Christogenea Europe

Every Friday night at 8:PM Eastern. Hear Christian Identity explained from Scripture like you have never heard it before! Listen on Talkshoe or here on Christogenea streaming radio.

CHRISTOGENEA Fridays on Talkshoe at 8:00 PM Eastern

TalkShoe

 

 

Alfred the Great - Anglo-Saxon Fuhrer

 
00:00

Introductory notes:

Before Alfred the Great, there were few Anglo-Saxon Kings who had any degree of care for learning and refined culture. One of them who did was Alfred of Northumbria, who preceded Alfred the Great by nearly 150 Years. But Alfred of Northumbria only had an opportunity for learning when he himself was passed over for the throne by the Witena, or council, and his younger brother had received his father's kingdom. Rather than fight the decision, Alfred retired to Ireland and received an education in the Scriptures and other literature. He became king of Northumbria after 15 years of such an education, when his younger brother died. Soon following Alfred to the throne was Coelwulf, the patron of the English church historian Bede. In Book 3, Chapter 9 of his History of the Anglo-Saxons, Sharon Turner says:

“The effect of Alfred’s reign and habits in this province became visible in Ceolwulf, who soon succeeded to his throne. This prince, who acceded in 731, was the patron to whom Bede addressed his ecclesiastical history of the English nation. In the dedication, the venerable father of the Anglo-Saxon learning says, that it was this king’s delight not only to hear the Scriptures read, but to be well acquainted with the deeds and sayings of his illustrious predecessors. From this feeling he had desired Bede to compose his history. But the flame, which Alfred had kindled in his dominions, was soon afterwards quenched there by the sanguinary civil contests that succeeded. It burnt, however, with a cheering influence in the other provinces of the octarchy. Bede and Alcuin may be considered as two of the valuable minds which it had excited.”

Invading Britain: Then and Now, It Always Comes Down to Treachery! Part 3

 
00:00

William Finck's program notes follow (other resources are linked below):

A HISTORY OF THE MONEY CHANGERS, by Andrew Hitchcock

1558 Queen Elizabeth I succeeds Queen Mary I, her half sister, to the throne in England. During her reign, Queen Elizabeth I decided that in order to wrest control of the money supply she would have to issue her own gold and silver coins. She did this through the public treasury and successfully took control of the money supply from the money changers.

1609 The money changers in the Netherlands establish the first central bank in history, in Amsterdam.

1642 Oliver Cromwell is financed by the money changers for the purposes of fomenting a revolution in England, and allowing them to take control of the money system again. After much bloodshed, Cromwell finally purges the parliament, overthrows King Charles I and puts him to death in 1649.

The money changers immediately consolidate their power and for the next few decades plunge Great Britain into a costly series of wars. They also take over a square mile of property in the center of London which becomes known as the City of London.

1688 The money changers in England following a series of squabbles with the Stuart Kings, Charles II (1660 - 1685) and James II (1685 - 1688), conspire with their far more successful money changing counterparts in the Netherlands, who had already set up a central bank there.

They decide to finance an invasion by William of Orange of Netherlands who they sound out and establish will be more favorable to them. The invasion is successful and William of Orange ascends to the throne in England as King William III in 1689.

Invading Britain: Then and Now, It Always Comes Down to Treachery! Part 2

 
00:00

William Finck's program notes follow:

When the Jews were banished by Edward I, usury was banished along with them. I found the following excellent summary in a book of the Parliamentary debates of New Zealand for the year 1901, where there was a debate over the permittance of pawn shops:

The Anglo-Saxon laws against usury were also very severe. Edward the Confessor outlawed usurers and confiscated their property; and [300 years later] Edward the First took such stringent steps to put an end to what was considered a great evil that he hanged 280 Jews and banished another fifteen thousand in one year - in fact, the opposition of the Catholic and also the Reformed Church with regard to this matter was so strong that it was considered un-Christian to take interest for money lent; and the consequence was that a liberal interpretation was put upon the Mosaic law to which I have referred, and the business fell principally into the hands of the Jews. It was held that, while a Jew might not take interest from another Jew, he was at liberty to get all he could from a stranger. Well, the fifteen thousand Jews were banished in one year, and no Jews were allowed to return to England until the time of Cromwell. That shows the view taken in England at that time in regard to the practice. It was left to Henry the Eighth to be the first to legalise usury in England, and he fixed the rate at 10 per cent. But his son, Edward the Sixth, a few years afterwards, repealed it: he did not believe in it; but when Elizabeth, the virgin Queen, came to the throne, she revived the statute of her father. James the First reduced the rate of interest to 8 per cent., Cromwell to 6, and Anne to 5; and since then usury has continued to exist and flourish.

Henry the VIII was raising money for wars in Europe, and he was at first relying on benevolences and the taking of loans without intentions on paying them back to do so. Benevolences were the extorting of “free will offerings” by the king from his subjects.

Invading Britain: Then and Now, It Always Comes Down to Treachery! Part 1

 
00:00

 

No matter the invasion, the conquered or the conqueror, it has always been the treachery of the native kings, nobles or chieftains by which Britain was overrun by foreigners, whether they were Romans or Saxons or Normans. The same thing is true of the non-White hordes who are overrunning Britain today.

Christogenea Europe, July 19th, 2015: Early Two-Seedline

CHR-Euro-2015-07-19-EarlyTwoSeedline.mp3 — Downloaded 4153 times
 
00:00

The introduction for this program employed information found at Clifton Emahiser's website here: Early Celtic Church Taught Physical Seduction Of Eve!! and here: Early Church Era On Two Seedline

The following are William Finck's notes for the program:

A brief discussion of the universalist poison of Clement, Origen and Eusebius

Clement of Alexandria misused the phrase “brood of vipers” in Book 1 Chapter 11 of The Instructor (Paedagogus) and in Book 4 chapter 16 of The Stromata. Then in his Exhortation to the Heathen, Chapter 1, ascertained that one could go from being of the “brood of vipers” to being a man of God by accepting Christ:

Again, therefore, some venomous and false hypocrites, who plotted against righteousness, He once called “a brood of vipers.” But if one of those serpents even is willing to repent, and follows the Word, he becomes a man of God.

The universalist position of Scripture was expressed by Clement of Alexandria, and after him it was continued by his student Origen, another Alexandrian, and then by Eusebius. By the time of Eusebius, it seems to be the only position he could imagine, although he neglected to mention at least some of his own theological opponents, such as Methodius of Olympus.

Christogenea Europe, July 5th, 2015: Judaea, Judah and Jew

CHR-Euro-2015-07-05-Judaea-Judah-Jew.mp3 — Downloaded 3946 times
 
00:00

Understanding that Judaea in the Roman period was a multi-cultural province of Canaanites and Edomites as well as Israelites of the tribe of Judah is the first step in understanding why Jesus was certainly not a "Jew". Today's Jews descend from Edomites and Canaanites. While a few may have partially descended from Judah, they are bastards and do not count as Israel.

Christogenea Europe, May 24th, 2015: What is White in a World of Bastards?

CHR-Euro-2015-05-24-What_is_White.mp3 — Downloaded 4394 times
 
00:00

What is White in a World of Bastards

Identity Christians should accept anyone who is apparently White, identifies as White, and who accepts the Gospel of Christ as being White. But it takes a greater-than-average knowledge of history and Scripture to accept Christian Identity, so we cannot expect all Whites who first hear it to do so, and some will never do so. Therefore. Identity Christians should accept as White anyone who, not having an Identity Christian understanding of Scripture, is apparently White and identifies as White so long as they do not openly oppose our message.

Because these lines can be so complicated in today's world with all of its various competing philosophies, then for the purpose of the problems which we are trying to address here we should define our expectations from our fellow Whites, whether they profess to be Christian or not, in the simplest terms possible.

Those terms are best represented by what we may call Positive Christianity and White exclusivity.

Christogenea Europe, May 10th, 2015: White Nationalist Cognitive Dissonance Part 2

CHR-Euro-2015-10-26-WN_Disconnect_2.mp3 — Downloaded 5996 times
 
00:00

Christogenea Europe, April 26th, 2015: White Nationalist Cognitive Dissonance

CHR-Euro-2015-04-26-WN_Disconnect.mp3 — Downloaded 6734 times
 
00:00

These notes have been developed into an article for the next Saxon Messenger, with the same title: White Nationalist Cognitive Dissonance

The following are William Finck's opening remarks:

We are going to play a tape, actually a YouTube video, of a man who is interviewing several PhDs and science students, and asking them for one observed instance of macro-evolution. While micro-evolution is often used for what may better be called the adaptation of species, macro-evolution is the actual changing of one identifiable kind, such as a cat, into another identifiable kind, such as a dog or a cow. Evolutionists play with the word species, and when it comes to macro-evolution they are challenged by the concept of kind. When they are cornered, as one PhD in the video was cornered, they  insist that by adding an unspecified but very long amount of time, macro-evolution somehow happens. But they cannot prove that it has ever actually happened, and it has never been observed to happen. Therefore macro-evolution is a religious belief, and it is at least as fantastic a belief as those of any other religion. One PhD interviewed was forced to admit that evolution in this regard is a “belief”, even though he was very reluctant to do so. Other PhDs were speechless and fumbling when challenged on macro-evolution. Textbooks and journals, which hypothetically extrapolate entire genera from the bones of certain long-dead animals, are merely promoting conjecture which does not at all amount to valid science.

The video below was played during the opening segment of the program:

Christogenea Europe, March 1st, 2015: The European Right: What are the Chances?

CHR-Euro-2015-03-01.mp3 — Downloaded 3831 times
 
00:00

The European Right: What are the Chances?

Sven Longshanks and William Finck begin a walk through some of Britain and Europe's "right wing" and "nationalist" parties to sort out which are real and which are onbly pretending. We are not really looking for a political solution, because like all Identity Chrtistians, we know well enough that There is No Political Solution. Rather, we are only looking for the actual level of racial consciousness and awareness of the devil among the political players in Europe.

Of course, the chances are none, because...

...well, here are some of the opening notes:

I found a website this morning called “World Without Nazism”, from an outfit calling itself the “International Human Rights Movement”. Preliminary observations tell me that this outfit is based in Moscow, and is heavily staffed with Jews, mostly of the radical academic variety. It's website is http://stopnazism.net/. On the website, they publish a free PDF book called “The White Papers of Hate”, which consists of over a thousand pages describing bias in the laws of European countries, incidents of what they call the “Glorification of Nazism”, incidents of anti-Semitism or any criticism of Israel or any other pro-Zionist policy, and a host of other things. All of this, of course, feeds the Jewish political paradigm that only White Europeans are capable of hatred, can systematize hatred, and must be constantly observed lest new epidemics of hatred break out at any time.

This reflects the same anti-White attitude that the jewish-controlled Western media also continually propagates. “The White Papers of Hate” goes so far as to identify the British Laws of Settlement from 1701 and the laws favoring men in line for the British throne in their search for White hate. In the Jewish fervor to create all of Europe, and then the world, into a Jewish-run Marxist utopia, no stone is left unturned. In this atmosphere, where the anti-fa is glorified and allowed to operate above the law while all Whites are demonized, we look for glimmers of hope in European politics.

Good Fudging luck!

As an aside, the BBC yesterday reported that a Pegida UK demonstration in Newcastle for which they say about 400 people turned out, was met with an opposition of about 2000 counter-protesters. According to the BBC, Pegida UK spokeswoman Marion Rogers said: "We are not racist, we are not fascist, we are not far-right and we're certainly not anti-Islam - we've got Muslims here with us today.” So that only makes us wonder why they were even protesting, if she is really speaking for the group. Yesterday afternoon The Guardian trumpeted the news that “Far-right Pegida eclipsed by its opponents at first UK demo”.

In the end, only Yahshua Christ can save us!

Pages