popular slogan of the Confederacy, Deo Vindice, which is God Vindicates, and He does. But He frequently uses His people, those of them who are obedient to His Word, as the tool by which He executes that vindication. Thus Paul had also written in relation to the repentance of the Corinthians that by “bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ” only then could they find themselves “in a readiness to revenge all disobedience, when your obedience is fulfilled.” So therefore, if we do not endeavor to love Christ and hope to be His friend, by keeping His commandments, all of our efforts are absolutely futile.
Praise Yahweh, the God of Israel, and may He bless our just endeavors.
Before I finish this evening, I just want to say a few things about titles, things which I have always said, and which I have said in podcast presentations long ago, although now I have not said them in a long time. I guess I could use the title pastor if I so desired. Once upon a time, other men who themselves were noted Christian nationalists had conferred that title upon me. Of course, I may not necessarily be your pastor, and that is fine. I am not trying to be your pastor. Since my commentaries on the Bible and history typically get thousands of downloads, or listeners, I suppose, then perhaps I might be somebody’s pastor, even somebody that I do not even know. Paul of Tarsus once said something very similar to the Corinthians, in chapter 9 of his first epistle to them, and therefore, of course, the argument is valid.
But the truth is that I really do not like, and therefore I would not use, titles to describe or introduce myself. So I would never like being called by some title. That is because a title preceding a name is a pretense of authority, and often men with titles are conferred with authority in areas where they do not necessarily merit any authority. For my part, I would rather have my words and my actions stand on their own merit, and if they are worthy, they should be my only authority. They should be the only reason why you might want to listen to me, not because of some title. If they are not worthy, then I would be the first to pray that they are soon forgotten.
So while I dislike the title pastor, nevertheless I will always be a pastor, in the sense that I will always strive to set an example and put my God and His law first, as the only true authority and in spite of any friendships and associations. Then, if someone who knows me is truly my friend, he would not ever put me in a position where I must compromise or choose between him of my God, and neither would I want to do that to him. If we both strive to please God, and be His friend, then we should have no problem being friends with one another. So it is difficult to have friends who would not seek to be friends of My God along with me.
We cannot be part-time Christians. We cannot be Christians only at home or only at church on Sunday, and then not be Christians all throughout the week, because sometimes it is not convenient to be Christians. We cannot put our God on a shelf and go participate in worldly political campaigns for men whose actions and values are opposed to the Word of our God. We must strive to be Christians all of the time that we live in this world.
That is a difficult walk, but it is an ideal which we should all strive to attain, even if many of us may fail at one time or another. So when we fail, we must acknowledge our sins, pick one another up, and strive to do better. If we cannot acknowledge our sins, and cease from them, then we will never do better and we may as well succumb to tyranny because that is the inevitable result of our sin.