Commentary on Society

This program is going to be titled The Kingdom of Heaven, or the Elections of Men? We are going to begin by presenting a short sermon by Bertrand Comparet, and making some remarks in reference to it. But then we shall discuss the currently ongoing election season in the United States, and how Christians should look at both it and at the possibilities. We shall have brother Ryan and, perhaps a little later, some of our other friends and brethren with us for that discussion.

The Kingdom Of Heaven or In Heaven? by Bertrand L. Comparet

Prepared for internet publication by Clifton A. Emahiser’s Teaching Ministries, with Critical Notes

Disputing the nature of the Kingdom of Heaven in this sermon, Comparet is really disputing with Judaized Christians who have some sort of fantasy vision of the kingdom of heaven as castles in the clouds.

There is some dispute, in ecclesiastical circles, whether the kingdom of Yahweh, so often mentioned by Yahshua, is to be on earth or only in heaven. This is based chiefly on the use, only by Matthew, of the phrase the kingdom of heaven. Because of this verse, some have argued that the kingdom must only be in heaven, being heaven itself as ruled by Almighty Yahweh. Neither Mark, Luke nor John refer to the kingdom of heaven, but only to the kingdom of God. Even Matthew uses as an equivalent phrase, the kingdom of God, four times at Matthew 6:33; 12:28; 21:31 & 21:43. In Matthew 13:43 & 26:29 Yahshua speaks of the kingdom of their Father [in reference to the righteous] and My Father’s kingdom. Both of these phrases obviously being equivalent to the kingdom of God. There is clearly no distinction between the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God. [So Comparet asks:] Then why were the two phrases used?

Christogenea Saturdays, January 9th, 2016: Addressing Feminism, Part 2

Tonight we are only going to discuss some basic Biblical principles in comparison with the state of our modern society. We are doing this primarily because we do not know how far we have fallen unless we understand just where we really should be. We cannot even properly recognize feminism until we learn what our God expects from women, from men, and from women in relation to men.

In what I can only call the formerly Christian nations, women today typically walk around half naked. Some of them wear clothing which is so revealing that they may be better off naked. Doing so, they attract much attention to their physical form. But these women actually think that they are properly dressed simply because some fabric is stretched across certain areas of their bodies (I can hear it now, when they say “Well, my nipples are covered...”). Then these women roam about freely, going wheresoever they desire, and they have an expectation that they will never suffer harm.

I am not stating that all women who get raped deserve it. In fact, no woman deserves to be raped. But we as a society are now the victims of our own feminism. In an all-White and Christian society, there are hardly any men who would rape a woman even if she were half naked and out roaming the streets alone. But the standards which we now live with, under which the modern habits of dress and behavior for women have developed, came about not because of Christianity, but in spite of Christianity. They are the result of centuries of so-called progress and freedom in all-White and at least marginally Christian societies which are governed by the rule of law, and where people have it in their hearts to care about the law.

Christogenea Internet Radio, January 1st, 2016: Addressing Feminism, Part 1

It is probably long past time that we discussed the topic of feminism. Not that we have avoided it, because we think that we have already addressed many aspects of the problem in the weekly Bible commentaries that we have been conducting the past seven years. But perhaps we need specific programs laying out the evils of feminism in society. Notice that I said programs, in the plural. This is a huge topic with multiple layers of abstraction, and feminism has several forms which keep society locked into a dialectic, supporting one form or another, which is right where our enemies want us to be. On the one side we have the worship of the female form and the elevation of women to the status of goddess, which is an ancient pagan ideal that leads to all sorts of perversion. On the other side we have the Jewish Golem of the ugly woman who thinks she should be a man, which was also found in the ancient world, manifested in the Greek tales of the Amazons and other myths, and which is just as pagan. In the meantime, we have the rather consistent portrayal in the Jewish media of the traditional wife and mother as a battered and abused and oppressed creature, whereby the enemies of our God and our race do their best to reduce the important role of the woman in the traditional family to the status of merely an unattractive lifestyle choice.

William Finck has posted his program notes with pertinent links at the Christogenea Forum under the same title, found here: Rejecting Rainbow Nationalism.

Mike Delaney of Prothink.org and Trutube.tv and Brett Light of ExpeltheParasite.com and AryanIsrael join William Finck for a discussion on Rainbow Nationalism, and why White Nationalists, and especially Christians Nationsalists, must reject these failures and victims of the Jewish agenda and Jewish Pop Culture.

Libertarianism cannot be Christian, updated October 31st, 2015

Before I begin, I want to define Libertarianism. So for that I will simply employ the default definition which appears on the Google search page for the term:

Libertarianism (Latin: liber, "free") is a political philosophy that upholds liberty as its principal objective. Libertarians seek to maximize autonomy and freedom of choice, emphasizing political freedom, voluntary association, and the primacy of individual judgment.

I was inspired to make this presentation tonight in part because here in the United States the long and arduous political season is upon us once again, in part we are constantly confronted with so-called Christian Libertarians in social media, and in part because a few weeks ago I saw a three-part series of articles on the internet from a website which calls itself The Libertarian Republic, which are titled Why Christians Make Great Libertarians. The articles were quite repulsive, as they reflect an absolute lack of true Christian understanding. So we are going to proceed by presenting part of the first in that series of articles, small portions of the others, and offering some criticism. The first article opens by saying that:

In 1932, the Christian apologist G.K. Chesterton expressed concern that many people were according the government with a trust and reverence that ought to be reserved only for God. Chesterton’s admonition was not only prophetic, but rooted in the deepest mainspring of Christianity’s past; he was echoing words spoken by the prophet Samuel nearly three thousand years ago.

Here William Finck presents his article The Camp of The Saints Revisited. There is no doubt that Jews are behind the flood of "immigration" into Europe, and that Europeans have no current political solution because the European nations are not actually democracies.
 

In the second half of the program, David Duke is taken to task for accepting and perpetuating the lies of the Jews concerning the Bible. (The text is posted in the Christogenea Forum.)

Understanding that Judaea in the Roman period was a multi-cultural province of Canaanites and Edomites as well as Israelites of the tribe of Judah is the first step in understanding why Jesus was certainly not a "Jew". Today's Jews descend from Edomites and Canaanites. While a few may have partially descended from Judah, they are bastards and do not count as Israel.

Mike Delaney of Prothink.org and Trutube.tv discusses the Real White Nationalism found in Christian Identity as supposed to the hollow ideals and corrupted Jewish morality of so-called secular White nationalists.

The notes for both parts 1 and 2 of this presentation have been developed into an article for the Saxon Messenger, with the same title: White Nationalist Cognitive Dissonance

The notes for both parts 1 and 2 of this presentation have been developed into an article for the Saxon Messenger, with the same title: White Nationalist Cognitive Dissonance

The notes for both parts 1 and 2 of this presentation have been developed into an article for the Saxon Messenger, with the same title: White Nationalist Cognitive Dissonance

The following are William Finck's opening remarks:

We are going to play a tape, actually a YouTube video, of a man who is interviewing several PhDs and science students, and asking them for one observed instance of macro-evolution. While micro-evolution is often used for what may better be called the adaptation of species, macro-evolution is the actual changing of one identifiable kind, such as a cat, into another identifiable kind, such as a dog or a cow. Evolutionists play with the word species, and when it comes to macro-evolution they are challenged by the concept of kind. When they are cornered, as one PhD in the video was cornered, they  insist that by adding an unspecified but very long amount of time, macro-evolution somehow happens. But they cannot prove that it has ever actually happened, and it has never been observed to happen. Therefore macro-evolution is a religious belief, and it is at least as fantastic a belief as those of any other religion. One PhD interviewed was forced to admit that evolution in this regard is a “belief”, even though he was very reluctant to do so. Other PhDs were speechless and fumbling when challenged on macro-evolution. Textbooks and journals, which hypothetically extrapolate entire genera from the bones of certain long-dead animals, are merely promoting conjecture which does not at all amount to valid science.

The European Right: What are the Chances?

Sven Longshanks and William Finck begin a walk through some of Britain and Europe's "right wing" and "nationalist" parties to sort out which are real and which are onbly pretending. We are not really looking for a political solution, because like all Identity Chrtistians, we know well enough that There is No Political Solution. Rather, we are only looking for the actual level of racial consciousness and awareness of the devil among the political players in Europe.

William Finck's opening remarks:

The Nibelungs were a race of dwarfs from whom the 5th century Burgundian kings obtained a great horde of gold. Legend has it that the gold ultimately ended up at the bottom of the Rhine. Rumpelstiltskin was an imp who would spin straw into gold in return for a Christian baby. Modern commentators cannot understand why the little old dwarf would want a baby, but anyone who knows the jews would indeed understand. It is shameful, that wherever we see such things in Germanic pagan literature, the pagans are portrayed as being lustful of the gold of these dwarfs, whom history better knows as jews. There is little to no moral ground upon which pagans can stand in order to reject the treachery of the jews in White society....

Cited for this program was My Irrelevant Defence being Meditations Inside Gaol and Out on JEWISH RITUAL MURDER by Arnold S. Leese. Also mentioned was Chaucer's The Prioress' Tale. The jewish book admitting blood libel cited by Sven is found here: http://bloodpassover.com/ (We cannot endorse a book written by a jew, but need to show its existence.)

This PDF purports to be exactly as the text of the original Arnold Leese book, and to be faithful to the pagination.

See Sven Longshanks' article The Jewish Ritual Murder of White Christian Children

The discussion for today's program was centered around a reading of Judges chapters 19 and 20. In the account found there, the entire body of the children of Israel turned out with one mind: to avenge a single woman who had been raped and murdered by certain immoral men in the town of Gibeah in Benjamin. The war which resulted achieved that vengeance, but only at a great cost of life when the "local authorities", the Benjamites themselves, resisted justice.

This episode must be contrasted to the situation in Europe, which is also starting to manifest itself in America and other White nations, where thousands of White women are raped and even murdered each year. Yet the animals who perpetrate such deeds are only given license by the media and governments to continue with such behavior. When will the body of the people arise and stand once again for justice and morality? Or are they all like those ancient "men of Belial", and too immoral themselves?

Christogenea Europe, Sunday September 14th 2014

The second link above is to a recording made by Sven and the quality may be better. We apologize for any technical problems and are attempting to resolve them.

To start off with our topic for this program, we read the Executive Summary section of the official Rotherham report entitled Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham, available at the borough coucil's website.

We discussed the initial reaction to this case from the Jihad Watch website, and also from Breitbart.com. We also discussed the grandfather of one victim who appropriately expresssed a desire to shoot the police chief of Rotherham (see the article at the Telegraph) and the two fathers who found where their daughters were being abused, and arrested the fathers rather than the abusers (see the article at The Star).

We made references and cited the Arnold Leese book on Jewish Ritual Murder, which describes events from Medieval Europe which are very similar to the frequent Muslim rape of non-Muslims in Britain and Europe today.

Some other relevant Rotherham links we did not employ (there are probably thousands of others on the Internet):

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-28939089

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/rotherham-abuse-scandal-former-rotherham-police-officer-charged-with-child-sex-offence-9698159.html

http://news.sky.com/story/1325675/who-should-be-called-to-account-in-rotherham

This recording was replaced with a much clearer recording at 10:15 AM EST on September 1st. We apologize for any inconvenience caused by the poor quality of the original recording.

Christogenea Europe, Sunday August 31st 2014, William Finck's Opening Remarks

Welcome to the first episode of Christogenea Europe with myself and Sven Longshanks. I apologize for not advertising this program aggressively enough in advance, however I am certain that anyone interested will catch up with us. I am hoping that this program, which for the present time is planned for twice a month but may expand that schedule, becomes a place where Europeans especially can come and inquire about Christian Identity, but of course White men and women from other places on the globe are just as welcome.

For this first program, we hope to talk about paganism and Christianity in Europe today. Therefore I am going to start with some comments from the most prominent nationalist in recent history, Adolf Hitler. Doing that, I may succeed in alienating both pagans and perhaps certain Christians.

What follows are the rough notes which were prepared and employed for this presentation. They are of course incomplete, and not all of the notes were used. I thought I should post them here nevertheless. There may be a Saxon Messenger editorial which follows. These notes were made prior to the development of certain events discussed in the program.

BRIEF Discussion of Ukranian National politics, Ukranian Presidents:

1st — Leonid Kravchuk (1991–1994): A Communist Party politician all his life, he declared Ukraine independent from the crumbling Soviet Union in 1991. The Soviet bureaucratic infrastructure was retained. Kravchuk was not a freedom-lover or an innovator, but was rather a compromise between Soviet traditionalists (conservatives) and reformers.

After leaving office, Kravchuk joined a business and political group known as Kiev Holding or the Dynamo Group. This group, led by oligarchs Viktor Medvedchuk (pro-Soviet Ukranian lawyer) and Hryhoriy Surkis (Ukranian Jew businessman and politician), is formally organized as the Social Democratic Party of Ukraine (marginalized since Orange Revolution). Despite its formal centrist/social-democratic slogans, the party is widely associated with big business, organized crime, corruption, and media bias.

A presentation of William Finck's December, 2013 Saxon Messenger editorial, Slavery for a Hundred Years - and Longer.

Mike Delaney of Prothink.org and Sword Brethren offer an impromptu off-the-cuff discussion regarding the agenda of sexual deviants in America. We thank these brethren for filling in for us as William Finck was travelling this week. We also thank our good friend Jerel Mosley for his participation.